![]() |
RE: Hobbico Avistar
> "Now is that some form of "new aerodynamics" like the once spouted "new math"? "< no its not a form of new aerodynamics. I just found that a slightly nose down position works best for my style of flying. If you are a 3d aerobatic type flyer then a completly level position may work better for you. A 2" nose down position on a airplane with a 50" fuselage is not that far off completly level and just assures that the plane is not tail heavy. Works for me anyway. :D
|
RE: Hobbico Avistar
Fatsky: A 2" nose down position on a airplane with a 50" fuselage is not that far off completly level and just assures that the plane is not tail heavy. Works for me anyway. Those determinations are new items/subjects and foreign to my years of studies within the field of Applied Aerodynamics. Since I have left that field for some years, after 41 years involvement, I suspect I am not up-to-date on the latest theories. Thanks for any help. [:-] |
RE: Hobbico Avistar
I want to recommend the Tower Hobbies 46 engine
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...&I=LXJA86&P=ML On a review that was done a couple of years back, it was considered the second best overall engine. With the extended Tower warranty, it is a great buy. ORIGINAL: Fewski I just bought the Hobbico Avistar. Was wondering what motor I should use.... a .40 or .46? Would the .46 be to much power, or would the .40 be underpowered? I have never flown before, and will be flying off water... I'm thinking .46 so it can get up to speed with all the water drag. Thanks! :) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.