Giant scale with 2 recievers
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD,
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Giant scale with 2 recievers
Hi guys,
I would like to get some info on using 2 recievers for 1/3 scale aircraft. Having
lost my 1/3 scale H9 Cap due to reciever xtal failure, I'm thinking of having a
back-up reciever in my next 1/3 scale plane. Any help would be much appriciated.
Thanks,
Stick2K
I would like to get some info on using 2 recievers for 1/3 scale aircraft. Having
lost my 1/3 scale H9 Cap due to reciever xtal failure, I'm thinking of having a
back-up reciever in my next 1/3 scale plane. Any help would be much appriciated.
Thanks,
Stick2K
#4
My Feedback: (41)
RE: Giant scale with 2 recievers
It was a pretty common setup when the models started getting bigger and needing more servo slots as well as two rx busses for more power. You still see that setup used on some IMAC birds for various reasons.
Essentially you just install two rx's with two separate batteries and switchs, then setup the model with one rx controlling the right side of the model and one controlling the left side. Which controls the rudder and which controls the throttle is the subject of some debate and actually a matter of personal preference. There are also some considerations that need to be given to rx placement and the antenna routing on the 72MHz radios and spacing. It is not uncommon for that rx setup to actually have a reduced effective range, but it's not usually enough to affect model use unless it was a very poor install.
Essentially you just install two rx's with two separate batteries and switchs, then setup the model with one rx controlling the right side of the model and one controlling the left side. Which controls the rudder and which controls the throttle is the subject of some debate and actually a matter of personal preference. There are also some considerations that need to be given to rx placement and the antenna routing on the 72MHz radios and spacing. It is not uncommon for that rx setup to actually have a reduced effective range, but it's not usually enough to affect model use unless it was a very poor install.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD,
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Giant scale with 2 recievers
I will be using the 2.4 gig recievers so antenna spacing should not be a problem,
concidering the short antennas of these systems. But I would like to know the
hook up for right and left side of plane as to which servos go to which channels
to keep plane balanced if one reciever fails.
Stick2K
concidering the short antennas of these systems. But I would like to know the
hook up for right and left side of plane as to which servos go to which channels
to keep plane balanced if one reciever fails.
Stick2K
#6
RE: Giant scale with 2 recievers
every thing on left to left rec same for right side run some thing like swb with two rudder servos one plugs left rec one right
the thro is your choise either rec
the thro is your choise either rec
#7
My Feedback: (6)
RE: Giant scale with 2 recievers
I will follow this "recipe" when I build my 47% Velox:
The right aileron an the left elevator will go to receiver no 1 Aileron and elevator channel respectively
The left aileron and the right elevator will go to receiver no 2 Aileron and elevator channel respectively
Most likely will use a matchbox or similar device because the plane required 3 aileron servos per wing half, and 2 elevator servos per elevator half.
The throttle channel will go to one receiver, and the throttle kill switch wll go to the opposite receiver.
The rudder will most likely be a multi-servo affair, and I will probably get a non-binding tray, so in the event of a servo failure, the complete system does not bind. That way, I can plug in some servos to one receiver and the rest to the other receiver.
By cross-controlling the flying surfaces, I try to diminish rolling tendencies of the aircraft, if one of the receivers happens to fail.
Now that takes care of th critical flight controls. Anything else (smoke, lighs, ect) gets connected to any available channels on the receivers.
Rafael
The right aileron an the left elevator will go to receiver no 1 Aileron and elevator channel respectively
The left aileron and the right elevator will go to receiver no 2 Aileron and elevator channel respectively
Most likely will use a matchbox or similar device because the plane required 3 aileron servos per wing half, and 2 elevator servos per elevator half.
The throttle channel will go to one receiver, and the throttle kill switch wll go to the opposite receiver.
The rudder will most likely be a multi-servo affair, and I will probably get a non-binding tray, so in the event of a servo failure, the complete system does not bind. That way, I can plug in some servos to one receiver and the rest to the other receiver.
By cross-controlling the flying surfaces, I try to diminish rolling tendencies of the aircraft, if one of the receivers happens to fail.
Now that takes care of th critical flight controls. Anything else (smoke, lighs, ect) gets connected to any available channels on the receivers.
Rafael
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD,
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Giant scale with 2 recievers
Rafael,
Some time ago I read about your recipe (crossed connected controls) but
couldn't remember the setup. Thanks for the reminder, I'll be using a
similar type of setup.
Thanks everyone for your input, it's been very helpful.
Stick2K
Some time ago I read about your recipe (crossed connected controls) but
couldn't remember the setup. Thanks for the reminder, I'll be using a
similar type of setup.
Thanks everyone for your input, it's been very helpful.
Stick2K