Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 ball links >

ball links

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

ball links

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2006 | 07:25 PM
  #1  
JollyPopper's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mountain Home, AR
Default ball links

You folks have convinced me to try ball link connectors in place of or in conjunction with screw lock connectors. I see Tower lists both 1/16" threaded studs and 2-56 threaded studs. Which fit the holes in servo arms and throttle arms? Which is larger, 2-56 threads or 1/16 threads, and/or what is the decimal value of 2-56 threads? I believe 1/16 would be .062. Thanks, guys.

Max
Old 01-10-2006 | 10:42 PM
  #2  
carrellh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Garland, TX
Default RE: ball links

2-56 is slightly bigger than 1/16. I think it's about 5/64, but it might be closer to 3/32.

1/16 = .0625
5/64 = .078125
3/32 = .09375

The factory holes in servo arms are usually 1/16.
Old 01-11-2006 | 07:43 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,749
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Zachary, LA
Default RE: ball links

The 1/16th will fit nicely in Futaba servo horn holes.

IIRC, JR horns have slightly larger holes. For sure, if you use the 2-56, you will have to enlarge the holes in either. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but be aware of it.
Old 01-11-2006 | 09:57 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Davis, OK
Default RE: ball links

You definitely wont regret using the ball links, it makes for a much nicer installation, and less chance of binding on your control surfaces.
Old 01-11-2006 | 10:46 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: ball links

Get the threaded ones and get yourself a 2/32 tap to tap the holes in the servo arms. Much better fit that way with absolutely no slop.
Old 01-11-2006 | 08:38 PM
  #6  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pittsfield, MA
Default RE: ball links

ORIGINAL: Lowlevlflyer

You definitely wont regret using the ball links, it makes for a much nicer installation, and less chance of binding on your control surfaces.
[size=2]Can a ball-link be used for a nosegear control linkage?
size]
Old 01-12-2006 | 11:47 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Davis, OK
Default RE: ball links

I dont have anything that has nosegear, but I would assume a ball link could be used on nose gear linkage just the same as on the other linkages.
Old 01-12-2006 | 12:59 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,701
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Memphis, TN
Default RE: ball links


ORIGINAL: Rodney

Get the threaded ones and get yourself a 2/32 tap to tap the holes in the servo arms. Much better fit that way with absolutely no slop.
Thinking you may have meant 2x56 tap?
Old 01-12-2006 | 04:11 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: FL
Default RE: ball links

You are correct Bruce, sorry for the gross error.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.