DL-50 engine
#252

My Feedback: (198)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: El Reno, OK
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

ORIGINAL: yarom
Walbro 201b
Walbro 201b
ORIGINAL: rcairmike
looking forward to seeing more post on this motor as it looks as though not enough people have alot of time on it.can anyone tell me what the carb number is assuming it is a walbro carb.i my self fly da50 and da100.althought they are pricey they perform great.would like to pick up a dl50 to put in a winter plane im building now.can anyone here that is using a throttle curve tell me how well the transition of the motor is around hover point.just to let the previous poster know.the first time you put gas thru a new motor (carb) its diaphram is dry.making its pump function less.once you get the diaphram wet with gas it will pump just fine.a easy way to prime the carb is ,ignition off,place finger over carb opening or full choke.rock the prop back and forth past the compression stoke.(ignition off) this will draw fuel in instead of flip the prop continously.
looking forward to seeing more post on this motor as it looks as though not enough people have alot of time on it.can anyone tell me what the carb number is assuming it is a walbro carb.i my self fly da50 and da100.althought they are pricey they perform great.would like to pick up a dl50 to put in a winter plane im building now.can anyone here that is using a throttle curve tell me how well the transition of the motor is around hover point.just to let the previous poster know.the first time you put gas thru a new motor (carb) its diaphram is dry.making its pump function less.once you get the diaphram wet with gas it will pump just fine.a easy way to prime the carb is ,ignition off,place finger over carb opening or full choke.rock the prop back and forth past the compression stoke.(ignition off) this will draw fuel in instead of flip the prop continously.
I have engines with each.
None that I have had the 201b.
#253

My Feedback: (198)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: El Reno, OK
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

ORIGINAL: drewbags
Yarom
I agree we should not bash the DA, it is by all accounts a great engine and I don't think you can fault their after sales service, which at the price of the engine should be expected and I would encourage all of us to be circumspect when comparing the 2, we don't want another thread locked!!
However, I have been shot down on several UK boards by die-hard DA supporters when I have mentioned how well my DL runs, I didn't mean to put down the DA but that is how it is interpreted! The bottom line is that the DL is a great engine at a great price and you can't fault people for being over enthusiastic about it.
By the way I get 7300rpm on a 3W 23x8 on a KS cannister, not a pipe, which is pretty good in my book.
Yarom
I agree we should not bash the DA, it is by all accounts a great engine and I don't think you can fault their after sales service, which at the price of the engine should be expected and I would encourage all of us to be circumspect when comparing the 2, we don't want another thread locked!!
However, I have been shot down on several UK boards by die-hard DA supporters when I have mentioned how well my DL runs, I didn't mean to put down the DA but that is how it is interpreted! The bottom line is that the DL is a great engine at a great price and you can't fault people for being over enthusiastic about it.
By the way I get 7300rpm on a 3W 23x8 on a KS cannister, not a pipe, which is pretty good in my book.
It is just ridiculous to see the brand debates rage when they are so pointless.
Your 3W rpm figures sound right based on the DL 50's I have. Canister systems can help things a lot, also.
The DL uses a different carb than other 50cc engines; maybe there are some differences to attribute to that.
#254
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Red Wing,
MN
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

This forum is for help and talking untill someone comes in and starts calling the dl a clone or a cheap copy. I've heared about the cast block a 100 times the motor runs and fly my plane perfect. So please leave the da talk for some were else.
#255

My Feedback: (198)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: El Reno, OK
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

paul5992 - regard JXF props.... I have had some, and they work well, but there are variations in firmness and rigidity from prop to prop. Try the "untwist" test. Grab a NX or 3W or Menz....try to untwist the blade and watch. Then do the same with the Xoar or JXF. In my experience the JXF untwists more easily than others. The very WORST out there for this un-twisting are the Master Airscrews, Zingers, and absolute BOTTOM of the bucket, the Top Flites.
Please know that I am not "bashing" products as I only share my personal experience and observations on these threads. If I do not "know" how something acts, I'll not comment.
In the case of props, I have done a lot of experimenting.... my DL's really are "happy" (so I'm happy) with the NX and Xoar 22 and 23 x 8's.
If you are concerned about hub compression, and still want to run a soft prop, simply drill four 1/8" holes through the hub like mounting holes. Get 1/8" hardwood dowel. You will have to tap the 1/8" dowel into the snug fit holes drilled, then simply put a drop of CA glue on front and back. The dowels will absolutely stop compression.
This is the same fix (only done with 3/32" dowels, or hardwood toothpicks) to firm up the cheap-ARF firewall engine mounting holes so they don't compress under standoff tightening. Works like a charm.
Please know that I am not "bashing" products as I only share my personal experience and observations on these threads. If I do not "know" how something acts, I'll not comment.
In the case of props, I have done a lot of experimenting.... my DL's really are "happy" (so I'm happy) with the NX and Xoar 22 and 23 x 8's.
If you are concerned about hub compression, and still want to run a soft prop, simply drill four 1/8" holes through the hub like mounting holes. Get 1/8" hardwood dowel. You will have to tap the 1/8" dowel into the snug fit holes drilled, then simply put a drop of CA glue on front and back. The dowels will absolutely stop compression.
This is the same fix (only done with 3/32" dowels, or hardwood toothpicks) to firm up the cheap-ARF firewall engine mounting holes so they don't compress under standoff tightening. Works like a charm.
#256
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: havana, IL
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Hey all. I'm purchasing the Gene Saucy extra 3oo from GP in Feb w/2.4 radio system. Is this engine to much for this plane?Read the Thor 45 thread and that motor sounds a little scary. I really want to go gas this next year but i'm a flyer who has to watch EVERY penny and so far this sounds to be the motor for entry but wanted to make sure it will fit the plane. later thanks guys

#257

My Feedback: (198)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: El Reno, OK
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

ORIGINAL: cubmaster126
Hey all. I'm purchasing the Gene Saucy extra 3oo from GP in Feb w/2.4 radio system. Is this engine to much for this plane?Read the Thor 45 thread and that motor sounds a little scary. I really want to go gas this next year but i'm a flyer who has to watch EVERY penny and so far this sounds to be the motor for entry but wanted to make sure it will fit the plane. later thanks guys
Hey all. I'm purchasing the Gene Saucy extra 3oo from GP in Feb w/2.4 radio system. Is this engine to much for this plane?Read the Thor 45 thread and that motor sounds a little scary. I really want to go gas this next year but i'm a flyer who has to watch EVERY penny and so far this sounds to be the motor for entry but wanted to make sure it will fit the plane. later thanks guys

Sorta like my Obsession with a DL 50.
#258
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: cary,
IL
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

aero bob,from what i am reading there is a couple versions of the dl 50.can you tell me what version you have .im just trying to find out if there is a carb diffrence between productions of this engine.thanx much
#259

My Feedback: (198)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: El Reno, OK
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Me, too. I've written Bob Kramer at DL USA about this. I have had three of these, now own two, and they work very well; no carburetor issues at all. The "newest" version, that I'm aware of, is the standoffs and thicker mounting lugs version, with some minor hub improvements. Performance is identical to earlier ones that I had.
The newest engine (one week old) has the WT - 664A carb on it.
The newest engine (one week old) has the WT - 664A carb on it.
#260

My Feedback: (14)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: St. Joseph,
MO
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

What's up with all these different carb numbers? I have installed 6 of these engines on customers planes and the latest carb number is WT 734 (arrived last week). I did not note the numbers on all the other carbs but all appeared to be the same carb for installation purposes. Early on I made a template for drilling the holes and all seemed to work fine.
BTW, everyone is very happy with the engines.
BTW, everyone is very happy with the engines.
#261
Senior Member
My Feedback: (10)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Friendswood,
TX
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Aerobob,
So glad to have you back in the thread. You mentioned drilling holes to put in hard dowels, are these in addition to the mounting holes? Great idea! I had a Xoar prop on a YS110 that got compressed so badly. Your trick will work there too.
So glad to have you back in the thread. You mentioned drilling holes to put in hard dowels, are these in addition to the mounting holes? Great idea! I had a Xoar prop on a YS110 that got compressed so badly. Your trick will work there too.
#262

My Feedback: (198)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: El Reno, OK
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

ORIGINAL: coronabob
Aerobob,
So glad to have you back in the thread. You mentioned drilling holes to put in hard dowels, are these in addition to the mounting holes? Great idea! I had a Xoar prop on a YS110 that got compressed so badly. Your trick will work there too.
Aerobob,
So glad to have you back in the thread. You mentioned drilling holes to put in hard dowels, are these in addition to the mounting holes? Great idea! I had a Xoar prop on a YS110 that got compressed so badly. Your trick will work there too.
#263

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kalona,
IA
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

I've done the same thing with small diameter carbon rod. I didn't do this on purpose as opposed to wood dowels or toothpicks, it was just all I had around at the time. Works like a charm!
Chad
Chad
#264
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tokoroa, , NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 3,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

But surely the prob hub will still compress until almost all the load is taken by the dowels or carbon -- effectively meaning that you're no longer spreading the load over a wide area but concentrating it on a small one.
I'd be concerned that this might then cause premature structural failure of the prop due to splitting, as the torque is now being transmitted through those dowels and not by the hub and washer themselves.
How hard can it be to simply re-torque the prop bolts at regular intervals anyway?
I'd be concerned that this might then cause premature structural failure of the prop due to splitting, as the torque is now being transmitted through those dowels and not by the hub and washer themselves.
How hard can it be to simply re-torque the prop bolts at regular intervals anyway?
#266
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rhuddlan, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

ORIGINAL: XJet
But surely the prob hub will still compress until almost all the load is taken by the dowels or carbon -- effectively meaning that you're no longer spreading the load over a wide area but concentrating it on a small one.
I'd be concerned that this might then cause premature structural failure of the prop due to splitting, as the torque is now being transmitted through those dowels and not by the hub and washer themselves.
How hard can it be to simply re-torque the prop bolts at regular intervals anyway?
But surely the prob hub will still compress until almost all the load is taken by the dowels or carbon -- effectively meaning that you're no longer spreading the load over a wide area but concentrating it on a small one.
I'd be concerned that this might then cause premature structural failure of the prop due to splitting, as the torque is now being transmitted through those dowels and not by the hub and washer themselves.
How hard can it be to simply re-torque the prop bolts at regular intervals anyway?
#267

My Feedback: (198)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: El Reno, OK
Posts: 6,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Coke, Xjet - have you DONE the modification I'm suggesting to any props and run them?
I have done this a few times, when pressed by needs to use less-than-optimal propellers, and although there may be some stress/load redistribution in the hub, the ones I did sure didn't fail, either.
Not picking a fight, just trying to offer help to someone who was trying to prevent worse problems through hub compression while in use. (As a former ZDZ owner, I can tell you that that phenomenon DOES occur, and can be REALLY BAD when it happens in flight).
I'd be interested in some sort of a means to test the compression load distribution across the whole hub face before and after such a mod?
BTW - with softer hubs, torquing the screws to an appropriately "correct" value doesn't cut it....they will loosen nearly immediately when run, then they must be re-tightened, and that is where the circle starts.
Personally, the NX, Xoar, and PT Models hubs seem to be quite hard. The JXF that I have vary from prop to prop quite a bit.
I have done this a few times, when pressed by needs to use less-than-optimal propellers, and although there may be some stress/load redistribution in the hub, the ones I did sure didn't fail, either.
Not picking a fight, just trying to offer help to someone who was trying to prevent worse problems through hub compression while in use. (As a former ZDZ owner, I can tell you that that phenomenon DOES occur, and can be REALLY BAD when it happens in flight).
I'd be interested in some sort of a means to test the compression load distribution across the whole hub face before and after such a mod?
BTW - with softer hubs, torquing the screws to an appropriately "correct" value doesn't cut it....they will loosen nearly immediately when run, then they must be re-tightened, and that is where the circle starts.
Personally, the NX, Xoar, and PT Models hubs seem to be quite hard. The JXF that I have vary from prop to prop quite a bit.
#268
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: , IN
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Wavy,
No matter the Mfg., 50cc is still 50cc. You have to fill that displacement with fuel to make the power....You cant cook bacon in a cold skillet, it takes fuel for the fire....
#269

My Feedback: (17)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

In Bob's manual for the DL-50 he says "A general rule of thumb is to richen from the maximum on the ground rpm by 200rpm". How many of you guys do this and can tell a performance difference between richening the high speed needle for the 200rpm drop vs setting the high speed needle for max rpm on the ground?
#270

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kalona,
IA
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

The idea is that the engine/prop combo will unload in the air... adjusting on the rich side of max rpm by 200-300 on the ground is a safety measure to ensure you will not be running too lean when unloading in the air. Personally, I don't consider my engine fine-tuned after adjusting on the ground. I adjust reactively to its performance in the air. too many variables differ between static on-ground tuning and what the engine is experiencing in flight.
Chad
Chad
#271
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Orchard WA
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Bob, You could always set up two dial test indicators on the front plate after tightening the bolts. One on the washer just outside of the dowel and one just outside of the bolt head. Set them both to zero and come back a couple of hours later and see how much they have moved in relation to each other. The one outside of the bolt should move more. I know I kept re-tightening the bolts on my TBM prop and after about the fourth time the hub cracked. The Vess don't seem to have that problem. Also keep in mind that these props are side loaded against the four bolts so over-tightening is not necessary. I just snug them up in a set sequence and then run back through the same sequence until they all remain snug. If your spinner back plate has particularly deep serations it will usually take a little longer to get a new prop set into them as they cut deeper.
#272
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rhuddlan, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

ORIGINAL: aerobob
Coke, Xjet - have you DONE the modification I'm suggesting to any props and run them?
I have done this a few times, when pressed by needs to use less-than-optimal propellers, and although there may be some stress/load redistribution in the hub, the ones I did sure didn't fail, either.
Not picking a fight, just trying to offer help to someone who was trying to prevent worse problems through hub compression while in use. (As a former ZDZ owner, I can tell you that that phenomenon DOES occur, and can be REALLY BAD when it happens in flight).
I'd be interested in some sort of a means to test the compression load distribution across the whole hub face before and after such a mod?
BTW - with softer hubs, torquing the screws to an appropriately "correct" value doesn't cut it....they will loosen nearly immediately when run, then they must be re-tightened, and that is where the circle starts.
Personally, the NX, Xoar, and PT Models hubs seem to be quite hard. The JXF that I have vary from prop to prop quite a bit.
Coke, Xjet - have you DONE the modification I'm suggesting to any props and run them?
I have done this a few times, when pressed by needs to use less-than-optimal propellers, and although there may be some stress/load redistribution in the hub, the ones I did sure didn't fail, either.
Not picking a fight, just trying to offer help to someone who was trying to prevent worse problems through hub compression while in use. (As a former ZDZ owner, I can tell you that that phenomenon DOES occur, and can be REALLY BAD when it happens in flight).
I'd be interested in some sort of a means to test the compression load distribution across the whole hub face before and after such a mod?
BTW - with softer hubs, torquing the screws to an appropriately "correct" value doesn't cut it....they will loosen nearly immediately when run, then they must be re-tightened, and that is where the circle starts.
Personally, the NX, Xoar, and PT Models hubs seem to be quite hard. The JXF that I have vary from prop to prop quite a bit.

#275

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kalona,
IA
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts

Here you go guys! Pat's comment is of particular interest here....
[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_6243817/anchors_6243817/mpage_1/key_/anchor/tm.htm#6243817]Prop Bolt Torque[/link]
Chad
[link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_6243817/anchors_6243817/mpage_1/key_/anchor/tm.htm#6243817]Prop Bolt Torque[/link]
Chad