![]() |
Crash Nextstar
I have a Nexstar aircraft that I would like to take all the components out and add it to an ARF aircraft. Which one out there will suit my need? I am looking for one that has the less mechanical changes.
|
RE: Crash Nextstar
|
RE: Crash Nextstar
Sig LT-40 the best trainer without a doubt. Make it a tail dragger and it's the perfect trainer. As you get better just increase the throws, it will become you favorite plane.
Did you ever notice how when you flew the Nexstar slow with the nose high your ailerons stopped working? It doesn't happen with the LT-40. |
RE: Crash Nextstar
|
RE: Crash Nextstar
The Tower plane is good too, no LT-40, but one of the better trainers. I'd pay the extra money and get the best. I don't like the Avastars or RCM trainers types, stick with a plane that has a flat bottom wing for really good slow flight. If you've gotten almost to soloing maybe a big UlgyStick type plane, big planes fly better, big light planes fly best.
|
RE: Crash Nextstar
Thanks for all the info on selecting the aircraft. I'll look at them both and then decide which one. This will be my first one putting together.
|
RE: Crash Nextstar
I think you will find the LT40 superior to the Nextstar in sturdiness?
|
RE: Crash Nextstar
ORIGINAL: w8ye I think you will find the LT40 superior to the Nextstar in sturdiness? |
RE: Crash Nextstar
My LT-40 is a tail dragger naturally with a OS 52 engine.
It was originally nose wheel with a Tower 46 |
RE: Crash Nextstar
I put 13~14 engines on my LT-40, my favorite was a Saito 50, like the OS 52 a perfect match.:D For two strokes I liked the OS 40 LA the best, the OS46 was good, but the LT-40 is a plane that likes to fly on the wing not the prop. I had a OS 61 FX? in it, it took off in 3 feet, went straight up out of sight, but I killed the feel of the Kadet.
|
RE: Crash Nextstar
Yes, I actually didn't like the Tower 46 on the LT-40. I always thought the engine to have enough power to tear the wings off. (I wasn't enjoying flying that fast) and with the throttle back a little the engine had a rich midrange. It was frustrating. So I change the engine. It was a bolt in swap. The mounting holes were the same.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:23 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.