![]() |
New Engine Technology?
1 Attachment(s)
Just wondering if anybody has tried or heard of anybody using this technology? Sounds like it'd be perfect for scale pylon racing!
Wow, April 1st. Only 23 more days till Easter. |
RE: New Engine Technology?
G'day
Yes, we use that technology here all the time but especially just after March as the weather cools. Sadly, it only works for one day each year. Mike in Oz |
RE: New Engine Technology?
Hmm, at those rpm levels you would have to use a very high quality oil to avoid premature wear. I remember a product advertised early one April several years ago called Parflo Oil (I think it was spelt like that). The manufacturers of this oil had managed to reduce the coefficient of friction to slightly less than zero. Any engine that used it would actually have negative wear.
You would use it straight for an old clapped out engine to improve the compression, or mixed at an appropriate % with standard aeromodeling oils (castor or synthetic) to maintain the pinch in an ABX type engine. Must see if I can find some to try out when these engines come out. Cheers Dave H |
RE: New Engine Technology?
G'day
Yes, we are constantly striving to achieve "The Best" performance these days. I remember a few years ago one April, an electronics magazine published an article on "The Ultimate Loudspeaker Connection System" for the true audiophile. The normal copper speaker wire was replaced with 1 inch plastic tubes filled with liquid Mercury. This system was guaranteed to give absolute accuracy and "musicality" if at a rather high initial setup cost. A number of the "golden eared" fraternity actually installed the system and proclaimed that the results from the system was noticeably superior to even the finest low Oxygen Copper wire and that it produced a particularly "fluid" rendition of the music. All agreed that the small downside of Mercury poisoning was a small price to pay for the improvement in the sonic experience. |
RE: New Engine Technology?
Thank god it only happens one a year....[>:]
|
RE: New Engine Technology?
ORIGINAL: gerryndennis Hmm, at those rpm levels you would have to use a very high quality oil to avoid premature wear. I remember a product advertised early one April several years ago called Parflo Oil (I think it was spelt like that). The manufacturers of this oil had managed to reduce the coefficient of friction to slightly less than zero. Any engine that used it would actually have negative wear. You would use it straight for an old clapped out engine to improve the compression, or mixed at an appropriate % with standard aeromodeling oils (castor or synthetic) to maintain the pinch in an ABX type engine. Must see if I can find some to try out when these engines come out. Cheers Dave H It would also have negative friction which would mean a shaft would accelerate once turned over. It would be perfect for a zero displacement engine. |
RE: New Engine Technology?
the bad part is, I don't remember what year it was, but I remember that article from when it first came out...
|
RE: New Engine Technology?
Hey fizz, you're a bigger man than I because there's no way I would admit that. LOL
|
RE: New Engine Technology?
Couple that engine with the Turbo Entabulator tranny [8D]
Regards, Richard |
RE: New Engine Technology?
That Turbo Entabulator tranny vid was so good and how he kept a straight face...I talk to my customers and apprentice like that some times..Get away with it most of the time...
|
RE: New Engine Technology?
ORIGINAL: fizzwater2 the bad part is, I don't remember what year it was, but I remember that article from when it first came out... Dave Olson |
RE: New Engine Technology?
1 Attachment(s)
Here are a couple not all of you will remember:
Richard |
RE: New Engine Technology?
I had a Orbit radio system many years ago. Unfortunately, mine was not a six meter version though.
:D |
RE: New Engine Technology?
Hey Spaceworm - greetings from the designer of the Orbit Six Meter Transmitter. I donated it to
the MA Museum years ago, no idea what they did with it. Surely someoen there flew it. Eloy Marez |
RE: New Engine Technology?
1 Attachment(s)
I still have a one meter Orbit with round chrome gimbals and 6 channels, but it is on 72MHz. [8D]
Regards, Richard |
RE: New Engine Technology?
ORIGINAL: 50+AirYears Just wondering if anybody has tried or heard of anybody using this technology? Sounds like it'd be perfect for scale pylon racing! Wow, April 1st. Only 23 more days till Easter. |
RE: New Engine Technology?
ORIGINAL: Sport_Pilot ORIGINAL: gerryndennis Hmm, at those rpm levels you would have to use a very high quality oil to avoid premature wear. I remember a product advertised early one April several years ago called Parflo Oil (I think it was spelt like that). The manufacturers of this oil had managed to reduce the coefficient of friction to slightly less than zero. Any engine that used it would actually have negative wear. You would use it straight for an old clapped out engine to improve the compression, or mixed at an appropriate % with standard aeromodeling oils (castor or synthetic) to maintain the pinch in an ABX type engine. Must see if I can find some to try out when these engines come out. Cheers Dave H It would also have negative friction which would mean a shaft would accelerate once turned over. It would be perfect for a zero displacement engine. Dave H |
RE: New Engine Technology?
I thought they came out with a supercharged version later. New and improved MKIII with quad crankshaft bearings to handle the heavier load.
|
RE: New Engine Technology?
I read an article some years back of a simular engine.. sort of. This was the Varible Displacement Engine from Professor McDonald. The PhD MCD VDE (for short) could, once mounted in a model, change the size or displacement, making it a bigger or smaller engine. PhD MCD had his demo version mounted in a telescoping wing and fuse platform (remember those? I think his was the Sterling version of the Incedible Hulk model, that everyone copied, well it was a nice trainer, as long as you didn't let it get away from you), it also used a bladder tank to adjust for the needed change in cc volume.
I'm sure its not that much news to you guys, I'm well aware that I'm not the only one who saw that article. Just wanted to update the professors work. PhD MCD is now working on a standard airplane (wings and fuse stay the same size both on the ground and while in flight) but this one is an electric. The motor isn't a brushless, instead its a modified version of an early 1980s design, The Compound Wong by Mr Wong. PhD MCD has vet to release the mods he has done on the Compound Wong, but he did claim in last years (to the day) news article that his plans are to circumnavigate his plane around the globe on one flight. To do this he has installed a charging unit in the plane that uses the old tried and trued technology of cold fusion. Test flights and adjustments are planned for this year and is tight because the voyage flight is scheduled in exactly one year. I cant wait to see this on Fox news next year. I think PhD MCD executed this very well, using the old technology instead of trying to re-invent the wheel. As they say, Keep it Simple Stupid!! DM |
RE: New Engine Technology?
Another club member actually offered me one of those GHQ engines once. I wanted $50 to take it, but he only had $34.67 on him.
|
RE: New Engine Technology?
The GHQ was famous for being the only hobby engine that was made continuously during WWII. While everyone else was shifted off to made wartime materials, they got to continue making engines that didn't work. amazingly enough more than 100,000 of these things were made. Jillions of brand new unused GHQ engines still exist out there someplace. No one could get them to start and they'd toss them in a box to forget about it.
They have a nice story about them here, from the pic of that one example, the main problem is the cylinder, piston and rod fit. Ref: <span id="search"><span class="f"><cite>www.antiquemodeler.org/sam_new/news_letters/assets/dt153.pdf</cite></span></span> |
RE: New Engine Technology?
IIRC, until maybe the mid 1950s, you could still buy a GHQ from AHC for as low as $3.95. Made interesting paper weights.
That club member I mentioned actually claimed he had his running. Could turn a 13" prop over 5000 rpm. All he had had to do was hone and chrome plate the cylinder, turn a new piston to replace the stamped original, install a bronze shaft bushing, and a couple other little mods. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:39 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.