Safety Metrics & AC91-57C
#226

Thread Starter

Is AMA that fragile that it needs Jason Cole banning anyone that dares to cross EXF4BGUY or other AMA royalty on RCG?
Last edited by franklin_m; 11-23-2022 at 08:32 AM.
#228
Senior Member

As a member of the AMA EC, are you proud of the banning on RCG? Are you proud of the AMA members piling on to get other AMA members banned? Are you proud that RCG, a site associated with AMA due to its owner being an AMA CD, banning other AMA members for what are really manufactured reasons?
Is AMA that fragile that it needs Jason Cole banning anyone that dares to cross EXF4BGUY or other AMA royalty on RCG?
Is AMA that fragile that it needs Jason Cole banning anyone that dares to cross EXF4BGUY or other AMA royalty on RCG?
#229
Senior Member

As a member of the AMA EC, are you proud of the banning on RCG? Are you proud of the AMA members piling on to get other AMA members banned? Are you proud that RCG, a site associated with AMA due to its owner being an AMA CD, banning other AMA members for what are really manufactured reasons?
Is AMA that fragile that it needs Jason Cole banning anyone that dares to cross EXF4BGUY or other AMA royalty on RCG?
Is AMA that fragile that it needs Jason Cole banning anyone that dares to cross EXF4BGUY or other AMA royalty on RCG?
#230
Senior Member

Older threads default to the current name so it's hard to decipher exactly when "and Drone" was added to the RCG Model Aircraft Advocacy forum. But searching turns up some gems. This from March 2012, AMA IN ACTION, shows Rich Hanson giving the FU to the FAA right after Section 336 was passed, "Your questions answered - The 400 foot limit for model aircraft", sub-title "worrisome comment about a 400 foot limit" from John W. McGraw, Deputy Director, FAA Flight Standards Office: https://amablog.modelaircraft.org/am...odel-aircraft/
The McGraw interview, TL;DR, the FAA did not consider drones to be model aircraft. The idiot Rich Hanson is who decided otherwise and threw away the sweet deal of Section 336 over FPV.
RCGroups, August 2013: https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...rposes/page192
Starts at page 192. Pretty long but a good read for anyone interested in the AMA debacle, comments from B. Shulman, and a lot of suspended accounts!
RCGoups, June 2014, "FAA says all (goggles) FPV is illegal": https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...FPV-is-illegal
The dope running AMA in 2014 with his armchair lawyering defending FPV before his reality check and the FAA reminding him who is actually in charge.
Found in this RCGroups thread, December, 2010:https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...-Concerned-%29
Titled " FAA vs Model Aviation (Should We Be Concerned?)". Should be the other way around. AMA lost.
The McGraw interview, TL;DR, the FAA did not consider drones to be model aircraft. The idiot Rich Hanson is who decided otherwise and threw away the sweet deal of Section 336 over FPV.
RCGroups, August 2013: https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...rposes/page192
Starts at page 192. Pretty long but a good read for anyone interested in the AMA debacle, comments from B. Shulman, and a lot of suspended accounts!
RCGoups, June 2014, "FAA says all (goggles) FPV is illegal": https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...FPV-is-illegal
The dope running AMA in 2014 with his armchair lawyering defending FPV before his reality check and the FAA reminding him who is actually in charge.
Found in this RCGroups thread, December, 2010:https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...-Concerned-%29
Titled " FAA vs Model Aviation (Should We Be Concerned?)". Should be the other way around. AMA lost.
Last edited by ECHO24; 11-23-2022 at 08:45 PM.
#231
Senior Member

Thread number 2 has some great advice for online discussions (xfc3dcd):
"The problem with people like David and Bimbo is they lack that filter most people have that asks questions like -
Am I being redundant? .................................................. .........Obviously
Does anyone besides me care about my thoughts? ..................... NA
Do my comments add value to the conversation? ........................NA
Is my input helping another and pushing intellectual progress? .....Push your own intellectual baby stroller.
"The problem with people like David and Bimbo is they lack that filter most people have that asks questions like -
Am I being redundant? .................................................. .........Obviously
Does anyone besides me care about my thoughts? ..................... NA
Do my comments add value to the conversation? ........................NA
Is my input helping another and pushing intellectual progress? .....Push your own intellectual baby stroller.
#234
Senior Member

Who doesn't love a cuddly trog posting a syrupy-sweet valentine right after a personal insult. Someone beat you to it:
https://www.teetweets.com/products/d...ers-and-losers
Cheers indeed.
.
https://www.teetweets.com/products/d...ers-and-losers
Cheers indeed.
.
#235

My Feedback: (3)

HAPPY THANKSGIVING to all the odd old men that frequent this forum! Yes, even the folks that I disagree with, as well as the trolls! Thanks know no bounds and the fact that we are all able to participate in this hobby is a sign that we all have more than we need.
CHEERS!
Astro
CHEERS!
Astro
Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
#236
Senior Member

Just another virtue signaling fraud piping out BS on the internet.
Last edited by ECHO24; 11-24-2022 at 05:47 PM.
#237

My Feedback: (1)

Not well said at all - re. his post immediately before 'Dancing with Myself' then the syrupy drivel, in case you missed the reference. These off-handed insults are a holiday tradition for this guy. The little man so quick to tag others with psychological disorders needs a long look in the mirror.
Astro
#238
Senior Member

And what part of the mind of this little fellow dishing out the psychological diagnosis's dreamed up that me. speed and coupez were conspiring to ban him though our "favor" with the moderators? I'm banned on RCGroups for one.
#241
Senior Member

It's not who's to judge, my little psychological fraud friend. It's that you post only gossip and personal attacks, no actual content. You've boxed yourself in such that you have to side with a serial liar who's dumb as a rock (Rich Hanson) just to get attention, on something you would otherwise agree on. You are a broken person.
#244

My Feedback: (1)

Your claims are bogus and just provide the proof of the wretched humans you are. How many times have you and speedy whined about "bullying"? You guys are deplorable...
crawl back in the dank hole from which you emerged...
Astro
#245

My Feedback: (3)

speed doesn't have me on ignore, he has me on "copy and paste", so he can post in on RCG and then whine to moderation when I reply to defend the lies and BS he posts.
Your claims are bogus and just provide the proof of the wretched humans you are. How many times have you and speedy whined about "bullying"? You guys are deplorable...
crawl back in the dank hole from which you emerged...
Astro
Your claims are bogus and just provide the proof of the wretched humans you are. How many times have you and speedy whined about "bullying"? You guys are deplorable...
crawl back in the dank hole from which you emerged...
Astro
Look who is talking. You’ve been trying to drive me out of RCU for years! Not any different then having someone banned IMO. DO NOT assume you know anything about my life, I’m not the one acting like a miserable ******* and blaming everyone for my unhappiness such as you do. All anyone needs to do to see what a sad pathetic loser you are is to compare my post log to yours and see that every post you make is full of negativity. I’m done with you, I will never acknowledge you again, you have zero worth.
Now if everyone could do the same I wonder how long it would take for you guys to start feeding on your own? LOL
Look out ECHO24 could it be your turn in the barrel??????????
Last edited by Propworn; 11-25-2022 at 08:39 AM.
#246

My Feedback: (1)

You are correct on having you on ignore through the site he has chosen to have nothing to do with your childish baiting. My mistake this is even better.
I must have hit the nail on the head so close to the truth. Your response says it all LOL!
Now if everyone could do the same I wonder how long it would take for you guys to start feeding on your own? LOL
Look out ECHO24 could it be your turn in the barrel??????????
I must have hit the nail on the head so close to the truth. Your response says it all LOL!
Now if everyone could do the same I wonder how long it would take for you guys to start feeding on your own? LOL
Look out ECHO24 could it be your turn in the barrel??????????
Back up the claims.....
Please show one instance of me trying to have speedy banned?
speedy has simply migrated to a forum that protects and encourages group-think, good-ole-boy protection and doesn't allow for critical thinking, or questioning of someone else's "opinion", whether said opinion is demonstrably wrong or not.
speedy doesn't have me on ignore because of what I've said here, he has me on ignore and has migrated over there because he does not enjoy any favor with moderation here. Pretty simple, really. As I said before, he is not ignoring me at all, he is more interested in my posts than ever, evidenced by his cutting and pasting and aggressive campaign to have me banned. Trolling in its most basic form, just like your posts.
For you to take his side and try to claim it is anything other than I describe is just more evidence of your true colors and motivations.
Look in the mirror.
Astro
#247
Senior Member

Yesterday all love and kisses, Happy Thanksgiving to all! CHEERS!... Today, "wretched humans", "deplorable". The most bat dung crazy is the little man thinking I'm conspiring to get him banned.
He can rack up the troll/insult/gossip post count all he wants. It's a banning offense on RCGroups. And if RCU operated like RCG this place would be the same black hole of carbon copy opinions. We just had our moderator strolling down memory lane in a several-post exchange about boats. Real boats, not even RC. Anyone suffer a forum injury they need to report?
He can rack up the troll/insult/gossip post count all he wants. It's a banning offense on RCGroups. And if RCU operated like RCG this place would be the same black hole of carbon copy opinions. We just had our moderator strolling down memory lane in a several-post exchange about boats. Real boats, not even RC. Anyone suffer a forum injury they need to report?
#249

My Feedback: (3)

Andy we know. The problem is there are some who only hear what they want to hear. Like the Hog claiming some nonsence about me trying to ban him. Come on he's not worth the effort. Like Speedy has bčn doing it's intertaining to see the Hog getting bent out of shape when Speed just doesnt rise to the bait.
#250

Thread Starter

If you reread my question above, I asked if you, as an EC member, are proud of the way AMA members are working to manufacture reasons to ban other AMA members on RCG? We're also well aware that Jim G is tight with AMA, given his status as a CD. Are you proud that a CD is banning members for, at best, questionable reasons. After all, some of us are banned for what others are allowed to do freely. I mean there was an AMA members that set up an entire thread to attack me. The AMA CD that owns the site allowed that.
So, are you proud? Is the AMA so fragile that it's "direct agents" ... i.e. CD's ... ban people?