![]() |
Page R2 Gee Bee
I just ordered an Adrian Page 60 size Gee Bee R2. He mentioned that this plane was designed for a Saito 91. I am having a hard time deciding between the Saito 91, Saito 100 and OS 91. I am leaning towards the Saito 100 since it is less than 1oz heavier than the 91. Any thoughts on this combination? Any suggestions on considering something else? Thanks in advance.
|
RE
I know this is the ARF formum, this post started talking about an ARF, but I edited my first message to be more accurate.
|
RE: Page R2 Gee Bee
Dean320
I would go with the saito, for the 4 stoke sound. I always go with the bigger engine, it's easier to throttle down a little than not having enough power. Although there isn't much difference between the two engines. |
RE: Page R2 Gee Bee
I'm done framing up the wings on mine.. this kit is really nice once you figure it out :) All of the parts line up perfectly!!! (so far) I'm putting an OS 91 surpass in mine.. ol' reliable ;)
|
RE: Page R2 Gee Bee
Dean320,
I'd recommend the Saito 100. I built the Page GeeBee R2 and used my 100 in it. Fantastic combo. Flew really light althought I don't remember my all up weight anymore. Check the strength and stiffness of the wood for the horizontal stabilizer, I lost mine due to high speed flutter when I tried to race a VooDoo Mustang. In my case, the wood was soft and I didn't use a long enough control horn. Since the elevator doesn't need to move much on this plane, I'd recommend using a long control horn and a short servo arm, or use the inner hole on the arm. You'll like this plane, Adrian did a great job of designing light. Anyone interested in fiberglass wheel pants? I bought them from Adrian but lost the plane before I ever got around to installing them. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:04 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.