OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (212)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MOUNT OLIVE,
NC
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
A friend of mine has both of these engines and has never run either one. They are new in the box just like they came from tower hobbies.Before I buy one,my question is, what is the difference in the two? I had a OS40FSR years ago and it was the best glow engine that I ever owned.
Thanks
Thanks
#2
My Feedback: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Columbia,
SC
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
You can find the specs for the 61SF on this page:http://osengines.com/engines/engine-...continued.html
Unfortunately, the FSR specs aren't there. OS used to include a sheet showing specs for the entire engine line. See if it's in either of the boxes, you can use that to compare.
Unfortunately, the FSR specs aren't there. OS used to include a sheet showing specs for the entire engine line. See if it's in either of the boxes, you can use that to compare.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northern Occupied Mexico,
CA
Posts: 998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
Buy them both!
I think the FSR was more of a pattern engine and the SF was more for sport.
Of course there's differences in them but someones else will know more.
I think the FSR was more of a pattern engine and the SF was more for sport.
Of course there's differences in them but someones else will know more.
#4
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
I was told that the .40 FSR was a "fast" engine, I have one new in the box but all of the paperwork is pretty limited, just one sheet and quite a bit of that is in Japanese.
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (264)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Great Mills,
MD
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
They are similar in power but the FSR is smoother running IMO and maybe a little lighter weight. Buy them both. They were both available in ringed or ABN configuration.
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (264)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Great Mills,
MD
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
ORIGINAL: iron eagel
I was told that the .40 FSR was a ''fast'' engine, I have one new in the box but all of the paperwork is pretty limited, just one sheet and quite a bit of that is in Japanese.
I was told that the .40 FSR was a ''fast'' engine, I have one new in the box but all of the paperwork is pretty limited, just one sheet and quite a bit of that is in Japanese.
It may have been a fast engine by 1970's standards, but certainly not today. I have a NIB one also, along with a few used ones in my stash, and a "new" marine version fsr that is about 30-35 yrs old.
#7
Senior Member
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
The FSR has a bolt on muffler that usually breaks the crankcase in a crash while the SF uses a bolt through muffler that is more surviveable.
I think the FSR is tuned to the upper rpm range while the SF is slightly lower, at least my 40 sized ones are. Manufacturers have been lowering the tuning rpm range to run larger props at lower rpm to eliminate excessive noise.
In my opinion the FSR with its separate crankcase makes machining the ports easier and therefore breath better. Also makes it easier to change the bearings since you dont have to take out the liner.
I think the FSR is tuned to the upper rpm range while the SF is slightly lower, at least my 40 sized ones are. Manufacturers have been lowering the tuning rpm range to run larger props at lower rpm to eliminate excessive noise.
In my opinion the FSR with its separate crankcase makes machining the ports easier and therefore breath better. Also makes it easier to change the bearings since you dont have to take out the liner.
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
jeffie8696 is correct. The reason given by OS at the time for going with a one piece crankcase on the SF series is that it provided a more solid front end reducing vibration as compared to the bolt on front housing of the FSR series. I have the .60 FSR ringed, .61 FSR ABN, and three .61 SF ABN engines. They are all great but I like the SF series little better than the FSR series mainly because of the bolt through muffler. The muffler mounting for the SF series is compatible with the later FX and AX series of the same size. One other thing to note is that the carb on the FSR series has a three needle valve set up with one for mid range. The SF series carb has a conventional two needle valve set up.
Bruce
Bruce
#9
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
slap an 11x7 on the 61 FSR and it will be happy is a revver the 61 SF is a longer stroke motor , and produces more torque, they are happier swinging bigger loads maybe 11x10 patter or 12" props.... my dad had a 61 SF on a 8ft Telemaster and he put a 13x6 and it seemed happy swinging it
#12
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
Check which version the SF is. The early version had many bearing issues which resulted in a new case design that housed a larger rear bearing. After that, the SF proved to be an excellent engine that liked bigger props than the fsr. The fsr is a great engine as well. If you could afford it consider both.....
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (24)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Endicott,
NY
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
ORIGINAL: flyerdave
How do you tell which version it is?
How do you tell which version it is?
I ran a lot of these engines back in the mid-late 80's and I recall OS made the change fairly early on, maybe a year or so after the SF was introduced. The SF and rear exhaust RF versions were 'long strong' designs and especially in pattern (back then there were still designs using side - exhaust engines) they were often piped and running 11x10 - 12x10 props...mine loved the 12x10. Anyway, the load with the bigger props caused the front bearing life to be rather poor so OS made the change.
For sport flying I dont think I would give it a 2nd thought. Like many have said, buy both but if it were me and I could only buy one it would be the SF. I have one on a Hog Bipe and it easily turns a 13x6 APC.
#15
My Feedback: (67)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: lancaster,
CA
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
The SF came after the FSR series around 1985-86. The SF was stroked to turn a longer prop at lower rpms since the pattern world was moving to turnaround at that time. The SF delivers more torque at lower rpms, but the FSR is a great fast turning engine, very good quality.
#16
My Feedback: (29)
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
Everyones experience has mirrored my own on this comparison. The 61FSR works nice with a 11x7, the carb acts too big for less rpm. The SF61 is more versatile and can work with less rpm although the SF will still spin an 11x7 just as well. I put an old OS61 carb on a Supertigre 75 and found more power with the same handling qualities as the OS61s they came from. My NIB 61s now sit in a drawer without carbs.
#18
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
ORIGINAL: Roary m
That would be the 7D carb? Those were very popular and OS mad a long run of them.
That would be the 7D carb? Those were very popular and OS mad a long run of them.
#21
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
ORIGINAL: Roary m
I wanted one of those goldheads when they came out just to say I had one. I would have ran him into the ground by now. 7DX? Interesting.
I wanted one of those goldheads when they came out just to say I had one. I would have ran him into the ground by now. 7DX? Interesting.
sorry DV is correct....thanks Turbo
#22
My Feedback: (67)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: lancaster,
CA
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS61FSR or OS61SF ABC
OH, ok, you threw me. I used to play with those guys and thought it might be a heli design that they tossed over to the air version. The goldhead was a commemorative to the FSR's. I have the 7DV on the VF's I have. don't know the dif.