Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 confusing imperial system >

confusing imperial system

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

confusing imperial system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2005 | 05:57 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kopavogur, ICELAND
Default confusing imperial system

I need a spinner nut for one of my planes but I do not understand the measurements given by tower hobbies

for example

SPECS Shaft Size: 1/4-28
Weight: 4oz
Diameter: 1"
Length: 1.5"

( http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...8&I=LXL715&P=K )

what is 1/4-28 in metric and is this both the shaft diameter and lenght?


also


SPECS Shaft Size: 8x1.25mm
Weight: 2oz
Diameter: 7/8"

( http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...8&I=LXL736&P=K )

I'm guessing that the eight is the diameter but what does 1.25mm describe?



The engine I need this for has a 6.2mm diameter and without the prop and all it´s 32.8
in length, what would that be in that system?

(also I know the links to those nuts isn´t maby what fits the engine but they are examples)
Old 03-11-2005 | 06:22 PM
  #2  
exeter_acres's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Johns Creek, GA
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Yes..it is all too confusing.....

which engine is it for.... that might be quicker....

I'm sure someone here has it and would know right away which spinner is better.....
Old 03-11-2005 | 06:28 PM
  #3  
Scar's Avatar
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Peoria Hts, Il. IL
Default RE: confusing imperial system


ORIGINAL: center of the universe

I need a spinner nut for one of my planes but I do not understand the measurements given by tower hobbies

for example

SPECS Shaft Size: 1/4-28
Weight: 4oz
Diameter: 1"
Length: 1.5"

( http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...8&I=LXL715&P=K )

what is 1/4-28 in metric and is this both the shaft diameter and lenght?


also


SPECS Shaft Size: 8x1.25mm
Weight: 2oz
Diameter: 7/8"

( http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...8&I=LXL736&P=K )

I'm guessing that the eight is the diameter but what does 1.25mm describe?



The engine I need this for has a 6.2mm diameter and without the prop and all it´s 32.8
in length, what would that be in that system?

(also I know the links to those nuts isn´t maby what fits the engine but they are examples)
¼ - 28 is a standard SAE thread, with a quarter inch shaft diameter and 28 threads per inch. No metric nut will fit those threads.

M8 x 1.25 is a Metric standard for an 8mm diameter shaft. The thread pitch is 1.25 mm per thread.

Are you sure that 6.2mm shaft isn't actually a quarter inch? There are thread pitch gauges made in metric and SAE, with which you can determine the threads.

Good luck,
Dave Olson
Old 03-11-2005 | 06:55 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kopavogur, ICELAND
Default RE: confusing imperial system

ORIGINAL: exeter_acres

Yes..it is all too confusing.....

which engine is it for.... that might be quicker....

I'm sure someone here has it and would know right away which spinner is better.....
well I can't be sure 'cos I don´t have the engine or the manual but if my memory serves my right then it is a .52 4-stroke engine


ORIGINAL: Scar
¼ - 28 is a standard SAE thread, with a quarter inch shaft diameter and 28 threads per inch. No metric nut will fit those threads.

M8 x 1.25 is a Metric standard for an 8mm diameter shaft. The thread pitch is 1.25 mm per thread.

Are you sure that 6.2mm shaft isn't actually a quarter inch? There are thread pitch gauges made in metric and SAE, with which you can determine the threads.

Good luck,
Dave Olson
well now that you say so it is probably a quarter inch shaft



that about covers it, thanks people
Old 03-11-2005 | 06:56 PM
  #5  
-pkh-'s Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Emmaus, PA
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Yeah, they don't make a 6.2mm... just a 1/4" and a 6mm... take a look at these two Dubro spinner nuts, Tower lists the compatible engines on each of these pages... these Dubros are one of the best spinner nuts IMO...

[link=http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXE158&P=7]Dubro 1/4-28 Spinner Nut[/link]

[link=http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXE160&P=7]Dubro 6mm Spinner Nut[/link]
Old 03-11-2005 | 07:03 PM
  #6  
exeter_acres's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Johns Creek, GA
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Hmmm...might be putting the cart before the horse......

I would think you would want the engine....or at least know which one it is, before you bother with the spinner.....

but that is just me
Old 03-11-2005 | 07:13 PM
  #7  
-pkh-'s Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Emmaus, PA
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Umm... sounds to me like he's already got the engine...
...The engine I need this for has a 6.2mm diameter...
Old 03-11-2005 | 07:46 PM
  #8  
exeter_acres's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Johns Creek, GA
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Now I'm confused


From post #4:

well I can't be sure 'cos I don´t have the engine or the manual but if my memory serves my right then it is a .52 4-stroke engine
Old 03-11-2005 | 11:54 PM
  #9  
-pkh-'s Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Emmaus, PA
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Haha! Me too... didn't see his second post... my post hit 40 seconds after his second post, so I never saw it until now!
Old 03-12-2005 | 07:39 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kopavogur, ICELAND
Default RE: confusing imperial system


ORIGINAL: exeter_acres

Now I'm confused


From post #4:

well I can't be sure 'cos I don´t have the engine or the manual but if my memory serves my right then it is a .52 4-stroke engine
what I meant to say is that I can't be sure because I don't have the engine with me or the manual
Old 03-12-2005 | 10:44 AM
  #11  
Test005's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ţo, FINLAND
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Hi
I'm Swedish and have he same dilemma with the Imperial vs. metric conversions.
If you buy both the engine and spinner nut from Tower hobbies, you don't need to know the meassurment in metric, just buy the 1-4/28 spinner nut if that's th same meassurment as the prop shaft of your engine. (You can find many engine manuals online on the manufacturers websites)

Something I must advice you to buy if you'll ever build a kit is the "Hobbico builders ruler".
This thing is the most useful builder tool for us 'non-imperial' kit builders building a US made kit.

Just pick up a dowel or wood part and testfit it in the ruler, until it fits a slot, all slots are marked with the Imperial meassurment, perfect!



Old 03-12-2005 | 12:45 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Hi!
Well, nearly all 3,5cc-8,0cc engines use this 1/4x28 axle tread dimension. It is only MVVS and Rossi (Nova Rossi) that use a metric thread (6mm, 7mm or 8mm).
As has been said before; 1/4" is the diameter of the axle in inches and 28 is the treads per inch.(Inch is tum in Swedish).
Hope the world could get rid of the inch system soon!
If you want an aluminum spinner nut I can make one for you.

Regards!
Jan K
Sweden
http://hem.passagen.se/airracing
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Nk27728.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	43.3 KB
ID:	242621   Click image for larger version

Name:	Bw71718.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	30.9 KB
ID:	242622   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ze86224.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	32.7 KB
ID:	242623  
Old 03-12-2005 | 01:48 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: confusing imperial system

1/4-28 means that the outside diameter of the shaft is 1/4 inch. The 28 means that there are 28 threads per inch, i.e. if you turn the nut 28 turns it will progress up the shaft 1 inch. Gosh, wouldn't it be nice if everyone adopted the metric system, life would be so much easier.
Old 03-12-2005 | 02:23 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kopavogur, ICELAND
Default RE: confusing imperial system


ORIGINAL: Rodney
Gosh, wouldn't it be nice if everyone adopted the metric system, life would be so much easier.
I bet if the French wouldn´t have invented it then the Americans and the British would be using it


and I found an old nut that is 1/4-28 and it fits perfectly, now I know for sure what size I'm looking for

also put one of those rulers in my order, it'll come in handy

and one question since I have this thread here, do heavy spinner nuts make much of a difference on idling?
Old 03-12-2005 | 04:52 PM
  #15  
Test005's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ţo, FINLAND
Default RE: confusing imperial system

.
Old 03-12-2005 | 04:54 PM
  #16  
Test005's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ţo, FINLAND
Default RE: confusing imperial system

I can just say that you'll find that ruler handy many times when you read an instruction book or blue print and it says "use the 1/16-28 XYZ Dowel"

I think a heavy spinner nut is more for balancig (and good looks), than having any major impact on idling.
A longer prop though shoud improve idling since the engine gets loaded with more g-force and want to tick over again and again and again.... (Inertia? )
Old 03-12-2005 | 04:58 PM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kopavogur, ICELAND
Default RE: confusing imperial system

well my airplane is also tail heavy so....

and isn't inertia sorta the same thing as momentum?
Old 03-12-2005 | 05:44 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Yes a heavy hub does slightly help lower the minimum idle speed.
Old 03-12-2005 | 05:52 PM
  #19  
Test005's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ţo, FINLAND
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Lesson 1: Newton's Laws of Motion
Inertia and Mass
Newton's first law of motion states that "An object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force." Objects "tend to keep on doing what they're doing." In fact, it is the natural tendency of objects to resist changes in their state of motion. This tendency to resist changes in their state of motion is described as inertia.


Inertia = the resistance an object has to a change in its state of motion.
Newton's conception of inertia stood in direct opposition to more popular conceptions about motion. The dominant thought prior to Newton's day was that it was the natural tendency of objects to come to a rest position. Moving objects, so it was believed, would eventually stop moving; a force was necessary to keep an object moving. But if left to itself, a moving object would eventually come to rest and an object at rest would stay at rest; thus, the idea which dominated people's thinking for nearly 2000 years prior to Newton was that it was the natural tendency of all objects to assume a rest position.
Old 03-12-2005 | 06:40 PM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kopavogur, ICELAND
Default RE: confusing imperial system

I did a little search about momentum

"Momentum can be defined as "mass in motion." All objects have mass; so if an object is moving, then it has momentum - it has its mass in motion. The amount of momentum which an object has is dependent upon two variables: how much stuff is moving and how fast the stuff is moving. Momentum depends upon the variables mass and velocity. In terms of an equation, the momentum of an object is equal to the mass of the object times the velocity of the object."

sorta the same thing isn´t it
Old 03-12-2005 | 08:28 PM
  #21  
Test005's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ţo, FINLAND
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Sure sonds same but there's gotta be a twist to it.
I guess we'll get some more input on this one as soon as a RC-flying, physics professor dropps by
Old 03-12-2005 | 08:46 PM
  #22  
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Aurora, SD
Default RE: confusing imperial system

Momentum is energy that a mass has that is in motion.
Inertia is resistance to a change in velocity.
A heavy hub doesn't have alot of inertia for its weight(mass) because it is small in diameter. A hub that has more of it's weight(mass) in it's outer circumference has more inertia(like a flywheel). The heavy hub does not effect the idle much because of it's relatively low inertia.[&:]

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.