West .50V1 bench run
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
West .50V1 bench run
[link=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWhahZdRxfw]West .50V1 test run[/link]
Been tuning the header/Mac's pipe setup. Turns out I was flying too long before, no wonder I thought the Demon was slow. This is running nicely on the 8.0x9.25 flight prop now, so I'll cut back on pitch and bring ground rpm up to 20 - 20.5k and tune the system to that. Then fly it on the heavier pitch props. Time for an IMC on this one too..
MJD
Been tuning the header/Mac's pipe setup. Turns out I was flying too long before, no wonder I thought the Demon was slow. This is running nicely on the 8.0x9.25 flight prop now, so I'll cut back on pitch and bring ground rpm up to 20 - 20.5k and tune the system to that. Then fly it on the heavier pitch props. Time for an IMC on this one too..
MJD
#3
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: West .50V1 bench run
No, not really. It wasn't wet with fuel at the time, there were no bumps, and I had some sort of a hold on the prop as I pulled it through compression as I recall. The fuel draw is modest like that, notice I had to pop the end of the pipe to get enough fuel in.
EDIT: nope. I watched - I was doing this by habit so I had to think about it. I hold the prop firmly as I turn it through compression, then the quick turning motion is the not-so-hazardous half of the cycle where I bring around to the compression stroke again and grip it to pull through.
It does sound pretty good on the open pipe. The Demon howls in the air with this one. This is a prelude to putting it back on the Demon in better tuned form and getting radar on it.
MJD
EDIT: nope. I watched - I was doing this by habit so I had to think about it. I hold the prop firmly as I turn it through compression, then the quick turning motion is the not-so-hazardous half of the cycle where I bring around to the compression stroke again and grip it to pull through.
It does sound pretty good on the open pipe. The Demon howls in the air with this one. This is a prelude to putting it back on the Demon in better tuned form and getting radar on it.
MJD
#5
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: West .50V1 bench run
Not the right kind of prop. The West is a stormer in the 19-21k range, those props are intended to be spun faster than that. They use less pitch than I do on this, but spin it more than that ratio faster by a large margin.
MJD
MJD
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: south, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: West .50V1 bench run
what happens, if it spins to fast? damage ?or does it just max out at max rpm?
I thought keeping the rpm up was good.
I've been looking unsuccesfully for those pylon race props here. Shops just seem to stock standard apc sizes.
If its not worth it, i want bother looking anymore
I thought keeping the rpm up was good.
I've been looking unsuccesfully for those pylon race props here. Shops just seem to stock standard apc sizes.
If its not worth it, i want bother looking anymore
#9
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: West .50V1 bench run
That head is mostly air, it's kind of a helicopter-ish cooling head. If you trimmed it down on the lathe it would probably look normal.
mkI: revs are good, but if the porting and timing of the engine result in the volumetric efficiency going downhill past the point where the increasing rpm times the diminishing torque no longer results in a power gain - then you have exceeded the design potential of the motor as is. This engine's horsepower peak is apparently in the 21k area. If I ran it at 25k I expect the motor would hold up fine, but I also would expect to find that 25k/21k rpm increase times the (torque at 25k)/(torque at 21k) decrease would result in less power output. Unless I modified the motor to breath at those rpm. Power = speed.
The idea is to burn as much fuel/air mixture per second as you can, so revving higher does of course increase that potential courtesy of repetition, but if the engine can maintain some breathing efficiency. The design parameters that allow it to do so make it more and more of a special purpose engine as you climb in performance potential. The old rule of never getting something for nothing applies once more. The MB40 for example ingests and burns enormous amounts of fuel/air mixture at 30-33k or whereever it runs, but try to run it at what, 16k?, and see what happens. One day we'll have the universal .40. Oh wait, that's a hipo electric ([X(]).
MJD
mkI: revs are good, but if the porting and timing of the engine result in the volumetric efficiency going downhill past the point where the increasing rpm times the diminishing torque no longer results in a power gain - then you have exceeded the design potential of the motor as is. This engine's horsepower peak is apparently in the 21k area. If I ran it at 25k I expect the motor would hold up fine, but I also would expect to find that 25k/21k rpm increase times the (torque at 25k)/(torque at 21k) decrease would result in less power output. Unless I modified the motor to breath at those rpm. Power = speed.
The idea is to burn as much fuel/air mixture per second as you can, so revving higher does of course increase that potential courtesy of repetition, but if the engine can maintain some breathing efficiency. The design parameters that allow it to do so make it more and more of a special purpose engine as you climb in performance potential. The old rule of never getting something for nothing applies once more. The MB40 for example ingests and burns enormous amounts of fuel/air mixture at 30-33k or whereever it runs, but try to run it at what, 16k?, and see what happens. One day we'll have the universal .40. Oh wait, that's a hipo electric ([X(]).
MJD
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
RE: West .50V1 bench run
I don't have a Weston, but if someone with one gets some timing numbers, I'll get some numbers from my Webra .50 GT. Unless they have Webra do special runs of liners and possibly cranks just for them, these engines could be nothing more than "tweaked", with possibly the combustion chamber opened up, liner raised, crank port closing timing increased, bottom end fits checked, bearings upgraded, etc.
IIRC, I did check mine once and saw nothing really astounding...just a good quality engine.
IIRC, I did check mine once and saw nothing really astounding...just a good quality engine.
#11
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: West .50V1 bench run
ORIGINAL: proptop
The Webra .50 is .900 bore X .780 stroke, so it's over square...
Just exactly what are the differences between the Weston and a stock Webra .50?
The Webra .50 is .900 bore X .780 stroke, so it's over square...
Just exactly what are the differences between the Weston and a stock Webra .50?
It was too cold and miserable to continue today, I stuck it out far as I really felt like. But I will have another go tomorrow and see if i can't dial it right in. I was posting this mostly because I've encountered a couple of folks who have or plan to have these engines, but you don't get to see them run everyday at the club fields so I thought this might be interesting. And I might also fit the Genesis pipe and compare; the main reason I am not using the Genesis pipe on it is at the moment is that it weighs more than twice what the open pipe does, I like the bad attitude sound it has on the Demon, and the polished Genesis pipe looks really sharp on my Sprint Cat (that's a boat).
MJD
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
RE: West .50V1 bench run
MJD, that sums it up pretty good. No engine that will sit and idle all day can have the same performance potential as a pure racing engine unless it comes with timed fuel injection, close loop controlled. Some guy did a pretty exhaustive study of all the production engines to see which ones had the widest speed range and most power to weight...I think it was published 15-20 years ago in one of the mags. IIRC, the Webra .50 was in the top 3 or 4
#13
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: West .50V1 bench run
The old Aeromodeller review of the Conquest .15 RC lists it as having the highest specific power output of any RC engine to date. The Fox .74 always used to show up well on those tests, which are not skewed by the tender massage and methanol-doped bean oil they need to run.
I recall that test or at least a column on the subject. I believe the Sport Jett .46 when reviewed caused quite a stir with its speed range (6:1? >6:1?) and power output compared to the status quo.
Bob27s commented that the Jett .50LX and West .50V1 are timed for similar operating ranges. I'd imagine the SJ .50 and Webra Speed .50 are of a similar ilk as well. I'd still bet on the Jett but they're all fine engines.
MJD
I recall that test or at least a column on the subject. I believe the Sport Jett .46 when reviewed caused quite a stir with its speed range (6:1? >6:1?) and power output compared to the status quo.
Bob27s commented that the Jett .50LX and West .50V1 are timed for similar operating ranges. I'd imagine the SJ .50 and Webra Speed .50 are of a similar ilk as well. I'd still bet on the Jett but they're all fine engines.
MJD
#14
My Feedback: (8)
RE: West .50V1 bench run
Your Weston sounds pretty good to me
I don't have any Westons but I've got a couple of .50GT's
Most I've seen is 14,700 with an APC 10X7 and stock muffler, on 10%, which hauls my Tower Kaos along nicely.
Mike...what is the I.D. of the Weston's venturi? Stock Webra .50 (and .61 Speed ) is 8mm
I don't have any Westons but I've got a couple of .50GT's
Most I've seen is 14,700 with an APC 10X7 and stock muffler, on 10%, which hauls my Tower Kaos along nicely.
Mike...what is the I.D. of the Weston's venturi? Stock Webra .50 (and .61 Speed ) is 8mm
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: south, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: West .50V1 bench run
Weston new 52v1 available. The 50v1 machine tool has had it.
The new 52v1 is based on webra p5 engine. I think its 346g, With LOTS of mods. It too likes the 21k band so im told .
I believe weston sell more 'West' engines than webra.!
The new 52v1 is based on webra p5 engine. I think its 346g, With LOTS of mods. It too likes the 21k band so im told .
I believe weston sell more 'West' engines than webra.!
#17
RE: West .50V1 bench run
I remember seeing a .25 sized DeHavilland Vampire on Weston's site a while back. It said it was coming soon...but I guess they dropped it? Anyone remember seeing it?
#18
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: West .50V1 bench run
Yeah, I thought I saw it in a news column in RCM&E, maybe some trade show coverage or something like that. I know I saw it. For some reason I think I recall the picture was noted as a prototype? Dunno.
MJD
MJD
#20
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: West .50V1 bench run
Unless you have scored of R&D staff, getting prototypes to production and market is never as small a job as one thinks. Let's hope it makes it through the process. Neat idea.
MJD
MJD
#22
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orangeville, ON, CANADA
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
RE: West .50V1 bench run
I ran the engine as it was yesterday, switching from an 8 x 9.25 to an 8 x 8.75. Now it was smack on and howling - the exhaust note took on that sound like the pipe would balloon if too thin. The jump in rpm confirmed it's pleasure with the shaft load - 20,400 from a grand less. I'm going to leave the pipe length exactly where it is, and fly with 8.75/9/9.25 pitchs and compare. Back into a Demon again. I'm so tickled with the way it is running, and how the new cowl looks that I might drop it in my #2 Demon which I am finishing up now as well. That one is covered in 3.7 ounce Stits and sounds like a tympani drum top and bottom, and is straight too. I have no qualms about stirring the stick hard with this one just to see what happens, there's no way I could fail it in the air; at least not due to the airframe anyway..
MJD
MJD