Community
Search
Notices
Q-500 Racing Discuss AMA 428, AMA 424, and any other variants of Quickie 500 racing

2.4GHz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2007, 01:16 AM
  #1  
Conrod
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Palmerston North, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 290
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 2.4GHz

Hi
Any body using 2.4 GHz radios for Quickie.

Geoff
Old 04-16-2007, 01:30 AM
  #2  
[email protected]
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2.4GHz

Yes Geoff, I am, trevor H[:-]
Old 04-16-2007, 02:04 AM
  #3  
jeffk464
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lehi, UT
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 2.4GHz

I have the 6ex in my predator II, and it works great.
Old 04-16-2007, 03:58 AM
  #4  
Conrod
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Palmerston North, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 290
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 2.4GHz

Hi Trevor
If you are using 2.4 is it the DX7 Spextrum, and if so how do you get on mounting the double receiver/aerial, as I was under the impression the second receiver/aerial had to be mounted at 90degs and 6'' away. This makes Futaba's single receiver a better opption.

Geoff
Old 04-16-2007, 07:56 AM
  #5  
ALbert.S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Roseville, MN
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: 2.4GHz

I am using the DX7 in my Q500 works great The instructions say 2 inches for the seperation Some flyers at the field Have them in Q40 also NO PROBLEMS!!!!!!!
Old 04-16-2007, 02:26 PM
  #6  
[email protected]
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2.4GHz

Yes Geoff, the receivers are mounted at right angles- aerials similarly and seperated by the interconnecting wire, about as you say
150 mm- this is what I did-I cyanoed the smaller receiver to the balsa fuselage in the correct direction, and then bubblewrapped the main receiver. This way at least the smaller receiver is always at 90 degrees- if the glue fails( I doubt it very much) I maybe in strife. I would take a digital photo but I have left my digital camera somewhere between here and a building site...................
to recap the smaller receiver runs the aerials vertical( up the fuselage side), the larger receiver bubble wrapped horizontally. ( lying flat) The only operating difference I noted was I did miss ( for a short time)the length of aerial that I was familiar with emerging out of the top of my previous transmitter. The spektrum aerial is only 150mm......but does fold. Why did I change from my JRPCM10- -it was time to upgrade-my pcm 10 is 8 years old ; the spektrum was available at that time, admittedly I do sell spektrum as a retailer- in fact I have sold 5 since March. Maybe the futaba has better credentials.....................that I do not know. big t [:-]
Old 04-16-2007, 03:08 PM
  #7  
Peter Harvey
Junior Member
 
Peter Harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: HaworthWest Yorkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2.4GHz

I have the futaba 6EX, works great, receiver real easy to fit, I would just like to be able to assign the fail safe to channels other than throttle, so that I can have engine cutoff on a switch.
Old 04-16-2007, 08:38 PM
  #8  
rmenke
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Merced, Ca., CA
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2.4GHz

Guys: For whatever its worth, I have one of the new small "Burg" 6 channel receivers in a Q-500 type airframe, jett 60LX powered. It has been working flawlessly for a month or so. Only thing I don't like about the receiver is the very small antenna line it comes with, very small and kinks easially.
Old 04-16-2007, 09:27 PM
  #9  
[email protected]
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: 2.4GHz

yes, smeone had told me about one of those , the only complaint, tongue in cheek, I guess was its small size, trevor h[:@]nz

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.