2.4GHz
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
RE: 2.4GHz
Hi Trevor
If you are using 2.4 is it the DX7 Spextrum, and if so how do you get on mounting the double receiver/aerial, as I was under the impression the second receiver/aerial had to be mounted at 90degs and 6'' away. This makes Futaba's single receiver a better opption.
Geoff
If you are using 2.4 is it the DX7 Spextrum, and if so how do you get on mounting the double receiver/aerial, as I was under the impression the second receiver/aerial had to be mounted at 90degs and 6'' away. This makes Futaba's single receiver a better opption.
Geoff
#5
Senior Member
RE: 2.4GHz
I am using the DX7 in my Q500 works great The instructions say 2 inches for the seperation Some flyers at the field Have them in Q40 also NO PROBLEMS!!!!!!!
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4GHz
Yes Geoff, the receivers are mounted at right angles- aerials similarly and seperated by the interconnecting wire, about as you say
150 mm- this is what I did-I cyanoed the smaller receiver to the balsa fuselage in the correct direction, and then bubblewrapped the main receiver. This way at least the smaller receiver is always at 90 degrees- if the glue fails( I doubt it very much) I maybe in strife. I would take a digital photo but I have left my digital camera somewhere between here and a building site...................
to recap the smaller receiver runs the aerials vertical( up the fuselage side), the larger receiver bubble wrapped horizontally. ( lying flat) The only operating difference I noted was I did miss ( for a short time)the length of aerial that I was familiar with emerging out of the top of my previous transmitter. The spektrum aerial is only 150mm......but does fold. Why did I change from my JRPCM10- -it was time to upgrade-my pcm 10 is 8 years old ; the spektrum was available at that time, admittedly I do sell spektrum as a retailer- in fact I have sold 5 since March. Maybe the futaba has better credentials.....................that I do not know. big t [:-]
150 mm- this is what I did-I cyanoed the smaller receiver to the balsa fuselage in the correct direction, and then bubblewrapped the main receiver. This way at least the smaller receiver is always at 90 degrees- if the glue fails( I doubt it very much) I maybe in strife. I would take a digital photo but I have left my digital camera somewhere between here and a building site...................
to recap the smaller receiver runs the aerials vertical( up the fuselage side), the larger receiver bubble wrapped horizontally. ( lying flat) The only operating difference I noted was I did miss ( for a short time)the length of aerial that I was familiar with emerging out of the top of my previous transmitter. The spektrum aerial is only 150mm......but does fold. Why did I change from my JRPCM10- -it was time to upgrade-my pcm 10 is 8 years old ; the spektrum was available at that time, admittedly I do sell spektrum as a retailer- in fact I have sold 5 since March. Maybe the futaba has better credentials.....................that I do not know. big t [:-]
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: HaworthWest Yorkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4GHz
I have the futaba 6EX, works great, receiver real easy to fit, I would just like to be able to assign the fail safe to channels other than throttle, so that I can have engine cutoff on a switch.
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Merced, Ca.,
CA
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4GHz
Guys: For whatever its worth, I have one of the new small "Burg" 6 channel receivers in a Q-500 type airframe, jett 60LX powered. It has been working flawlessly for a month or so. Only thing I don't like about the receiver is the very small antenna line it comes with, very small and kinks easially.