MK17 radio carb
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MK17 radio carb
Last summer I've tried to make a radio carburetor for my MK17, and that experience was quite succesfull, so I'd like to share it for someone who might consider to make a radio carb for their engines too (not only for MK17). So this is like another experience into an overall collection
The design is a typical two-needle radio carb. Overal dimensions of carburetor were designed as small as possible to fit between it's rear cap and plane's engine mounting frame. The diameter of ventury was taken from the stock ventury insert of MK17, and it is 4 mm. Using two cone drills straight cylindrical channel was shaped to match "ventury" shape
Into this carburetor case a typical rotating barrel with guide groove inserted. It fixed with machined 2 mm screw
At the opposite side of this barrel a nozzle inserted into carb on 4mm thread. Nozzle hole is 0.8 mm which is sufficient for 1.5cc diesel fuel feed
Two needles are inserted via 2.5mm thread
Both needles sealed tight with polyamide machined washers
So the final device looks like this:
This carb is inserted into MK17's rear tube for stock insert. The tube is cutted for as close as possible displacement of carburetor to crank case of the engine
After several improvements the performance is quite good and stable. Max RPM is ~11500..12000, idle 5000..5500 RPM. Transition between max and min is reliable (depends on needles setup)
The first long run
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=BG1OgNoPTfE The first flight (max RPM unreliable because of muffler on MK17)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=jZ-ExXIQ6SA Intermediate results without muffler. This time MAX RPM is quite reliable. Also idle was setup a bit lean, and it sounds like a motorcycle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&list=UUjc-OpouW36kRi_WFGkxopQ&v=Tti28n44JTs So the conclusion I've got is MK17 is very reliable engine by itself (not taking into account stock nozzle). I've runned two different MK17 engines with this carb and the performance was almost the same on the whole RPM range. Also "carbureted" engine lifetime resource is at least doubled (runned already 9 hours without significant signs of engine wearing. However it depends on piloting style)
Next I'll try this (with reduced ventury) on my Cox049 diesel version
The design is a typical two-needle radio carb. Overal dimensions of carburetor were designed as small as possible to fit between it's rear cap and plane's engine mounting frame. The diameter of ventury was taken from the stock ventury insert of MK17, and it is 4 mm. Using two cone drills straight cylindrical channel was shaped to match "ventury" shape
Into this carburetor case a typical rotating barrel with guide groove inserted. It fixed with machined 2 mm screw
At the opposite side of this barrel a nozzle inserted into carb on 4mm thread. Nozzle hole is 0.8 mm which is sufficient for 1.5cc diesel fuel feed
Two needles are inserted via 2.5mm thread
Both needles sealed tight with polyamide machined washers
So the final device looks like this:
This carb is inserted into MK17's rear tube for stock insert. The tube is cutted for as close as possible displacement of carburetor to crank case of the engine
After several improvements the performance is quite good and stable. Max RPM is ~11500..12000, idle 5000..5500 RPM. Transition between max and min is reliable (depends on needles setup)
The first long run
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=BG1OgNoPTfE The first flight (max RPM unreliable because of muffler on MK17)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=jZ-ExXIQ6SA Intermediate results without muffler. This time MAX RPM is quite reliable. Also idle was setup a bit lean, and it sounds like a motorcycle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&list=UUjc-OpouW36kRi_WFGkxopQ&v=Tti28n44JTs So the conclusion I've got is MK17 is very reliable engine by itself (not taking into account stock nozzle). I've runned two different MK17 engines with this carb and the performance was almost the same on the whole RPM range. Also "carbureted" engine lifetime resource is at least doubled (runned already 9 hours without significant signs of engine wearing. However it depends on piloting style)
Next I'll try this (with reduced ventury) on my Cox049 diesel version
Last edited by vsv123; 11-26-2014 at 11:02 AM.
#5
vsv123
These Chinese mini-lathe are inexpensive but very usable for a knowledgeable machinist, is your the same as that?
http://www.mini-lathe.com/
These Chinese mini-lathe are inexpensive but very usable for a knowledgeable machinist, is your the same as that?
http://www.mini-lathe.com/
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
vsv123
These Chinese mini-lathe are inexpensive but very usable for a knowledgeable machinist, is your the same as that?
http://www.mini-lathe.com/
These Chinese mini-lathe are inexpensive but very usable for a knowledgeable machinist, is your the same as that?
http://www.mini-lathe.com/
It is possible to machine small parts after strong tweaking this lathe, however, it takes a lot of time to produce with a suitable machining quality. And the spindle ball bearings are awful
The lathe you've shown is actually a pretty good lathe, comparing to what I own. However it requiries a garage or something, at least much more table space I can afford
Last edited by vsv123; 11-28-2014 at 11:22 AM.
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thing copes with aluminium 7075 (my carb made of) and brass pretty well, but I did not try to machine steel and other metals
Last edited by vsv123; 11-29-2014 at 12:12 AM.
#9
Decades ago someone in Canada was advertising home made carburetors for the MK 17 in RC Modeler. I bought one, and the Russian engine worked very well with the Canadian carburetor.
#12
The Cox QB .074 might also be usable with minor mod.:
http://coxengines.ca/cox-.074-queen-bee-carburetor-assembly.html
http://coxengines.ca/cox-074/
http://coxengines.ca/cox-.074-queen-bee-carburetor-assembly.html
http://coxengines.ca/cox-074/
#14
I found that a Thundertiger RC carb fits the intake spigot on some of my 2.5cc Russian engines. They have .07, .10 and .15 sizes that would work. If I remember correctly I was using the .10 size carb on one of my engines. I made a pinch bolt for mounting the carb in place of the OEM venturi.
I had been running this one for a while and it was accumulating a lot of messiness of course.
I had been running this one for a while and it was accumulating a lot of messiness of course.
#15
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the same setup as shown on photo, the engine will not work properly on the maximum power output with stock 7x4 prop. I've got such insert as in the photo. It does not work at Max RPM and Min RPM without retuning needle. Either it will run too rich and stop working in idle, or it will not develop max power
Last edited by vsv123; 02-21-2015 at 12:14 AM.
#17
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not "not much" it is an air screw MK17 was designed for
Now take a look here
The manual says:
Max power output with 5mm ventury insert at 12000 RPM = 0.15 HP
Whatever prop. you set, power output (efficiency) will be lower at lower RPM and thrust will be lower as well
Now take a look here
The manual says:
Max power output with 5mm ventury insert at 12000 RPM = 0.15 HP
Whatever prop. you set, power output (efficiency) will be lower at lower RPM and thrust will be lower as well
Last edited by vsv123; 02-21-2015 at 08:33 AM.
#18
Sorry, my experience with diesels only goes back to the early fifties.
I usually run diesels with at least an inch larger prop than I would with a glo engine of similar displacement.
In the case of an RC carb equipped diesel I go with a larger club for a flywheel effect.
Please excuse my ignorance but my MK-17 with OS Carb ran pretty well on a larger prop.
I usually run diesels with at least an inch larger prop than I would with a glo engine of similar displacement.
In the case of an RC carb equipped diesel I go with a larger club for a flywheel effect.
Please excuse my ignorance but my MK-17 with OS Carb ran pretty well on a larger prop.
#19
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hervey Bay Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My MK17 fitted with the nylon propeller supplied with it and an ENYA .09 air bleed R/C carb.
Fitment is reversible - no changes made to engine at all. Needle valve assembly removed and replaced with a plain stove bolt cut down to 7 mm length and a locking nut and washer to effect an air tight seal. The end face of the bolt presses upon and securely retains the carb spigot.
I could not get a reliable low speed under 5,500 RPM.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1hzKEfD4-0
Fitment is reversible - no changes made to engine at all. Needle valve assembly removed and replaced with a plain stove bolt cut down to 7 mm length and a locking nut and washer to effect an air tight seal. The end face of the bolt presses upon and securely retains the carb spigot.
I could not get a reliable low speed under 5,500 RPM.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1hzKEfD4-0