![]() |
Dumb thumb
Let's see, I have crashed my Kadet Sr. trying to hover it about a month ago and my Tiger 60 today being stupid. I have a Funtana that is still flight worthy and a pattern kit on the board. Neither of these planes are what I would consider relaxing to fly. What would the collective reccomend for a relaxing little plane to fly in the 60 range as I have a ST G75 and a Saito 100 on the shelf. I like building kits, so that is not an issue. Any input would be appreciated.
|
RE: Dumb thumb
Clipped Wing Cub!!!
|
RE: Dumb thumb
how about the 4 Star 60
|
RE: Dumb thumb
Big Stik/Ugly Stik or something similar.
|
RE: Dumb thumb
Go for Paul Swaney's Mojo 60 and put the Saito 100 in it. Then you'll hover and also feel relaxed.
|
RE: Dumb thumb
Sold. I'll get another Tiger to build, maybe the deluxe, and the Cub. My wife will be sooooooo mad. He he he he.
|
RE: Dumb thumb
One man's relaxing is another man's boring. I always thought I'd like to have a Cub. To me, they are the epitome of single engine civilian aircraft. Then a guy at our club brought his 108" WS out. It's looks really cool coming in for a landing, but that darn thing can't do anymore than fly circles. BORING!
My 4* 60 is relaxing. It can do quite a bit of aerobatic stuff, but if I crash it, it's no great lose. Just my 2 cents. Kerry |
RE: Dumb thumb
ORIGINAL: kerrydel One man's relaxing is another man's boring. I always thought I'd like to have a Cub. To me, they are the epitome of single engine civilian aircraft. Then a guy at our club brought his 108" WS out. It's looks really cool coming in for a landing, but that darn thing can't do anymore than fly circles. BORING! Kerry Flying in circles is for buzzards.[sm=lol.gif] For a ST 75 or a 1.00 engine consider the following: http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXHU91&P=0 http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXGZD8&P=0 http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXCSW5&P=0 http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXAP63&P=0 http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXCZR7&P=0 http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXJEG0&P=0 http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXCUS6&P=0 http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXH756&P=0 http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXHWS5&P=0 http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXFTC3&P=0 Thats a decent number of choices. From General Aviation Scale up to 3D. |
RE: Dumb thumb
ORIGINAL: kerrydel One man's relaxing is another man's boring. I always thought I'd like to have a Cub. To me, they are the epitome of single engine civilian aircraft. Then a guy at our club brought his 108" WS out. It's looks really cool coming in for a landing, but that darn thing can't do anymore than fly circles. BORING! Kerry ORIGINAL: Rcpilet Thats exactly why I've never wanted a Cub. I even find myself shaking my head when I see someone TRYING to fly one of those darn things. Flying in circles is for buzzards.[sm=lol.gif] I always thought a Cub was a boring plane till I saw a Clipped Wing Goldberg Anniversary Cub fly... I went right out and bought one! It's one of the best little aerobatic planes in the air! But you MUST clip the wing! |
RE: Dumb thumb
I really liked the Tiger, that is why I am going to replace it. My Funtana covers all the 3D, even though I cannot.
The Cub has a few benifits that I had not considered. 1) I have a set of plans for a 25% Katana I want to build, but my skills aren't there yet. 2) The Cub is an advanced build. It should bring my skills up to building from plans only. 3) I can fly it at Scale fun flys, where my funtana is not really scale. 4) I would hate to put floats on any of my true aerobatic planes, but the Cub is begging for them. Lopoks to me like a win-win deal. A guy where I work wants to put headers and a 4 barrell on his 72 Mustang, looks like I will have the money for it. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:06 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.