The bill for the MAAC lawyer fees for the 2006 Nats / CAC stuff
02-03-2006, 04:11 PM
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: The bill for the MAAC lawyer fees for the 2006 Nats / CAC stuff
ORIGINAL: Sharpy01
Anyone else getting the feeling (pardon the pun) that Ronnieo is typing this stuff without any clothing on? [&:]
Anyone else getting the feeling (pardon the pun) that Ronnieo is typing this stuff without any clothing on? [&:]
02-03-2006, 04:13 PM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: The bill for the MAAC lawyer fees for the 2006 Nats / CAC stuff
ORIGINAL: ronnieo1
Tomorrow I'll sober up and think of what a stupid idea.
Tomorrow I'll sober up and think of what a stupid idea.
???? --- Uh --- ????
02-03-2006, 06:25 PM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Headingley, MB, CANADA
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: The bill for the MAAC lawyer fees for the 2006 Nats / CAC stuff
ORIGINAL: Stateofmind
Thankyou for giving me Mr Smith's phone number. I had a very good conversation. He tells me that he has put a motion to the board to sit down with all parties and work things out. Apparently the board lead by a Mr Barlow voted down the motion. He said he has suggested a sit down with all parties 3 or 4 times. Sounds to me that the people involved don't want to get things settled. Makes you wonder.
mister smith did not say anything about the people involved but did enlighten me as to the events. It does sound like there is soure grapes based on what he said and what I read on this site.
If the people running MAAC aren't willing to sit down and talk, why are they spending membership money needlessly. Makes you wonder.
He did say that Propworn was nominated to run a 2006 national event but declined. Makes you wonder.
Thankyou for giving me Mr Smith's phone number. I had a very good conversation. He tells me that he has put a motion to the board to sit down with all parties and work things out. Apparently the board lead by a Mr Barlow voted down the motion. He said he has suggested a sit down with all parties 3 or 4 times. Sounds to me that the people involved don't want to get things settled. Makes you wonder.
mister smith did not say anything about the people involved but did enlighten me as to the events. It does sound like there is soure grapes based on what he said and what I read on this site.
If the people running MAAC aren't willing to sit down and talk, why are they spending membership money needlessly. Makes you wonder.
He did say that Propworn was nominated to run a 2006 national event but declined. Makes you wonder.
JH
02-03-2006, 06:47 PM
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Strathroy,
ON, CANADA
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: The bill for the MAAC lawyer fees for the 2006 Nats / CAC stuff
ORIGINAL: britbrat
???? --- Uh --- ????
ORIGINAL: ronnieo1
Tomorrow I'll sober up and think of what a stupid idea.
Tomorrow I'll sober up and think of what a stupid idea.
???? --- Uh --- ????
02-04-2006, 12:29 AM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Headingley, MB, CANADA
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: The bill for the MAAC lawyer fees for the 2006 Nats / CAC stuff
ORIGINAL: jhelps
As you have had the benefit of discussion with Mr Smith, (and apparently not with your own ZD) perhaps you could enlighten us as to exactly what he thinks needs to be negotiated? Since he has apparently not answered questions from his own zone members we now turn to you for the information. My understanding is that there is an outstanding report from the last nationals due and a question of funds that apparently belong to MAAC. Not certain what we would have the board negotiate on those points but again perhaps you have some new info?
JH
ORIGINAL: Stateofmind
Thankyou for giving me Mr Smith's phone number. I had a very good conversation. He tells me that he has put a motion to the board to sit down with all parties and work things out. Apparently the board lead by a Mr Barlow voted down the motion. He said he has suggested a sit down with all parties 3 or 4 times. Sounds to me that the people involved don't want to get things settled. Makes you wonder.
mister smith did not say anything about the people involved but did enlighten me as to the events. It does sound like there is soure grapes based on what he said and what I read on this site.
If the people running MAAC aren't willing to sit down and talk, why are they spending membership money needlessly. Makes you wonder.
He did say that Propworn was nominated to run a 2006 national event but declined. Makes you wonder.
Thankyou for giving me Mr Smith's phone number. I had a very good conversation. He tells me that he has put a motion to the board to sit down with all parties and work things out. Apparently the board lead by a Mr Barlow voted down the motion. He said he has suggested a sit down with all parties 3 or 4 times. Sounds to me that the people involved don't want to get things settled. Makes you wonder.
mister smith did not say anything about the people involved but did enlighten me as to the events. It does sound like there is soure grapes based on what he said and what I read on this site.
If the people running MAAC aren't willing to sit down and talk, why are they spending membership money needlessly. Makes you wonder.
He did say that Propworn was nominated to run a 2006 national event but declined. Makes you wonder.
JH
JH
