Welcome to Club SAITO !

I have a SaitoFG 84 and I talked to Ray English and he told me that on a TF FW 190 all 3 cylinders have to have an air excess behind.On the 2 side ones i have an opening through the exhaust opening how to do it on the top? Don't want to cut the cowl open.
Any suggestions?
Any suggestions?



You betcha! watch out Hobbs, this subject could co-op club Saito lol. I am following these threads with great interest. The three cylinders are the pinnacle to one and a paria to another. My only initial comments are sort of overly simplistic. Yesterday I spoke with Dr Vogelsang about last minute instructions for my Moki 257 ( I am about to first run. ) His highest prioritys for me were finger testing each cyl. (Spittle on fingertip) psssssst. Each exhaust tube and Forget Heat and smoke testing. (As Dave here has mentioned here) test any design ice and temp variation are present and considered insignificant by manufacturer. ( his statement to which I agree)
Known hesitation and flat spots can be present in radials also and be normal. Lots of moving parts and balanced weights working fast. These engines do not inherently spool as fast as say a hc single and that is an unrealistic outcome without perfect tuning and calming of " hot rod" mentality. These things may do that work but they are going to be frustrating if folks intend to do 3d style super fast response operation.
The doctors other priority was slowing the servo down to match the Moki s ability to efficiently optimize the the fuel that is being so quickly forced into the fire. (Really more important with correctly atomizing the gasoline fuel. ( Not as big a deal when literally pouring raw methanol into a tube and spitting it into another tube)
As I said, pretty simplistic thoughts, but they carry a lot of weight on these funky little scale radials. Imho.
Last thought. Why didn't Satio incorporate the brilliant design of the early R5. The motor incorporated a impeller style fan in the cavity now housing the intake " tubes" machined into the part.
The turbulent intake of fuel and supercharging effect seems to have made a big difference. (common on full size types)
Never seen or heard of this complaint with an R5. And mine runs flawlessly without obg. But my Fg450 R3 does too. It hesitates enough as it spools to make my 3D flying brother in law wince and my buddy with a china box on his wag his head. As all here know. I don't do chi- na bling on glow motors. Hmmm. Think he is on his third hunnerd dollar trinket failure. And can't fly half the time cause his ignition battery has failed it was not charged. His R3 would run fine without it to. To each his own.
I would toss em in the trash if it took that to make them run. Jusayin

My Feedback: (6)

With all my playing catch up on my vehicle and house projects I have yet had a chance to run up my 120R3 in the Corsair. I have my trailer pulled out of the barn, but has not yet made it to my driveway so I can charge all the planes and prep them for the field. Too many projects, too little time.

My Feedback: (6)

Thank you for the numbers! The first thing I want to do is measure the engine and determine what size it actually is. The prop shaft thread size should be a good indicator to start with. Capt I sent you a PM this morning.
Last edited by FlyerInOKC; 06-02-2021 at 09:03 AM.


My Feedback: (6)

Now that I bought it I am wondering what I'll do with it. Impulse buy! I already told Mike, aka Captaincrunch44, I would let him know if I decide to sell it, he tried to buy it too. If he passes I'll open it to you guys first. I will check the prop nut size first and report back what I find. The engine looks awful big in the pictures to be a .65 but what I don't know about Saitos could fill books heck probably a whole library.

Does your 200R3 have a modified intake manifold ?
Not many people seem to have a radial ,,
How does it run ,, are you happy with it ?
I am looking for pictures of a modified manifold,
If you have any could you please post..
////
Not many people seem to have a radial ,,
How does it run ,, are you happy with it ?
I am looking for pictures of a modified manifold,
If you have any could you please post..
////

Now that I bought it I am wondering what I'll do with it. Impulse buy! I already told Mike, aka Captaincrunch44, I would let him know if I decide to sell it, he tried to buy it too. If he passes I'll open it to you guys first. I will check the prop nut size first and report back what I find. The engine looks awful big in the pictures to be a .65 but what I don't know about Saitos could fill books heck probably a whole library.

Hey RoKitYou may find images on the other forums dedicated to the R3. There are history, allegations and solutions in detail on this love em or hate em Saito series.
Pretty fascinating stuff!
Probably wouldn't be out there if Carthuga hadn't bought a used one and had a problem.
Google search any key words.
Pretty fascinating stuff!
Probably wouldn't be out there if Carthuga hadn't bought a used one and had a problem.
Google search any key words.

Hey RoKitYou may find images on the other forums dedicated to the R3. There are history, allegations and solutions in detail on this love em or hate em Saito series.
Pretty fascinating stuff!
Probably wouldn't be out there if Carthuga hadn't bought a used one and had a problem.
Google search any key words.
Pretty fascinating stuff!
Probably wouldn't be out there if Carthuga hadn't bought a used one and had a problem.
Google search any key words.
I am stubborn and will not give up yet.

Yep
You betcha! watch out Hobbs, this subject could co-op club Saito lol. I am following these threads with great interest. The three cylinders are the pinnacle to one and a paria to another. My only initial comments are sort of overly simplistic. Yesterday I spoke with Dr Vogelsang about last minute instructions for my Moki 257 ( I am about to first run. ) His highest prioritys for me were finger testing each cyl. (Spittle on fingertip) psssssst. Each exhaust tube and Forget Heat and smoke testing. (As Dave here has mentioned here) test any design ice and temp variation are present and considered insignificant by manufacturer. ( his statement to which I agree)
Known hesitation and flat spots can be present in radials also and be normal. Lots of moving parts and balanced weights working fast. These engines do not inherently spool as fast as say a hc single and that is an unrealistic outcome without perfect tuning and calming of " hot rod" mentality. These things may do that work but they are going to be frustrating if folks intend to do 3d style super fast response operation.
The doctors other priority was slowing the servo down to match the Moki s ability to efficiently optimize the the fuel that is being so quickly forced into the fire. (Really more important with correctly atomizing the gasoline fuel. ( Not as big a deal when literally pouring raw methanol into a tube and spitting it into another tube)
As I said, pretty simplistic thoughts, but they carry a lot of weight on these funky little scale radials. Imho.
Last thought. Why didn't Satio incorporate the brilliant design of the early R5. The motor incorporated a impeller style fan in the cavity now housing the intake " tubes" machined into the part.
The turbulent intake of fuel and supercharging effect seems to have made a big difference. (common on full size types)
Never seen or heard of this complaint with an R5. And mine runs flawlessly without obg. But my Fg450 R3 does too. It hesitates enough as it spools to make my 3D flying brother in law wince and my buddy with a china box on his wag his head. As all here know. I don't do chi- na bling on glow motors. Hmmm. Think he is on his third hunnerd dollar trinket failure. And can't fly half the time cause his ignition battery has failed it was not charged. His R3 would run fine without it to. To each his own.
I would toss em in the trash if it took that to make them run. Jusayin
You betcha! watch out Hobbs, this subject could co-op club Saito lol. I am following these threads with great interest. The three cylinders are the pinnacle to one and a paria to another. My only initial comments are sort of overly simplistic. Yesterday I spoke with Dr Vogelsang about last minute instructions for my Moki 257 ( I am about to first run. ) His highest prioritys for me were finger testing each cyl. (Spittle on fingertip) psssssst. Each exhaust tube and Forget Heat and smoke testing. (As Dave here has mentioned here) test any design ice and temp variation are present and considered insignificant by manufacturer. ( his statement to which I agree)
Known hesitation and flat spots can be present in radials also and be normal. Lots of moving parts and balanced weights working fast. These engines do not inherently spool as fast as say a hc single and that is an unrealistic outcome without perfect tuning and calming of " hot rod" mentality. These things may do that work but they are going to be frustrating if folks intend to do 3d style super fast response operation.
The doctors other priority was slowing the servo down to match the Moki s ability to efficiently optimize the the fuel that is being so quickly forced into the fire. (Really more important with correctly atomizing the gasoline fuel. ( Not as big a deal when literally pouring raw methanol into a tube and spitting it into another tube)
As I said, pretty simplistic thoughts, but they carry a lot of weight on these funky little scale radials. Imho.
Last thought. Why didn't Satio incorporate the brilliant design of the early R5. The motor incorporated a impeller style fan in the cavity now housing the intake " tubes" machined into the part.
The turbulent intake of fuel and supercharging effect seems to have made a big difference. (common on full size types)
Never seen or heard of this complaint with an R5. And mine runs flawlessly without obg. But my Fg450 R3 does too. It hesitates enough as it spools to make my 3D flying brother in law wince and my buddy with a china box on his wag his head. As all here know. I don't do chi- na bling on glow motors. Hmmm. Think he is on his third hunnerd dollar trinket failure. And can't fly half the time cause his ignition battery has failed it was not charged. His R3 would run fine without it to. To each his own.
I would toss em in the trash if it took that to make them run. Jusayin
I think from a general perspective that our fuel systems are as simple as they possibly can be.
However there is grades of acceptable performance and if a "normal" application, letīs say an airplane of 4-5kg are using
20 meters of the runway waiting for the engine to clear out one of the cylinders, that would not be acceptable for me.
Or if you need instant power in a "go around" situation you would want to know that the engine is reliable enough to help you.
I know from what people have stated that there is plenty of engines that never had any mods and the owners are happy with them.
For me all the available information is somewhat confusing and I am trying to understand what the difference might be between a good and a bad engine ?
I refuse to pay two times for my engine just because Saito donīt take their responsibility toward its customers.
So consequently I am looking for a DIY manifold solution.
If I donīt manage,, the engine will end up in the "corner of shame" in my garage.
Senior Member

Yep
You betcha! watch out Hobbs, this subject could co-op club Saito lol. I am following these threads with great interest. The three cylinders are the pinnacle to one and a paria to another. My only initial comments are sort of overly simplistic. Yesterday I spoke with Dr Vogelsang about last minute instructions for my Moki 257 ( I am about to first run. ) His highest prioritys for me were finger testing each cyl. (Spittle on fingertip) psssssst. Each exhaust tube and Forget Heat and smoke testing. (As Dave here has mentioned here) test any design ice and temp variation are present and considered insignificant by manufacturer. ( his statement to which I agree)
Known hesitation and flat spots can be present in radials also and be normal. Lots of moving parts and balanced weights working fast. These engines do not inherently spool as fast as say a hc single and that is an unrealistic outcome without perfect tuning and calming of " hot rod" mentality. These things may do that work but they are going to be frustrating if folks intend to do 3d style super fast response operation.
The doctors other priority was slowing the servo down to match the Moki s ability to efficiently optimize the the fuel that is being so quickly forced into the fire. (Really more important with correctly atomizing the gasoline fuel. ( Not as big a deal when literally pouring raw methanol into a tube and spitting it into another tube)
As I said, pretty simplistic thoughts, but they carry a lot of weight on these funky little scale radials. Imho.
Last thought. Why didn't Satio incorporate the brilliant design of the early R5. The motor incorporated a impeller style fan in the cavity now housing the intake " tubes" machined into the part.
The turbulent intake of fuel and supercharging effect seems to have made a big difference. (common on full size types)
Never seen or heard of this complaint with an R5. And mine runs flawlessly without obg. But my Fg450 R3 does too. It hesitates enough as it spools to make my 3D flying brother in law wince and my buddy with a china box on his wag his head. As all here know. I don't do chi- na bling on glow motors. Hmmm. Think he is on his third hunnerd dollar trinket failure. And can't fly half the time cause his ignition battery has failed it was not charged. His R3 would run fine without it to. To each his own.
I would toss em in the trash if it took that to make them run. Jusayin
You betcha! watch out Hobbs, this subject could co-op club Saito lol. I am following these threads with great interest. The three cylinders are the pinnacle to one and a paria to another. My only initial comments are sort of overly simplistic. Yesterday I spoke with Dr Vogelsang about last minute instructions for my Moki 257 ( I am about to first run. ) His highest prioritys for me were finger testing each cyl. (Spittle on fingertip) psssssst. Each exhaust tube and Forget Heat and smoke testing. (As Dave here has mentioned here) test any design ice and temp variation are present and considered insignificant by manufacturer. ( his statement to which I agree)
Known hesitation and flat spots can be present in radials also and be normal. Lots of moving parts and balanced weights working fast. These engines do not inherently spool as fast as say a hc single and that is an unrealistic outcome without perfect tuning and calming of " hot rod" mentality. These things may do that work but they are going to be frustrating if folks intend to do 3d style super fast response operation.
The doctors other priority was slowing the servo down to match the Moki s ability to efficiently optimize the the fuel that is being so quickly forced into the fire. (Really more important with correctly atomizing the gasoline fuel. ( Not as big a deal when literally pouring raw methanol into a tube and spitting it into another tube)
As I said, pretty simplistic thoughts, but they carry a lot of weight on these funky little scale radials. Imho.
Last thought. Why didn't Satio incorporate the brilliant design of the early R5. The motor incorporated a impeller style fan in the cavity now housing the intake " tubes" machined into the part.
The turbulent intake of fuel and supercharging effect seems to have made a big difference. (common on full size types)
Never seen or heard of this complaint with an R5. And mine runs flawlessly without obg. But my Fg450 R3 does too. It hesitates enough as it spools to make my 3D flying brother in law wince and my buddy with a china box on his wag his head. As all here know. I don't do chi- na bling on glow motors. Hmmm. Think he is on his third hunnerd dollar trinket failure. And can't fly half the time cause his ignition battery has failed it was not charged. His R3 would run fine without it to. To each his own.
I would toss em in the trash if it took that to make them run. Jusayin
In my opinion these R-3 Saitos need three things, toss all temperature measuring devices over the fence, peak the high speed needle, then set the low speed needle to optimum and you won't have a problem of any kind. No glow assist or ignition system needed.

My 120 R-3 at 6,000 rpm.

In my opinion these R-3 Saitos need three things, toss all temperature measuring devices over the fence, peak the high speed needle, then set the low speed needle to optimum and you won't have a problem of any kind. No glow assist or ignition system needed.

My 120 R-3 at 6,000 rpm.

My 120 R-3 at 6,000 rpm.
BUT
I also like to use the mid range,, my transition and mid range is very very much less than fantastic.
Senior Member

The 120 R-3 pictured turned a Graupner 14 x 7 at 7,760 rpm and idled at 1,830 rpm with a very clean crisp midrange. The Keleo ring made zero tank pressure, it had no pressure tap when it arrived, I drilled and tapped it for a pressure tap, I attached a balloon and the balloon hung there mostly limp. The 170 might make some pressure.

In my opinion these R-3 Saitos need three things, toss all temperature measuring devices over the fence, peak the high speed needle, then set the low speed needle to optimum and you won't have a problem of any kind. No glow assist or ignition system needed.

My 120 R-3 at 6,000 rpm.

My 120 R-3 at 6,000 rpm.
Swapped the set to the HH plug they used to ship on the Evo radials. Ran fine but there was a slight hesitation as it entered " mid range" . It runs very well in midrange and that's pretty much where I fly it. It's overpowering my 24 pound airframe. But I like the just off idle sound as it goes by low and slow.
I think expectations play a large roll. It amazes me that with as much negativity about these types they still retain high value in the used market.
Bet the break room chatter is vibrant at the Saito plant on this subject.

The 120 R-3 pictured turned a Graupner 14 x 7 at 7,760 rpm and idled at 1,830 rpm with a very clean crisp midrange. The Keleo ring made zero tank pressure, it had no pressure tap when it arrived, I drilled and tapped it for a pressure tap, I attached a balloon and the balloon hung there mostly limp. The 170 might make some pressure.
Funny, thats what she said the other night. On my Corsair I put OBG so that I didn't need to set up a special harness and battery pack just for the one plane. It gives the plane a cleaner look too. It shares the landing gear battery.

My Feedback: (1)

oh yeah I found it, I found it, around town.
I found it, I called the AMA and they did not even know about it.
guys, go to page 18 of the June AMA Aviation mag, tell me if you find it.
I got a kick out of it, it's a crazy mistake. how could a manufacture make such a mistake, I even found it on Google Images (Google Images is your friend).
the AMA lady I talked to said they didn't know about this mistake and that she is going to Email the person that wrote the article and ask him about it. and she also told me that the last page (127) has a photo of the wrong Heli, she got a call yesterday about that photo.
let me know if you find it. I can see you all now looking for it LOL
Jim
PS, don't forget what John Wayne said, "I have more Saito's than guns".
I found it, I called the AMA and they did not even know about it.
guys, go to page 18 of the June AMA Aviation mag, tell me if you find it.
I got a kick out of it, it's a crazy mistake. how could a manufacture make such a mistake, I even found it on Google Images (Google Images is your friend).
the AMA lady I talked to said they didn't know about this mistake and that she is going to Email the person that wrote the article and ask him about it. and she also told me that the last page (127) has a photo of the wrong Heli, she got a call yesterday about that photo.
let me know if you find it. I can see you all now looking for it LOL
Jim
PS, don't forget what John Wayne said, "I have more Saito's than guns".