Heavy or Light
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: CanberraACT, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heavy or Light
The aim of this group as far as I can tell is to make the fastest model through a speed trap.
Has it been decided yet whether it is best to use a light model which accelerates quickly or a heavy model which can build up momentum in a dive.
If the aim is to achieve 200mph I reckon this could be obtained fairly easily with a high performace (low drag glider ) with only a simple low power engine to get it to height. (Then either dropped /folding prop /retracted).
Designs based around pylon racers are designed for quick turns and will therefore have more drag than is really required.
My assumption is that a heavy model will be fastest.
Has it been decided yet whether it is best to use a light model which accelerates quickly or a heavy model which can build up momentum in a dive.
If the aim is to achieve 200mph I reckon this could be obtained fairly easily with a high performace (low drag glider ) with only a simple low power engine to get it to height. (Then either dropped /folding prop /retracted).
Designs based around pylon racers are designed for quick turns and will therefore have more drag than is really required.
My assumption is that a heavy model will be fastest.
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Heavy or Light
The heavy model won't be able to sustain speed very long in level flight. For those of us who don't see much value in purely gravity assisted speed records, the European format is the definitive way to measure a prop driven planes' worth.
If you do your best to scratch build a sleek model out of the best materials and make it just strong enough to withstand the forces of flight, the end product will probably be a speed plane that you wish could have come out even lighter if some things were done differently. Building heavy is easy, it is something that anyone can do.
If you do your best to scratch build a sleek model out of the best materials and make it just strong enough to withstand the forces of flight, the end product will probably be a speed plane that you wish could have come out even lighter if some things were done differently. Building heavy is easy, it is something that anyone can do.
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oceanside,
CA
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Heavy or Light
It's a combo of drag and surface loading of the wing. If you have more wing area than needed to maintain lift, it's just extra drag. But if you're wing is too small then it flies at too high AOA and you loose efficiency. To figure it out to the enth degree requires a degree I don't have. I say more power and make sure you can land it to do it again.
#4
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Heavy or Light
From what I have seen of the European's speed attempts, they do use gravity assist (dive) to achieve their high speeds. Otherwise they would never get the engines on the pipe with the heavy props used. Since most of them tend to use the FAI guidelines, they are somewhat weight limited to 75 grams/dm^2. That puts it around 24.57 oz/ft^2
I reject the idea that a span limited airframe will be the fastest in their operating format, as the induced drag when pulling out of the dive will be significant and they do need to carry the speed through the traps which is a distance of 656 ft.
I reject the idea that a span limited airframe will be the fastest in their operating format, as the induced drag when pulling out of the dive will be significant and they do need to carry the speed through the traps which is a distance of 656 ft.
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Merced, Ca.,
CA
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Heavy or Light
Colborne:
The aims and goals of this group vary somewhat for each of us. It is much easier to determine the common goals rather than the various avenues to reach those goals. First and foremost is to build and fly something fast for the same reasons some would drive a Hugo while others perfer a Corvette, Fararri or Porshe. To attain their goals, some would stuff a 90 into a sleek 40 size airframe and power their way to speed. Suttle others will design there own sleek birds looking to go fast with a reasonable size engine and get their speed through airframe design. Othere are simplty lost souls not completely at home with the pylon crowd who are generally limited in dimensions, and seek the pure bird design capable of both speed and turning/flying ability, sort of the best of all worlds. Then there are the rules pushers who club race and are looking for ways and means to go faster within the given rules and specifications. Its sort of hard for the rules committee to outlaw a sleek airframe that they see doing torque rolls after practising on the pylons with the same airplane. The same group will jump all over the guy who claims the improbable, yet will praise the outstanding work and concepts of others with equal gusto. Yes, the brotherhood is a group of missfits, strange and unusual, yet wonderful people who share the common bond of speed from all over the world. Enjoy the diversity.
The aims and goals of this group vary somewhat for each of us. It is much easier to determine the common goals rather than the various avenues to reach those goals. First and foremost is to build and fly something fast for the same reasons some would drive a Hugo while others perfer a Corvette, Fararri or Porshe. To attain their goals, some would stuff a 90 into a sleek 40 size airframe and power their way to speed. Suttle others will design there own sleek birds looking to go fast with a reasonable size engine and get their speed through airframe design. Othere are simplty lost souls not completely at home with the pylon crowd who are generally limited in dimensions, and seek the pure bird design capable of both speed and turning/flying ability, sort of the best of all worlds. Then there are the rules pushers who club race and are looking for ways and means to go faster within the given rules and specifications. Its sort of hard for the rules committee to outlaw a sleek airframe that they see doing torque rolls after practising on the pylons with the same airplane. The same group will jump all over the guy who claims the improbable, yet will praise the outstanding work and concepts of others with equal gusto. Yes, the brotherhood is a group of missfits, strange and unusual, yet wonderful people who share the common bond of speed from all over the world. Enjoy the diversity.
#6
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Waseca,
MN
Posts: 8,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Heavy or Light
It really depends on How Much Heavier, and where is that weight coming from?
If your trading a few ounces for a stiffer airframe, it may be beneficial to do so.
I agree, Slightly Heavier may be faster, but only if that extra weight is used in a manner to deaden the vibrations of the motor through the airframe.
If your trading a few ounces for a stiffer airframe, it may be beneficial to do so.
I agree, Slightly Heavier may be faster, but only if that extra weight is used in a manner to deaden the vibrations of the motor through the airframe.