Lanier Traveler 20 ARF?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

I noticed this smaller 20 sized "trainer" and it looks to fit my needs nicely. I'm a newb and was wondering what you guru-types thought of this ARF as a starter plane. I read someone on here had a grizzly tray problem but I was hoping I could get more input on this plane.
Concerning sub-40 sized trainers in general: I understand that planes get small in a hurry, there's a bigger impact in wing loading with the weight of the radio hardware in these sized models, and smaller planes are affected more by wind, but are there any other drawbacks to the smaller planes as trainers other than these issues?
Thanks in advance guys, you've already been unbelievable helpful since day one of lurking here!
Concerning sub-40 sized trainers in general: I understand that planes get small in a hurry, there's a bigger impact in wing loading with the weight of the radio hardware in these sized models, and smaller planes are affected more by wind, but are there any other drawbacks to the smaller planes as trainers other than these issues?
Thanks in advance guys, you've already been unbelievable helpful since day one of lurking here!
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)

As you said, planes get small in a hurry. While I occaisionally love some 20 size planes for just boring holes in the sky with, They are trickier for all of the reasons you mentioned.
Now I'm not saying don't get one for starters, But personally, I like to see someone start with a 40 size plane. 60 is better yet, if cost is not a factor (and it very often is with new people). A 40 size gives you (IMHO) the best of both worlds, it is large enough to be seen, they fly well, and they won't gouge the wallet as bad as a larger plane.
Also, a 40 is the most popular size at most fields, so you can often find some good deals on used equip.
Now I'm not saying don't get one for starters, But personally, I like to see someone start with a 40 size plane. 60 is better yet, if cost is not a factor (and it very often is with new people). A 40 size gives you (IMHO) the best of both worlds, it is large enough to be seen, they fly well, and they won't gouge the wallet as bad as a larger plane.
Also, a 40 is the most popular size at most fields, so you can often find some good deals on used equip.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Thanks for the input guys. Yeah, sure seems that the 40s are the size of choice. Actually, I was actually ready to sink my money into another Cub ARF but learned about ground looping and Cub quirks. It was then that I also learned why I take off in planes like the bf-109 goony bird style in combat sims.... thought I'd look for the trike setup to be safe.
Just curious, what would you say is the biggest downfall to starting with a smaller sized trainer? Is it the visability?
Just curious, what would you say is the biggest downfall to starting with a smaller sized trainer? Is it the visability?
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (20)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Fries,
VA
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Visibility is a big factor... You might have trouble with orientation (knowing the direction, speed, and altitude of the model). Just curious, what's the biggest factor making select a 20 size trainer? the Sig Seniorita is a wonderful .20 to .25 size Trainer... and the .40 size Traveller is very good as well.