Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
Reload this Page >

Whats with the aerodynamics on foan planes

Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

Whats with the aerodynamics on foan planes

Old 10-19-2013, 06:48 AM
  #1  
carl24bpool
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Blackpool, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Whats with the aerodynamics on foan planes

Guys,

I was looking through some images from my local flying club web site and came accross an image of a foam plane which was essentially a 30mph speed sign (a disc) which flew.

The foam wings were just sheet foam cut to shape with no curved top or bottom to create the classic wing profile.

So how do these planes create lift if not with the wing?

I always assume hte elevator must be trimmed down to create lift or essentially create a slightly upward angle of attack for the entire plane.

Is that correct?

Foam is cheap so I fancy having a dabble to see what stupid stuff I can make. Maybe even an actual plane shape too!!
Old 10-19-2013, 07:19 AM
  #2  
Rob2160
Senior Member
 
Rob2160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by carl24bpool
Guys,

I was looking through some images from my local flying club web site and came accross an image of a foam plane which was essentially a 30mph speed sign (a disc) which flew.

The foam wings were just sheet foam cut to shape with no curved top or bottom to create the classic wing profile.

So how do these planes create lift if not with the wing?

I always assume hte elevator must be trimmed down to create lift or essentially create a slightly upward angle of attack for the entire plane.

Is that correct?

Foam is cheap so I fancy having a dabble to see what stupid stuff I can make. Maybe even an actual plane shape too!!
A flat plate is capable of developing lift and you are correct, it requires angle of attack to do so.

Lift is a reaction force, a flat plate can deflect air downwards and this deflection has an equal and opposite reaction that is lift and drag.



A flat plate can generate lift, but an aerofoil shape does it far more efficiently.

These videos might help.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zV06PgxarW0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyjQSEKZoA0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFO4PBolwFg

Last edited by Rob2160; 10-19-2013 at 07:31 AM.
Old 10-19-2013, 04:13 PM
  #3  
H5487
 
H5487's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

These videos are great! I remember back in college (never mind how far back that was!) when my professor was reciting the same, tired explanation of lift being entirely the result of faster air over the top of a wing. Angle of attack didn't come into the picture until he explained stalls. When asked about how symmetrical airfoils worked, he was at a loss for words. Plus, I already knew from flying my hand out my mom's car window that angle of attack had a lot to do with creating lift. I think these new explanations are right on!

Harvey
Old 10-19-2013, 05:05 PM
  #4  
Rob2160
Senior Member
 
Rob2160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by H5487
These videos are great! I remember back in college (never mind how far back that was!) when my professor was reciting the same, tired explanation of lift being entirely the result of faster air over the top of a wing. Angle of attack didn't come into the picture until he explained stalls. When asked about how symmetrical airfoils worked, he was at a loss for words. Plus, I already knew from flying my hand out my mom's car window that angle of attack had a lot to do with creating lift. I think these new explanations are right on!

Harvey
Yes I agree with you, I was working as a flight instructor in the late 80's at a flying school owned by a former fighter pilot. We taught lift theory exactly as in the above videos and we were all considered "Heretics" by other flying schools for not using the standard Bernoulli explanation..

When questioned on it.. the "play on words" reply was "Bernoulli sucks"

The CFI is retired now but has released a series of free e-books that are full of great information

http://www.flybetter.com.au/

Last edited by Rob2160; 10-19-2013 at 05:10 PM.
Old 10-19-2013, 05:55 PM
  #5  
Charlie P.
 
Charlie P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Crane, NY
Posts: 5,117
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Thrust and incedence - the same way the F-104 Lightning and F-4 Phantom worked.
Old 10-27-2013, 01:42 PM
  #6  
Lnewqban
 
Lnewqban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 4,057
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by carl24bpool
..............Foam is cheap so I fancy having a dabble to see what stupid stuff I can make. Maybe even an actual plane shape too!!
Lift is nothing without stability:
http://adamone.rchomepage.com/index5.htm

Any imaginable flying shape must have it:
http://www.geistware.com/rcmodeling/...calc/index.htm

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.