![]() |
Sig Extra 300XS
First post on this forum. Would like to know if anyone has own or flown a Sig extra 300XS?
Would like to know about its slow speed flying,tracking,stability, and landing. Am thinking about an OS 1.60FX for the bird. Thanks |
RE: Sig Extra 300XS
ORIGINAL: sonny_92 First post on this forum. Would like to know if anyone has own or flown a Sig extra 300XS? Would like to know about its slow speed flying,tracking,stability, and landing. Am thinking about an OS 1.60FX for the bird. Thanks http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=370940 http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=196132 http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=3361242 http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=1535775 |
RE: Sig Extra 300XS
Thanks for the help!
|
RE: Sig Extra 300XS
1 Attachment(s)
I had this with the FX 1.60. Was a great plane. Landed like a trainer. And I'm not kidding either. Had a Bisson pitts. Was a very stable flyier. Very good quality arf. The 1.60 was enough for me since I didnt hover or do any 3D stuff. It would do everything I wanted. You wont find a sweeter running engine. NEVER had a deadstick with it, and that was with no on-board glow either. I sold it cause I'm into warbirds now, but I really miss it. Feel free with any questions.
Dan |
RE: Sig Extra 300XS
Still flying mine. Had a ST 2000 (1.20) and flew ok. Now has a ST 2500 (1.50) and is much better. I also had the Cap 231EX. Both are great flyers.
|
RE: Sig Extra 300XS
I think you help me make up my mind.Thanks very much. Sonny
|
RE: Sig Extra 300XS
I had one with a Brison 2.4 in it. All I can say is AWSOME ! I sold it to a guy in Vegas and I regret it : (.
I (at the time) had never done a harrier landing. This plane did it with ease ! You will be very happy. CJ |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:56 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.