RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   Kit Building (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/kit-building-121/)
-   -   4 stroke question (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/kit-building-121/1037515-4-stroke-question.html)

Mike Caspari 08-08-2003 09:14 PM

4 stroke question
 
I am currently building a 64" extra type plane. I want this plane to have sufficient power to be fully capable. It should weigh no more than 8.5lbs in the air, probably less but we'll see. I've been looking at a magnum 120 4 stroke but I wonder if a thunder tiger 91 4 stroke will do it. I know a magnum 91 4 stroke will hover a 8.25lb plane but it will not pull vertical out of the hover. I want for this plane to pull out of the hover and have responsive torque.
Any input will be appreciated. Do the larger 2 strokes have good torque?

EscapeFlyer 08-08-2003 11:13 PM

4 stroke question
 
As much as I like magnum engines, I would recommend a saito. The are much more powerful and much lighter in weight. I would recommend a saito 100 or 120. They are very reliable and economic once broken in properly.

This is just my opinion, but I hope it helps. :cool:

David Cutler 08-08-2003 11:17 PM

4 stroke question
 
If you do choose a Saito, go for the 100, not the 120, as it's a lot lighter and will suit an 8.5 lb plane perfectly.

-DC

MinnFlyer 08-09-2003 04:58 PM

4 stroke question
 
OR a YS 91FZ (or 110)

David Cutler 08-09-2003 05:02 PM

4 stroke question
 

Originally posted by MinnFlyer
OR a YS 91FZ (or 110)
Yes. I admit it doctor.

I am at risk, at the moment, of becoming a YS man instead of a Saito man, having run my YS110 a few times now.

-David C.

3d freak 08-09-2003 11:44 PM

4 stroke question
 
go for the saito 100 i have a 9 pound extra and it will rocket out of a hover
use a 15x6 APC prop

Mike Caspari 08-10-2003 04:14 PM

4 stroke question
 
Thanks for the inputs. sounds like the saito 100 will do it or the ys 91. Best I can tell is a good 3D plane needs torque to pull vertical and "reset" in the hover when you start to roll/fall out. I'm new at this 3D stuff. Are these large 4 strokes tempermental?
The TT pro46 and 36 I use now have got me spoiled I guess because they run perfect everytime. Thanks for the help.

Rodney 08-10-2003 04:56 PM

4 stroke question
 
I have found that most 4 strokes (all brands) are less tempermental than the 2 strokes. Once set up, I hardly ever have to touch the needle valves again, even when changing brands of fuel.

EscapeFlyer 08-10-2003 06:22 PM

four cycle engines
 
I agree. 4strokes have been much less tempermental for me also. Some I have even flown straight out of the box(magnum, saito) without problems. I wouldn't recommend that though.

I have found the bigger powerplants take a little more time to break in, but are still easier to use.

I've mounted them sideways, inverted, up straight with no problems. I even have an airplane were the fuel tank centerline is two inches above the carburator of my inverted saito 100, and no problems whatsoever! :boxing:

Mike Caspari 08-11-2003 01:43 AM

4 stroke question
 
My dads Magnum 91 runs good, I was very impressed with it but it will barely hover his 8.5lb plane I built for him. I'll look at the Saito 100. I probably will have to cover the plane and get a good feel of the all up weight before buying the engine. Right now framed up minus the gear it weighs 3.5 lbs. I'd like to be at 7.5lbs without fuel but that may be wishful thinking.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.