Why does the AMA have to grow?
I have read countless arguments on countless threads about "Why the AMA is not growing" but I have a question with another view....Why does the AMA have to grow? A business/corporation needs to grow to pay its shareholders, and in turn grow year after year to provide dividends again year after year. But does the AMA really "need" to grow? It is by mission statement a "non profit organization" so it doesn't need to show a profit or pay its shareholders, so why so much interest/concern put on "growing". Doesn't it do what it is was originally designed to do without an increase in membership? I am not asking this sarcastically, but would appreciate posts stating why a lot of posters feel the "need" for the AMA to grow. And PLEASE lets not let THIS thread become about the IRS status of the AMA, that is the farthest thing from what I am asking here......
|
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
I'm sort of a collectivist, I suppose. The AMA is the official recognized model aircraft organization in the USA. With parkfliers, etc, there is an increasingly large segment of people in model aviation who are not AMA members. There is concern that these "outlaw" people may unknowingly do harm to all of model aviation. This is one reason. The other is that the AMA offers benefits to AMA members (sanctioend competitions, official national and world records, etc.) which are not available to the non AMA modeler.
I saw my second parkflier a couple of weeks back, flying on the soccer field next to our control line club field. |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
The only reason I can come up with is that increased numbers = increased clout. Other than that I see no need to wine, dine, cajole and change to attract a group (Parkies)thatare notoriously reluctant to join the AMA at any cost or benefit. Same goesfor the terminally malcontent.
Wow, Jim Tomerson. You have spotted the rare and elusive park flyer? I have yet to see one even though I keep a sharp eye out for them. Do they come out at dawn or do they congregate at dusk? |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
So far both you guys are thinking along the same lines that I am. I still would like to hear from the guys that are always saying the AMA isn't growing. You must have reasons you think it should grow?.....
|
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
AMA has to pay employees and the Executive Director gets paid in the six figures. The greatest source of income is from membership dues. AMA lost 30,000 members in the past few years. Multiply $58 times 30,000.
Fliers1 |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
ORIGINAL: tinner1 I have read countless arguments on countless threads about ''Why the AMA is not growing'' but I have a question with another view....Why does the AMA have to grow? A business/corporation needs to grow to pay its shareholders, and in turn grow year after year to provide dividends again year after year. But does the AMA really ''need'' to grow? It is by mission statement a ''non profit organization'' so it doesn't need to show a profit or pay its shareholders, so why so much interest/concern put on ''growing''. Doesn't it do what it is was originally designed to do without an increase in membership? I am not asking this sarcastically, but would appreciate posts stating why a lot of posters feel the ''need'' for the AMA to grow. And PLEASE lets not let THIS thread become about the IRS status of the AMA, that is the farthest thing from what I am asking here...... Maybe growing is just a part of the natural process and when they are not hitting their marks they don't feel they are growing. Most for profit business can make a profit but if they don't make more profit the next year they consider that not growing. I am thinking if you make a profit why does it always have to be more than last years? |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
Is this about Growth, or stopping shrinkage?
Lots of things we can guess are behind Muncie wanting the shrinkage to stop: If we paid ~50 folks ~$2.5mil salaries for ~150k members how many of them paid muncie folks are we gonna have to fire if we drop to 70k members? Its the oldest story in the book, cut spending or raise |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
I am not sure why it is not growing,maybe because of all of the job loss we have seen in the last 3 or 4 years . I have been a member for a long time and i hope my sons and their sons or daughters can have a ama in the future to belong to when iam gone. K-bob we meet at dusk at my club field friday night and fly park flyers ,and old timers too !
|
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
Is this about Growth, or stopping shrinkage? |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
ok,
I can repackage my comment to fit that Some folks could see a need for AMA to grow to justify creating more salaried Job For Life positions for former EC fellows |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
The ama needs to grow to replace us in the hobby,if it does not get new members it means that people who were interested enough in the past are not getting interested now. The hobby is the same the people have changed . joe
|
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
KidEpoxy
My post wasn't aimed at you. I agree'd (your post #7) that an increase in members is needed to meet growing economic venues. Who gets that money is another thread altogether....I just "in general" am trying to keep this thread "on topic". So far opinions and facts have been posted, and no personal attacks! GREAT!!! Luchnia I guess some consider growth as not always being financial returns. |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
joe,
If I understand you correctly, you are saying growth to replace lost members is needed to keep the AMA "alive"? Kinda like growth is good but we have to at least keep refreshing lost membership. |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
ORIGINAL: joebahl The ama needs to grow to replace us in the hobby,if it does not get new members it means that people who were interested enough in the past are not getting interested now. The hobby is the same the people have changed . joe Well, simple replacement of us old farts dying off does not require growing. It could be a zero sum game. We lose one and gain one. No net growth, yet the organization survives. |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
Yep to both tinner and to keep our hobby alive. With out our type of hobbys arfs and rtf are going to take over soon . Its just not in the hobbys either ,I was a carpenter for 30 years and from what i have seen coming out of my union latly there are very few craftsmen left and getting fewer and fewer every year. People dont know how or dont have time to craft any thing any more ,or thats their excuse. If they are taught or seen hand built planes they might want to learn how to build one . just my thoughts and you might not agree . I can say i have done my best to get new blood in the hobby and the ama and not just talked about it here on the forums. joe
|
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
Tinner do you think it needs to grow,stay the same or loose members till it goes away . Some thought from you on this? joe
|
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
Sounds like the TRS-80 clubs shortly after the IBM-PC was introduced. Face it, ARFs and RTFs are here to stay and that is the way most people getting into the hobby are going.
|
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
I rest my case ,lol tinner ,and they are getting in to the ama for the cheap insurance too.lol I got off topic and i am sorry tinner ,It seems i cant post any thing without a ferret finding me . good bye to all and good bye. joe
|
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
I am betting if it weren't for the insurance many of the hardline AMAers would quit.
|
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
ORIGINAL: dbcisco Sounds like the TRS-80 clubs shortly after the IBM-PC was introduced. Face it, ARFs and RTFs are here to stay and that is the way most people getting into the hobby are going. I think there might be a growth problem for AMA going forward and it is hard to call I am sure. For some of us I think it is just a wait and see attitude. I do believe in promoting the hobby, whether AMA is the key to that, I am simply not sure at all. |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
Hi Joe,
I would LOVE to see the AMA grow, HOWEVER after being a member for 50 years I see it as staying about the same. Over time it gains a few members, then loses some, but it is still here, and I hope it always will be. If it does need to grow for any reason, IMHO, that is for the reason that was stated by K-Bob, increased clout. The more members we have the better chance we have of someone taking us seriously. As long as the general public see us as a small group, we will get treated as such. And I agree with some posters who don't want to make drastic changes just to get the parkfliers and new people involved. "Giving away the farm" is no way to keep it and make it grow. The ones that would be brought in by lower dues, special memberships etc, won't stay the course. Over time it has been my experience that people don't "take up" modeling for a hobby. They are modelers who have found model airplanes. I have taught many people to build and fly, but only a handful stay with it a long time. And most modelers I know don't just do airplanes, they do cars, trains, and even painting. All things creative. I love ALL forms of modeling, and if you or others have read my posts on other threads, you know I do everything I can to get kids/people involved. But lets face it we are sort of an "underground" hobby. I wish I had a nickle for every person I took with me to the field and showed what RC/modeling was about. They are ALL ALWAYS impressed and say it is way more interesting than they thought. Unfortunately we are looked at as adults playing with toys by the general public. What they see are the ready to fly, sometimes "toy" airplanes that kids fly and they think we do the same. And because of the remoteness of our fields, we are sort of "underground". I don't blame the AMA for that image but rather the publics ignorance. If a person doesn't do something, they are not prone to support that activity. I know a lot of people who hate golfers, I golf but don't pay any attention to them. Lets face it modeling, RC to be specific, is a rough hobby to belong to. It takes time and dedication to stay in it and not quit. Todays youth doesn't have the staying power in very much, so the future of the AMA is always in question. I'd love to see it grow, but I don't think it "HAS TO" just to servive. I've been in it 50 years, and for 50 years there have been those that say the AMA is dying......But it is still here. Bet you're sorry you asked me to elaborate on my views...... |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
The AMA could continue to exist even if it eventually shrinks down to a single insurance agent operating out of a broom closet and serving 100 members.
|
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
As usual a post comes up about the AMA being about insurance, which is one small part of the AMAs purpose. I have never seen anyone post the number of AMA members that fly something BESIDES RC, like control line, free flight, rubber powered, towline glider, hand launch glider, indoor hand launch, jet assist, penny plane, peanut scale, etc etc. You get the picture. I'm sure a guy flying indoor microfilm didn't join for the insurance, and would still be a member if it were dropped.
AGAIN can we PLEASE keep the comments to "Why does the AMA have to grow". There are other threads to discuss those other topics, Thank You. |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
ORIGINAL: tinner1 Bet you're sorry you asked me to elaborate on my views...... I think the AMA is a decent org, but I am not sure I would have joined had it not been a requirement for me to fly at the local clubs. As a matter of fact, I don't think I would have joined. As I stated in another form, I am neither for nor against the AMA. I sort of would like to see some competition for the AMA as that would be healthy and if there were any "deadbeats" they would have to get off of it and jump to the challenge [X(] :D |
RE: Why does the AMA have to grow?
ORIGINAL: joebahl Yep to both tinner and to keep our hobby alive. With out our type of hobbys arfs and rtf are going to take over soon . Its just not in the hobbys either ,I was a carpenter for 30 years and from what i have seen coming out of my union latly there are very few craftsmen left and getting fewer and fewer every year. People dont know how or dont have time to craft any thing any more ,or thats their excuse. If they are taught or seen hand built planes they might want to learn how to build one . just my thoughts and you might not agree . I can say i have done my best to get new blood in the hobby and the ama and not just talked about it here on the forums. joe I think that the main group that has left the AMA and the hobby are probably those who fly the ARF and RTF's. They grow bored, and leave, pretty much as they came. The die hard builders are not going anywhere. The AMA does not need to grow, any more than a club needs to grow. More members mean more ability to hire people to work in Muncie, and with fewer members, you see some employees out of work. I don't build and fly model airplanes in order to provide employment for anyone in Indiana. What would be wrong with a smaller, leaner AMA? Maybe one that would actually consider that the membership means something other than an annual check for 58 bucks. Bill, AMA 4720 |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:54 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.