OS engines users Club
#276
My Feedback: (112)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Montgomery, NY NY
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS engines users Club
Hello,
I am new to the forum and would like to know if anyone could help me. I have an older OS 91-FS engine that has had the first few threads of the muffler (silencer) stripped. The header pipe threads are in perfect condition, all I need to do is to restart the threads to be able to use the muffler.
My question is - does anyone know what thread tap size I need to use to re-tap the threads?
Thank you in advance for any assitance in this matter.
Regards,
Cesar
I am new to the forum and would like to know if anyone could help me. I have an older OS 91-FS engine that has had the first few threads of the muffler (silencer) stripped. The header pipe threads are in perfect condition, all I need to do is to restart the threads to be able to use the muffler.
My question is - does anyone know what thread tap size I need to use to re-tap the threads?
Thank you in advance for any assitance in this matter.
Regards,
Cesar
#279
My Feedback: (112)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Montgomery, NY NY
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS engines users Club
W8ye,
Thank you very much for the reply. I tried scouring the OS website for about an hour but could not find any info the muffler thread size.
Thanks again.
Thank you very much for the reply. I tried scouring the OS website for about an hour but could not find any info the muffler thread size.
Thanks again.
#280
My Feedback: (1)
RE: OS engines users Club
As per RCU rules, I didn't want to start a new thread for my question, so I'll ask here. I tached my SF .61 with its Mac's #1062 long stroke quiet pipe yesterday. Using Powermaster 5% nitro and an APC 11x10 I got a steady 11,630. Does this look like a decent figure? This is the non-pumped, side exhaust model.
Thanks,
David
Thanks,
David
#285
RE: OS engines users Club
My guess with the advent of the 1.2 AX, engines like the 91 or the 108 are becomming obsolete?
In other words, why purchase those engines when the 1.2 AX is available AND a better choice?
Anyone agree or disagree with this?
CK
In other words, why purchase those engines when the 1.2 AX is available AND a better choice?
Anyone agree or disagree with this?
CK
#286
My Feedback: (16)
RE: OS engines users Club
I've been around a 120AX at the flying field since they came out. It is in a UCD 60 and seems like a 60 until you open it up to pull out of a vertical and you hear the zoom of the 17-4 prop. The owner also has a couple Saito 125s with the same prop. The saito has a definite edge for low tork. The OS may have a slight edge on top end if you could let it wind up on the plane.
#287
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cincinnati,
OH
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS engines users Club
ORIGINAL: Avaiojet
My guess with the advent of the 1.2 AX, engines like the 91 or the 108 are becomming obsolete?
In other words, why purchase those engines when the 1.2 AX is available AND a better choice?
Anyone agree or disagree with this?
CK
My guess with the advent of the 1.2 AX, engines like the 91 or the 108 are becomming obsolete?
In other words, why purchase those engines when the 1.2 AX is available AND a better choice?
Anyone agree or disagree with this?
CK
I don't like adding weight, if I can get around it.
#288
RE: OS engines users Club
W8ye
The Saito you speak of, are you referring to a two stroke?
My interest with the OS 1.2 AX would be for a bi-plane. Generally, they need weight in the nose.
I don't believe a couple of onces in any direction, with the weight of an engine, is critical. After all, they are placed in many different models.
I need as much information as I can get on the OS 1.2AX or the older OS 1.08. I have to decide soon.
Charles
The Saito you speak of, are you referring to a two stroke?
My interest with the OS 1.2 AX would be for a bi-plane. Generally, they need weight in the nose.
I don't believe a couple of onces in any direction, with the weight of an engine, is critical. After all, they are placed in many different models.
I need as much information as I can get on the OS 1.2AX or the older OS 1.08. I have to decide soon.
Charles
#290
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sidney,
NY
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: OS engines users Club
Great thread! I picked up 2 OS 60 SR models from an estate sale. Both run great, but one is missing the needle valve from a 7B carb and it's a real pain to switch needles back and forth. Anyone have an idea where I could pick one up? Tried Tower's parts, but no go. Thanks.
#292
My Feedback: (2)
RE: OS engines users Club
Saito makes a 2.20CI version http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products...rodID=SAIE220A .
Does anyone make a 4S larger than this???
Bob
Does anyone make a 4S larger than this???
Bob
#294
My Feedback: (2)
RE: OS engines users Club
Thise numbers seem a bit off. I'm curious about where you got the 61 oz from? I just checked and the HH website says that the 2.20 is 40.5 oz complete, and 37 oz without muffler. This compares a bit more favorably with the 1.80 which is 31 oz without muffler. Still, 6 oz is a fair amount of weight, though it will be going on a large model...
Bob
Bob
#296
RE: OS engines users Club
I believe I was in error with the 61 ozs. Sorry. But I did see this someplace on line, that's where I got it. Maybe I'll stumble onto it?
The Saito sight has the OS 2.20 at 1096 grams and the OS 1.80 at 880 grams.
I haven't done drugs in a while and sold my scale on ebay, so I have no idea what that is in ounces?
I know little about these engines, so help is appreciated. I will have the engine mounted inverted with a Pitts style muffler.
Saito link:
http://saito-engines.info/specifications.html
And this is my project:
At 80"
The Saito sight has the OS 2.20 at 1096 grams and the OS 1.80 at 880 grams.
I haven't done drugs in a while and sold my scale on ebay, so I have no idea what that is in ounces?
I know little about these engines, so help is appreciated. I will have the engine mounted inverted with a Pitts style muffler.
Saito link:
http://saito-engines.info/specifications.html
And this is my project:
At 80"
#297
My Feedback: (2)
RE: OS engines users Club
I love that airplane... It looks like an Ag-Cat on steroids!!
It looks like it has a relatively long nose moment. Lighter would be better. If Hobbsy is right (and I'm sure he is), the OS would be the way to go.... if it's not too big for the overall design...
That's my opinion, but I can be made to waffle....
Bob
It looks like it has a relatively long nose moment. Lighter would be better. If Hobbsy is right (and I'm sure he is), the OS would be the way to go.... if it's not too big for the overall design...
That's my opinion, but I can be made to waffle....
Bob
#300
My Feedback: (1)
RE: OS engines users Club
I just added another engine to my OS fleet. This was the last cross-flow scavenged .60 that OS made: the Max-H FGR Blackhead. It was soon followed by the Schneurle ported .61F SR. I've been buying NOS OS parts over the last year or so when I can find them, and this one now has a new sleeve and ring, and new bearings, too. It weighs 17.4ozs with the muffler and some of that is castor oil. For the sake of comparison, my K&B .61 with muffler and Perry carb weighs 18ozs. The AX .55 weighs 18.5ozs with muffler. I guess I'll have to put the same prop on all three, use the same fuel and see who wins.
David
David