RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   Glow Engines (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/glow-engines-114/)
-   -   MVVS .91 (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/glow-engines-114/2798941-mvvs-91-a.html)

DT56 03-23-2005 10:34 PM

MVVS .91
 
Any opinions on the MVVS .91 engine for 3D flying?

David_Moen 03-23-2005 11:39 PM

RE: MVVS .91
 
I have an MVVS .91 with BCM Pitts on a 66" Extra. The ability of this engine to swing a rather large prop (APC15x8) with ease makes me think it would absolutley rock with a lower pitch prop on a 3D airplane. I'm going to move the engine into something more 3D-able and am trying to figure out which airplane to get, the SIG 3D mayhem looks promising.

DT56 03-24-2005 12:11 AM

RE: MVVS .91
 
Thanks for the info! I think I'll try one on an OMP YAK 65.

Hobbsy 03-24-2005 07:18 AM

RE: MVVS .91
 
I tried a 14x12 APC on my MVVS .91 the other day and it did well turning it at just under 8,200, this is with Fox 5% nitro fuel with 20% castor, less than an hours time on it and using the MVVS Silent muffler.

David_Moen 03-26-2005 12:36 PM

RE: MVVS .91
 
I thoght of a profile too, but first choice would be something a little more scale-like.

DT56 03-28-2005 11:28 PM

RE: MVVS .91
 
Thanks for the info hobbsy!

Bodge 03-31-2005 04:12 PM

RE: MVVS .91
 
1 Attachment(s)
I have the MVVS 91, currently in a Seagull Harrier. It is fitted with a 16 x 4 wideblade and is revving towards 9000. The engine has had almost one gallon of 20% castor, 5% nitro, through it so it is still quite tight and the revs vary a little. Pe Reiver reckons these engines need "a season" to loosen up (whatever a season is...)

Anyway, this engine pulls like a tractor and spins that big prop up very fast, so is responsive for hovering. Another bonus for 3D is that it is light, especially if you get the Weston throttle pipe from Just Engines. With that setup you would be pushed to find a better power weight ratio with such a tractable engine. (<600g)

Do not use the box silencer that the engine comes with as it restricts the power significantly. Thes engines apparently perform very well on a full-length tuned pipe, although I have no experience with that setup. I do know, however, that a large volume silencer is preferable.

Just a point to note: This is the second of these engines I have had. The first leaked a lot of oil from the front bearing, which got inside some models. I have had many discussions about this with various authorities, including Dar and Pe with various diagnoses, but nothing conclusive. I think the engine had a loose fitting shaft. The new engine has a sealed front bearing fitted by me and leaks no oil. Whether it would otherwise I don't know, but it is an easy and cheap enough mod to make. If you look very carefully at the piccie, you can just make it out.

Regardless of the above, I thaink the MVVS91 is an excellent power unit, both for 3D and for pattern. (Goes well in a Swallow EX and pulls a 13 x huge pitch)). It is reliable, powerful and starts well; it does not seems to mind running upside down. This engine is not, however, a revver. It seems to like to pull a big prop. I am impressed with it. I think it out-fourstokes the fourstrokes...


Bodge 03-31-2005 04:17 PM

RE: MVVS .91
 
By the way: my previous MVVS 91 shook three MVVS quiet silencers to pieces and, yes, I always balance props. Those silencers are the standard type with an extension rivetted on. The rivets worked loose on all of them - a bit cheap and nasty, in my opinion.

DT56 04-03-2005 06:54 AM

RE: MVVS .91
 
Thanks Bodge for the great info!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.