RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   MVVS Support (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/mvvs-support-322/)
-   -   MVVS 35 IFS (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/mvvs-support-322/2564924-mvvs-35-ifs.html)

SJN 01-20-2005 08:41 PM

MVVS 35 IFS
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hi Guys

Which muffler will keep this gas engine at 85DB sound level, or below ?


Any recomendations DarZeelon?


Which one is most quiet of these two ?

DarZeelon 01-20-2005 11:44 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Sonnich,


I don't think any silencer your plane can carry will be able to do that.

Those extreme sound criteria are even exceeded by electric motors (prop noise).


Maybe someone else has actualy seen a silencer that can?

SJN 01-21-2005 05:51 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
well.. ill start with one of the stock silencers, and see how it performs....... But which one of the two above are best/least noisy ?
We dont messure the sound level at our club......but it says 85db in the rule book.

Just as long as the engine is "pleasant" to listen too, poeple dont mind. :)

DarZeelon 01-21-2005 07:13 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Sonnich,


I guess it is a flip of a coin.

Dave Hobbs wrote the 'dustbin' #3298/35 muffler makes a mellow sound and is not too noisy (the .61-.91 version #3298/10).
It obviously costs less, but the Pitts style #3271 has more volume and more exit area. It should make better performance.

SJN 01-21-2005 07:29 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Thanks Dar.

Ill buy the pitts, and try a 22/8 for lowest Rpm.

Do you know if the pitts style wil mount inverted?
it looks symetrical...

SJN 01-28-2005 05:25 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
1 Attachment(s)
Just recieved it....

Nice engine!

SJN 01-28-2005 05:27 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
1 Attachment(s)
..

SJN 01-28-2005 05:31 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
1 Attachment(s)
...

SJN 01-28-2005 05:32 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
1 Attachment(s)
1935g or 4.26lbs with silencer, ignition, and batt.

SJN 01-28-2005 06:59 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
1 Attachment(s)
its going to replace my saito 150...

SJN 01-28-2005 09:54 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
It says to run in the engine in 30 minutes using a 4% oil mix......

At what power setting should this be done ?

DarZeelon 01-28-2005 12:48 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Sonnich,


Start at part throttle and gradually advance to full, on the test stand.

The engine will not be fully broken in, before it has consumed about 10-12 litres of fuel.

You will be able to fly it reliably, after about 30-40 minutes.

Don't reduce the oil before 4 litres are used.

SJN 01-28-2005 01:30 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Thanks Dar [8D]

SJN 02-21-2005 11:58 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
1 Attachment(s)
Fianly I took the engine/plane with me to work.... Cant fly it due to snow outside [&:]

I could not find the reccomeded 2 stroke oil, so I bougt some Shell ADVANCE Ultra.

Is is ok to use this oil for breaking in ?
It is full synthetic, so I guess break in will take longer time ?


2mb movie with it running, and the stock MVVS Pitts style muffler.
I like the sound of it. Not too loud. Also it sounds louder with the ecco in the hanger :)

http://bornholm.adsl.dk/modelfly/files/yak/Yak-MVVS.wmv



But I had a hard time priming the engine.
it would not draw fuel into the carb by turning the prop.
I primed it by by pumping fuel into the vent line of my tank, forceing it into the carb.
Also tipped the plane over and primed it directly into the venturi.

Its started fine after a few flips on the prop.
It also runs great at the moment with the 22/8 prop.
ofcourse the needles have to be set when the engine has been broken in.


DarZeelon 02-21-2005 12:40 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Sonnich,


The Walbro carburettors sometimes get the diaphragm stuck, so it becomes an effort to start the fuel flow.

Most high quality two-stroke oils should do the job.

You are right with your assumption about the break-in.

I believe the 22x8 prop is a bit large. The largest recommended size is 20x10, which is about equal to 21x8.
22x8 is good for a 40-45 cc engine.

SJN 02-21-2005 01:13 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
argg man....you think the prop is too big.

I read this review, and wanted the quietest setup.
http://morrishobbies.com/reviews/MVVS_215_3.jpg

he uses a 22x8 prop

mine is a mejslik prop...

Do you think the 22x8 prop will overheat my engine?

DarZeelon 02-21-2005 01:33 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Sonnich,


I cannot be sure, but this is what I fear.

From the clip, the RPM sounds pretty good for a bigger engine, but in extended full throttle, at low speed, you could see the engine getting hotter.

Read the review. The guy wrote this himself.

SJN 02-22-2005 10:48 AM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Thank you Dar.

I have ordered the 2 wooden props for my engine 20/10 and 21/8 to tyr out too...


If the engine liks the smaller props, Can I cut down my nice and expensive 22/8 carbon prop to a smaller diameter and re-balance it ofcourse ?

DarZeelon 02-22-2005 02:06 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Sonnich,


It is not that this engine likes smaller props.

This size (22x8) is simply too large for the engine to spin at optimum RPM.
This size is good for a 45 cc engine.

Unlike small glow engines, that are rated at 17,000 RPM by their manufacturer, but actually spun at 12,000-13,000 max, for most of the time, large and ignition engines are best propped close to their rated RPM.

This is because they can spin a big, efficient prop at these RPM levels.

Your 35 cc engine is rated at 9,000 RPM and the 22x8 prop is spun close to 6,000.

There is no way this could be good.


I would not suggest that you cut down your carbon prop, unless you know exactly what you are doing.

SJN 02-22-2005 02:20 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
hehe...no, I do not know exactly what Im doing [8D]

I have just read alot about gas engine....but there are not many poeple running them at 9000rpm.

6000rpm on a 22/8 is quite good isn`t it ?


But don worry....I have ordered new props :-)


What can happen by cutting off an even amunt on my carbon prop, and sanding it smoothe again ?
Shouldn`t be any weaker ?

DarZeelon 02-22-2005 03:04 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Sonnich,


Most carbon-fiber props are made with hand laid fiber cloth and uni-directional fibers.

The fibers at the tip are sometimes arranged to give the tip its best strength.

Contact the manufacturer of your prop, to verify the structural integrity of the prop will not be compromised, by cutting down the tips.

The prop's efficiency will be effected for sure, unless you sand the tips to resemble their original contour.

The wood props that you ordered will spin at a more effective RPM level.

A 22x8 at 6,000 is equivalent to 2.51 HP.
A 20x8 at 8,000 RPM; 4.07 HP.

I guess you can understand the difference.

DarZeelon 02-22-2005 03:14 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Sonnich,

Maybe the props that you did order are also a bit on the big side...
From my example it comes out this way.

SJN 02-22-2005 03:36 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Thanks for your time and help Dar.

When the snow melts here, I will try some real world trials with different props to suite my plane. :D

Im not too keen on having the prop go faster because of noise restrictions. But I dont want to overheat the engine either.
My 1,8meter plane weighs 6,5kg`s so I can sacrifice some power for less noise [8D]


SJN 02-25-2005 03:50 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
1 Attachment(s)
Dar, is the piston liner supposed to be dead center both up/down and side to side directions ?


DarZeelon 02-25-2005 04:17 PM

RE: MVVS 35 IFS
 
Sonnich,


I don't exactly understand what you are trying to ask, with that photo.
It is possible for the cores to shift slightly in a cast part (the cylinder casing is cast and then machined).

The head seems to sit squarely on the top of the sleeve.

Can you please elaborated your inquiry?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.