![]() |
Wing volume loading
Does anyone know where to get formula for Wing volume loading
NOT wing loading ( a different animal ! ) Can you show example how to work out? Thanks Ron |
Wing volume loading
Wing Volume Loading formula
Generally speaking, the lower the number the "better". WVLs between 8 to 9 are "great" for aerobatics, 9 to 10 are acceptable for aerobatics (my rule of thumb but not in stone). 10 - 12 are good for sport planes. 12 - 14 are ok for heavy metal warbird planes (scale in general probably). 4 to 6 are for sailplanes. numerator = weight in ounces denominator = wing area in square feet raised to the 1.5 power This is the way I was told to do it. Divide the wing area by 144 (assuming wing area is only known in square inches) and write that number down and label it A for area. Clear the calculator and then find the key labeled x^y on the calculator (microsoft's calculator will show you this key only if you put it into scientific view). Put in the A number, hit the x^y key once, put in 1.5 hit the x^y key once again. Write that number down too and let's call it the D number. Clear the calculator again. Divide the number "16" by the D number, write down the answer and call it the N number. Now take the weight of the plane (or any weight you want to use) in pounds and multipy the N number by it. Experiment with different weights to see how light or heavy you can go to get your plane in the 8 to 10 category (less is better). |
work it out!
BIg Thanks
Did not know how to work out the power 1.5 thing ! Took a little wile working with scientific calc .// You spelled it out perfectly ! What I new turned out That I gotta shave 1 lb to to get to 10 /// To get good aerobatics ! I think 8 0z won't be to bad to do,, but a full lb will require some work! I take it by aerobatic you include 3d capable aircraft also 3d //// ??? I DO have enough THRUST @ 28+lbs Good flyin Ron |
Wing volume loading
rctt, don't put too much faith in this, it's good for a general base line but by no means is it the law. There are many other things that have even greater effect on how a plane flies that it doesn't take into consideration. For instance, airfoil thickness and shape, aspect ratio, CG size of the control surfaces, and the list goes on. Keep it as light as you can and go have fun.
|
Wing volume loading
Glad i could help you.
The figures look good,10 is better, but as stated, this for formula is really only a guideline, does not take into consideration the factors Outcast mentioned. I think your good to go. Robert |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:24 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.