Four Star 60 Build...The Saga Begins
#701
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Springtown,
TX
congratulations mountaineer...
You've got a great airplane that should last you for a long time. Just don't get too overconfident with it like I did my stick the other day! (We won't go there). I've flown RTF, ARF, and KIT--KIT is BY FAR the most satisfying. Not only that, they are BY FAR the best flying. Your kit was put together so well, I guarantee you you'd notice a difference if you flew an arf. It my fly very similar, but your's is much better, and will last much longer (normal wear and tear, I'm talking). ARF's are fun, and definitely have their place, but you did the right thing here. You now know more about airplanes than you ever would have had you not built the kit! Plus, now that you have a fun flyer that isn't a trainer, you can relax on your next build. no hurry now. Get yourself a project and take your time, while you hone your skills on the four star!
You've got a great airplane that should last you for a long time. Just don't get too overconfident with it like I did my stick the other day! (We won't go there). I've flown RTF, ARF, and KIT--KIT is BY FAR the most satisfying. Not only that, they are BY FAR the best flying. Your kit was put together so well, I guarantee you you'd notice a difference if you flew an arf. It my fly very similar, but your's is much better, and will last much longer (normal wear and tear, I'm talking). ARF's are fun, and definitely have their place, but you did the right thing here. You now know more about airplanes than you ever would have had you not built the kit! Plus, now that you have a fun flyer that isn't a trainer, you can relax on your next build. no hurry now. Get yourself a project and take your time, while you hone your skills on the four star!
#702
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Vancouver,
WA
Great thread and nice job on your build and maiden flight! I like your color scheme. Thanks for taking the time to write up your build in this thread.
Just got started on my first build tonight - Sig LT-40. After reading your post on the maiden I really can't wait to get my box of sticks ready to fly.
somegeek
Just got started on my first build tonight - Sig LT-40. After reading your post on the maiden I really can't wait to get my box of sticks ready to fly.

somegeek
#703
I second what SOMEGEEK said. Thanks for taking the time to document this build. You have helped more people than you'll ever know by doing that. Congadulations on a great plane and a great thread!
#706
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Akron,
OH
Thanks for all the congrats guys! I'm really glad to hear that some of my mistakes/questions will help someone out.
This forum has been a phenomonal resource for me. There were a few times during the course of this build that I was really down, and very frustrated...and honestly ready to throw in the towl, but everyones advice and encouragement kept me going.
It would be awsome if we could all get together and fly sometime! How about an RCUniverse Fly In? Now that would be a heck of a good time
This forum has been a phenomonal resource for me. There were a few times during the course of this build that I was really down, and very frustrated...and honestly ready to throw in the towl, but everyones advice and encouragement kept me going.

It would be awsome if we could all get together and fly sometime! How about an RCUniverse Fly In? Now that would be a heck of a good time
#707

Congrats on the flights and a kit well built.
Now it's your turn to help others. Explain what your error was in measuring the CG. This may help someone avoid the same mistake in the future.
Any idea what would have happened to your plane if your friends had not found that error? New kit or major repairs most likely and a lot of disbelief on your part. If you had gone out Sunday and tried to fly alone, you would have had a wild handful on your hands. [:@] Just glad it got caught.
Bruce
Now it's your turn to help others. Explain what your error was in measuring the CG. This may help someone avoid the same mistake in the future.
Any idea what would have happened to your plane if your friends had not found that error? New kit or major repairs most likely and a lot of disbelief on your part. If you had gone out Sunday and tried to fly alone, you would have had a wild handful on your hands. [:@] Just glad it got caught.
Bruce
#708
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Akron,
OH
Not sure where my mistake was on measuring the CG. I was suspicious that I was able to get it to balance with no adjustments. The only difference is that I measured and checked my CG with the plane upside down with the arms of the cg machine on the main spar right next to the fuse. At the field, two guys stood on either side of the plane with it upright and lifted it off the ground at the main spar. Not sure if this would make a difference or not.
I had put together sort of a checklist of things that I wanted the guys at the field to look at before I flew it, and CG was on that list. I also had them check out all the control surface throws, help me set up high and low rates for the control surfaces, fine tune in the engine etc. But yeah, I'm really glad that we caught the CG problem before I flew it.
I had put together sort of a checklist of things that I wanted the guys at the field to look at before I flew it, and CG was on that list. I also had them check out all the control surface throws, help me set up high and low rates for the control surfaces, fine tune in the engine etc. But yeah, I'm really glad that we caught the CG problem before I flew it.
#710
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Austin,
TX
Mountaineer, congrats on a job well done and a beautiful bird! Glad to hear those first flights went so well. BTW...I've always had someone else first flight my birds (all ARFs to this point). Had much greater confidence in taking her up myself once one of the Old Guard checked it out for me!
Enjoy the fruits of your labor...and post some video soon for all your fans!!
Enjoy the fruits of your labor...and post some video soon for all your fans!!
#711
RCU Forum Manager/Admin
My Feedback: (9)
Mountaineer,
Here's what I do when I balance. I mark the CG as per the plans and mark that spot with a sharpie. I then use the CG machine to balance the plane. I do one thing a little different than most people, I completely assemble the plane and balance it BEFORE I cover the plane. I do this so I won't have to cut covering later down the road if I have to add weight. Of course I do a final CG check once the plane is completely covered and ready to fly.
Ken
Here's what I do when I balance. I mark the CG as per the plans and mark that spot with a sharpie. I then use the CG machine to balance the plane. I do one thing a little different than most people, I completely assemble the plane and balance it BEFORE I cover the plane. I do this so I won't have to cut covering later down the road if I have to add weight. Of course I do a final CG check once the plane is completely covered and ready to fly.
Ken
#712

My Feedback: (32)
The only thing I'm wondering about is the need for 12oz's. That seems like allot. The Saito will handle it and on a 4* it will not make that big of a difference, but if he is able to remove half of that then if he thinks it floats now, 6oz's will make a difference.
I use an OS91 Surpass on mine and needed no weight at all by stuffing a 4 cell 2700mah Expert batt up under the tank that weighs in at roughly 6oz
Here are the engine weight's
Saito 100
Engine (Only) Weight: 19.5 oz
Muffler Weight: 1.4 oz
OS91 Surpass without the pump
Weight-With Muffler: 24.2oz
So all total I have roughly a 3.5 oz heavier engine in mine and probably a 2 oz difference in battery although I'm not sure of what battery he is using
I use an OS91 Surpass on mine and needed no weight at all by stuffing a 4 cell 2700mah Expert batt up under the tank that weighs in at roughly 6oz
Here are the engine weight's
Saito 100
Engine (Only) Weight: 19.5 oz
Muffler Weight: 1.4 oz
OS91 Surpass without the pump
Weight-With Muffler: 24.2oz
So all total I have roughly a 3.5 oz heavier engine in mine and probably a 2 oz difference in battery although I'm not sure of what battery he is using
#713
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fort Mohave,
AZ
Same here on my ARF... with a Mag 91... I started with the Battery under
the tank, now it's under/behind the wing bolts.. No weights added
the tank, now it's under/behind the wing bolts.. No weights added
#714
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Akron,
OH
I have the battery up against the first former right behind the tank. I'll try sliding it under the tank to balance before I permanently add any weight.
Remember I added a second set of tri stock braces on the underside of the horizontal stabilizer/fuse, and I used a small amount of epoxy to secure them. This may have contributed to it being tail heavy.
Remember I added a second set of tri stock braces on the underside of the horizontal stabilizer/fuse, and I used a small amount of epoxy to secure them. This may have contributed to it being tail heavy.
#715

ORIGINAL: MountaineerFan36
Remember I added a second set of tri stock braces on the underside of the horizontal stabilizer/fuse, and I used a small amount of epoxy to secure them. This may have contributed to it being tail heavy.
Remember I added a second set of tri stock braces on the underside of the horizontal stabilizer/fuse, and I used a small amount of epoxy to secure them. This may have contributed to it being tail heavy.
Did the instructions say to balance upright or inverted? Or did they just give a balance point and leave it for you to determine the method?
#716

My Feedback: (32)
The 4* series all get balance inverted. According to SIG, the plane has a roughly 2:1 CG moment meaning that 1 ounce at the tail needs two ounces at the nose.
After watching your build and the fact the saito is lighter than my engine I could see 6 ounces but 12 ounces makes me curious. There is nothing wrong with that much but if you can get it lighter it should would not hurt at all
After watching your build and the fact the saito is lighter than my engine I could see 6 ounces but 12 ounces makes me curious. There is nothing wrong with that much but if you can get it lighter it should would not hurt at all
#717
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Akron,
OH
Bubba:
You got me curious to about the 12 oz. and here is what I found out.
It is indeed 6 oz. and not 12. The lead weights are the sticky type that come in a strip and say "prather" across the top. I have 6 "segments" of this strip on the nose, hence 6 oz. For some reason, I thought each section of the strip was 2 oz. not 1.
One of the guys at the field noticed that I did have some room on the engine mount to move it forward a bit if I wanted to....so I guess that is an option.
I think most likely I'll try moving the battery pack under the fuel tank as far as I can get it (it is a 4 cell NiCD 800 MAH pack BTW) Then check to see how much weight I need to add.
Once I determine the appropriate weight, I was thinking about where I could mount it. I really want to keep it out of the engine compartment, so I thought I might sheet the weight with some balsa, then glue/screw it to the underside of the compartment and then cover it so that it blends in to the fuse. You guys know of any better options than this?
You got me curious to about the 12 oz. and here is what I found out.
It is indeed 6 oz. and not 12. The lead weights are the sticky type that come in a strip and say "prather" across the top. I have 6 "segments" of this strip on the nose, hence 6 oz. For some reason, I thought each section of the strip was 2 oz. not 1.
One of the guys at the field noticed that I did have some room on the engine mount to move it forward a bit if I wanted to....so I guess that is an option.
I think most likely I'll try moving the battery pack under the fuel tank as far as I can get it (it is a 4 cell NiCD 800 MAH pack BTW) Then check to see how much weight I need to add.
Once I determine the appropriate weight, I was thinking about where I could mount it. I really want to keep it out of the engine compartment, so I thought I might sheet the weight with some balsa, then glue/screw it to the underside of the compartment and then cover it so that it blends in to the fuse. You guys know of any better options than this?
#718

My Feedback: (32)
Joe,
That's allot better. I thought 12oz's seemed a little much based on how well this thing was built
Do not move a thing unless you really want to try. 6oz would be just about right based on the engine differences and battery differences so I'd leave it alone.
You can try to stuff the battery under the tank and you may only save an ounce maybe two, which on that plane will make no difference it how it flies. 6oz's would but not one ounce. Moving the engine will require you redo your throttle linkage and based on the issues you had with it I would not even consider it.
The old adage comes to mind here. If it a broke don't fix it.
To be honest with you, I would glue them to the top of the little piece of the fuselage on the inside just in front of the firewall right under the engine, right where you have your drain hose coming from the saito or out near the end of the cheeks on the inside. You could always paint them black and they will never show.
That's allot better. I thought 12oz's seemed a little much based on how well this thing was built
Do not move a thing unless you really want to try. 6oz would be just about right based on the engine differences and battery differences so I'd leave it alone.
You can try to stuff the battery under the tank and you may only save an ounce maybe two, which on that plane will make no difference it how it flies. 6oz's would but not one ounce. Moving the engine will require you redo your throttle linkage and based on the issues you had with it I would not even consider it.
The old adage comes to mind here. If it a broke don't fix it.
To be honest with you, I would glue them to the top of the little piece of the fuselage on the inside just in front of the firewall right under the engine, right where you have your drain hose coming from the saito or out near the end of the cheeks on the inside. You could always paint them black and they will never show.
#719
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Edemonton,
AB, CANADA
Thanks for the great thread I just found it last night. Lots of great tips to help the newbie. I have just started to build a Pete'n' Poke and know that the information in this thread will be of great assistance. Congrats on the maiden flight and many more flights.
#720

You read all this in just one night? That deserves a medal in it's own right. 
If you took an average of 15 seconds per post it would have taken 3 hours to read the entire thread, not counting time waiting for your computer to update.

If you took an average of 15 seconds per post it would have taken 3 hours to read the entire thread, not counting time waiting for your computer to update.
#721

My Feedback: (32)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Marana,
AZ
It is getting rather long in the tooth, isn't it? 
I think I'll print this one up in full color and save it when I get home... this easily blows away any construction article I've ever seen.

I think I'll print this one up in full color and save it when I get home... this easily blows away any construction article I've ever seen.
#723

My Feedback: (14)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Go Riders Go!!!!!!!, CANADA
I just read this thing front to back this morning and i must say that looking at all the pictures and reading all the advice i am really impressed. I have yet to build a kit just RTF and ARF for me so far, but i'm waiting on my SIG SE kit to arrive and and going to sit down and starting building. I am going to use this story for reference (it's printing as i type) and will be asking questions as i go along . Great job Mountaineer fan that plane looks awesome. I am so glad i found this forum, i live in rural Saskatchewan and its over 3 hours to the nearest field so im on my own out here. This forum will save my long distance phone bill for sure
Geoff Bedard
Geoff Bedard
#724

Welcome to RCU. Let us know when you have a question and we will come up with at least 10 solutions on average.
Some will even work.
Have any of you guys that live in the middle of nowhere ever considered moving?
Some will even work.Have any of you guys that live in the middle of nowhere ever considered moving?
#725
RCU Forum Manager/Admin
My Feedback: (9)
ORIGINAL: bruce88123
Welcome to RCU. Let us know when you have a question and we will come up with at least 10 solutions on average.
Some will even work.
Welcome to RCU. Let us know when you have a question and we will come up with at least 10 solutions on average.
Some will even work.


Ken


