NEW GP Eagle 580 Matt Chapman GP/EP ARF
#1

Thread Starter
My Feedback: (61)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Niceville , FL
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

I wanted to see what everyone thought about this one. This is not the 50" electric only, but a 53" glow/electric with a plug in stab. Might be fun with a 61 or 91 two stroke.
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis,
CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Looks very good. I told myself Iwas done with smaller glow planes but it looks like I may end up with one of these and maybe the new .60 size Reactor Bipe.
#3

My Feedback: (8)

Why do people do that? Take a glow/electric plane in a certian size and double the glow engine requirement, especially if it's ment to be electric as well, they usually end up being factory lightened pretty substationally. I would assume that a 90 on this plane would give you unlimited vertical for a little bit before the firewall rips out. go with a good 46-55 tops 2 stroke and enjoy it. That's my 2 cents on the power department.
#4

Thread Starter
My Feedback: (61)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Niceville , FL
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Throttle management is the key. You can always throttle back, harder to gain power. This plane is going to come in at around 5.75-6 # that's asking a lot out of a .46-55.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis,
CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Depends on how you want to fly it. .46-AX would be a good sport engine, .55-AX would be even better. More 3D type aerobatics would likely be better with a larger 4-stroke.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis,
CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

For some reason I just don't like pilot figures. People always say my planes need them but Ijust think they look goofy for some reason.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis,
CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Took mine out of the box tonight. Pretty much perfect covering and looks to be a very well designed and built airplane. I plan on doing the assembly this weekend.
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nutley,
NJ
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

I dont either!
ORIGINAL: ChuckW
For some reason I just don't like pilot figures. People always say my planes need them but I just think they look goofy for some reason.
For some reason I just don't like pilot figures. People always say my planes need them but I just think they look goofy for some reason.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: MosmanNSW, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

ORIGINAL: planebuilder66
Why do people do that? Take a glow/electric plane in a certian size and double the glow engine requirement, especially if it's ment to be electric as well, they usually end up being factory lightened pretty substationally. I would assume that a 90 on this plane would give you unlimited vertical for a little bit before the firewall rips out. go with a good 46-55 tops 2 stroke and enjoy it. That's my 2 cents on the power department.
Why do people do that? Take a glow/electric plane in a certian size and double the glow engine requirement, especially if it's ment to be electric as well, they usually end up being factory lightened pretty substationally. I would assume that a 90 on this plane would give you unlimited vertical for a little bit before the firewall rips out. go with a good 46-55 tops 2 stroke and enjoy it. That's my 2 cents on the power department.
Sorry but I so disagree with you, specially when we are talking a well manufactured plane like from a company like Great Planes. I just purchased this model off Tower Hobbies and it's perfectly suited to a larger motor. I owned the old GP Matt Chapman Cap and ran a 55AX in and I can assure you it needed a bigger motor.
I'm going with a .75 AX in this spinning a 14x6 prop and I'm certain the fuselage is strong enough for an engine that size. I'll keep everyone posted on the maiden; just awaiting a the delivery of a pitts muffler. Can't wait to throw this baby around.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis,
CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

OK, mine is all done.
I have a question for anyone who has actually flown it though regarding the recommended CG. Mine is just slightly tail heavy, balancing about 5/16 back from the recommended spot. I know I'd likely end up moving it back there anyhow but not sure about it on the first flight. I really can't shift anything and I want to avoid adding lead if I can. So has anyone moved the CG back and how does it fly?
I have a question for anyone who has actually flown it though regarding the recommended CG. Mine is just slightly tail heavy, balancing about 5/16 back from the recommended spot. I know I'd likely end up moving it back there anyhow but not sure about it on the first flight. I really can't shift anything and I want to avoid adding lead if I can. So has anyone moved the CG back and how does it fly?
#15

Thread Starter
My Feedback: (61)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Niceville , FL
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Flew it extensively. I can say it flies ok with CG that far back, but as with most caps landing is trouble. For the first few flights I would at least put it in the recommended range.
Do you have the Battery under the cowl? and where is your rudder servo?
Oh and cut that 3oz pilot out of it !!!!!!!!
More pics!!!
Do you have the Battery under the cowl? and where is your rudder servo?
Oh and cut that 3oz pilot out of it !!!!!!!!
More pics!!!
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis,
CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Yes, battery is on the engine box and rudder servo is in the forward position. I'd like to take the pilot out, may work on that tonight. That may actually help with CG, I never thought of that.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis,
CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Flew it today. CG was a non-issue. In fact, it may be slightly nose-heavy. When I put it into 45 degrees vertical and roll inverted in falls out pretty quickly. Not immediately but doesn't continue that far either. Seems to fly good where it is at though so I'll keep it there for a while and see how I like it after a few flights.
It was super stable and smooth, very maneuverable and didn't seem to want to tip stall when slowed down; I only got it to stall straight forward. Knife-edge seemed to want to roll opposite of rudder but didn't pull the belly or canopy. I'll get more adventurous with it in the next few flights.
The YS-63 pulled it great. I used an APC 12x6 and it was very fast with respectable vertical.
So far I am very happy. We'll see how I feel in a few weeks/months.
It was super stable and smooth, very maneuverable and didn't seem to want to tip stall when slowed down; I only got it to stall straight forward. Knife-edge seemed to want to roll opposite of rudder but didn't pull the belly or canopy. I'll get more adventurous with it in the next few flights.
The YS-63 pulled it great. I used an APC 12x6 and it was very fast with respectable vertical.
So far I am very happy. We'll see how I feel in a few weeks/months.
#19
Member
My Feedback: (37)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toledo,
OH
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Hey guys I have one of these on the build table and am going with a 4 stroke OS .81. I really would like to fly some light to moderate 3D with this plane. What would you guys recommend for a prop on the OS .81?
Also has anyone mounted there rudder servo in the tail or is every one pretty much using the forward servo tray location? Just curious to see where everyone is mounting there rudder servos.
Thanks guys!!
Also has anyone mounted there rudder servo in the tail or is every one pretty much using the forward servo tray location? Just curious to see where everyone is mounting there rudder servos.
Thanks guys!!

#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis,
CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

I would save the rudder servo installation until you have everything else done. That way you can determine where the best place is to put it based on balance.
#21
Member
My Feedback: (37)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toledo,
OH
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

ORIGINAL: ChuckW
I would save the rudder servo installation until you have everything else done. That way you can determine where the best place is to put it based on balance.
I would save the rudder servo installation until you have everything else done. That way you can determine where the best place is to put it based on balance.
That is what I have done. Rudder servo is not yet installed.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Clovis,
CA
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

I found out that it WILL tip stall yesterday. got it too slow on an approach and it dropped the right wing. Luckily I was high enough to somewhat recover and only suffered a scratched wing tip. On the subsequent landings I made sure to keep the speed up.
Other than that it has been great. It is a good all around sport plane in my opinion.
Other than that it has been great. It is a good all around sport plane in my opinion.