Notices
Dub Jett Engines Support Bob Brassel of Dub Jett Engines provides direct support here for Jett Engines.

BSE .76L

Old 05-10-2011, 02:06 PM
  #1  
panhndl
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Guymon, OK
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default BSE .76L

I sent an email to Jett, but thought I'd post here as well just in case someone had something they wanted to add.

I had a Hanger 9 P-51D PTS to start my flying career and thought I would like to have the Hanger 9 40 size P-51D with retracts that is available now.

http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products...ProdID=HAN4440

I thought a good engine for this plane might be a BSE .76L with a 3 or 4 blade Zinger prop.

http://www.zingerpropeller.com/3_bladed_Propeller.htm
http://www.zingerpropeller.com/4_bladed_propeller.htm

If I matched up the power output of the 14 x 4W recc'ed by Jett and got about the same RPM's and load on the engine, would there be anything wrong with that engine/prop selection? I can't think of any, but I'll be the first to admit that there is a lot I don't know about prop load, engnes, and planes. Basically, I'm looking to have a sort of scale looking warbird in a smaller size than is normally available. Having a super speedster isn't the overall goal, but I thought that the added blades might require a little more oomph. Also, keeping th RPM low could sound really cool.

The formula I use for prop load is D x D x D x P x (SQUARE ROOT(N-1)) where D = diameter of the prop, P = pitch of the prop and N = number of blades. I don't know that this is exact, but it's what I've been using.

If Jett rec's a 14 x 4W 2 blade prop, how does one account for the wide prop? Is it close to a 14 x 5 or a 14 x 6? Or do I need to do something else?

Any insight or suggestions would be gladly considered.
Old 05-11-2011, 06:25 AM
  #2  
bob27s
My Feedback: (19)
 
bob27s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: BSE .76L

Hi,

Thanks for writing. Sounds like a fun application.

Yes, you can run the multi-blade props. I have tried the Zinger 12x6 x 3 on the 76L and it worked well with the Tubro-Jett muffler, and seemed to work ok with the lite muffler too. I have also used the master airscrew 3 blade 12x6. There is NOTHING to be gained in performance it was for a "look cool" application only. But it can work. Key is finding a prop to let the engine run around 10,000 rpm ground peak.

My personal favorite prop for the 76L, with the turbo-jett muffler on it, is a standard blade 14x4. Also partial toward 13x6 Vess. Big prop, lower rpm (around 10,000-11,000). Quiet.... very slow scale performance.

Having said that.......
My old reliable VQ P-51 similar in size to the H9 .40 size, is powered by a SJ-46 combined with a turbo-jett muffler. (photos are posted in a few places in this forum and in a few threads). I run a 12x4 prop on that setup. PLEANTY of power there... and a nice installation.

For your inquiry, the SJ-60L and turbo combination would be AMAZING in this new bird! (not the 60LX, standard version). You may find this better for the P-51 in general. You could try the multi-blade prop, if you select one that will let the engine turn over 13,000 rpm ground peak. The turbo-jett is the key gives you such a broad torque band that the engine accomodates more prop mass/loading.

You can see both the SJ-46 and BSE-76L installations here...
http://www.jettengineering.com/accy/turbo.html


Old 05-11-2011, 08:02 AM
  #3  
panhndl
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Guymon, OK
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: BSE .76L

Thanks for the information. I'll look at the 60L, but I'll probably opt for the BSE :-) I hadn't noticed that the 76 needed a bigger sized Turbo-Jett muff, but it might complicate the fit in the cowl. You're advice is much appreciated.

At ground peak, you suggest over 13,000...to what max? 14,000?

And I wasn't looking for the engine to generate massive speed. I think it will be PLENTY of power, regardless, but I was thinking that lower RPM's and higher CC's would be nice for quieter/more scale sound as well as needed to turn the heavier prop for fast speed when wanted.
Old 05-16-2011, 01:28 PM
  #4  
bob27s
My Feedback: (19)
 
bob27s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: BSE .76L

There really is no max RPM with the 60L ... mainly want to keep it where it works best in a torque setup with the turbo-jett.

Let me know how you make out !

Bob

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.