RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   ARF or RTF (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/arf-rtf-75/)
-   -   Tiger 60 (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/arf-rtf-75/2245269-tiger-60-a.html)

nanbecbro 10-11-2004 06:29 PM

Tiger 60
 
I have a Saito 91 FS that I would like to put in a Tiger 60. Several older members of my club, with much more experience, have indicated that they thought it was to much engine for the plane and suggested a 70 size FS. The plane is rated up to a 80 size four stroke. I'm not into 3D and am looking at for a basic plane with some acrobatic capabilities. Thanks in advance for any advice.

Dewey2 10-11-2004 07:22 PM

RE: Tiger 60
 
use the 91 the guys that told you that are 99% chance they fly 10 pound cubs on os 40 fs's :D its a big plane needs a big engine i think i got a tower 75 in mine

lewdfinger 10-12-2004 12:34 AM

RE: Tiger 60
 
I agree with prophanger. I flew one of our club member's Tiger 60s with a .90 4-stroke and it was perfect. I liked it so much I'm thinking of putting one together this winter for my daughter. Well, OK, for me.

KD

R84n 10-12-2004 01:14 AM

RE: Tiger 60
 
I flew my brand new Tiger 60 with a Saito 91 for
the first time this weekend. It was fantastic !

rcflyertwo 10-12-2004 08:28 AM

RE: Tiger 60
 
[8D]I have an os 91fs II surpass four stroke in mine, its set up as a taildragger. It flies great, not overpowered at all. It takes off in about 10feet. I can cruise at half throttle all day long. it sounds good, runs good, is fairly areobatic. It balanced great with the four stroke also. put it in and enjoy it!!:D Butch in Niagara Falls

rcfury 10-12-2004 01:07 PM

RE: Tiger 60
 
What size fuel tanks are you using with those big motors? That for what I know they like to eat fuel. And there isn't a whole lot of room in the tiger 60 for a big tank.

jrf 10-12-2004 02:53 PM

RE: Tiger 60
 
A 91 running at reduced throttle settings will use less fuel and make a whole lot less noise than a 70 running at full throttle. If you can learn throttle control, the ONLY reason NOT to use a bigger engine would be extra weight.

In your case though, a 91 four stroke weighs less than the 61 two stroke that the Tiger 60 was designed for. Putting a 70 in that airplane would be a decision you would surely regret.

Jim

IShootSharpStix 10-12-2004 03:18 PM

RE: Tiger 60
 
I put a Saito FA-100 in mine and it is great! I squeezed a 14 oz tank in and am currently getting 9 minute flights, although I have less than 2 gallons of fuel through it, and am still running very rich.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.