Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Questions and Answers
Reload this Page >

New Battery questions by implication

Community
Search
Notices
Questions and Answers If you have general RC questions or answers discuss it here.

New Battery questions by implication

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2004, 03:32 PM
  #1  
Jim Branaum
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 2,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default New Battery questions by implication

For the last several years I, and many others, have used the trickle charge system described by Red Scholefield with great success and little effort. Batteries seemed to last a very long time and maintained a good capacity.

However, recently several incidents in the local area have raised a question about the newer Nicad high capacity batteries. It seems that several of us have had a pack suddenly develop an open cell. In most cases I have asked, they were the newer cells, but apparently of varying capacity. The latest one of mine that failed was a 1400 mHr 4 cell pack that was less than 2 years old. It failed while I was starting my plane up at the field one day.

The implied question is there, but not clear. Are the new technologies being used in manufacture allowing (or encouraging) sudden failure?
Old 06-30-2004, 03:43 PM
  #2  
Rodney
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: New Battery questions by implication

Did you do a failure analysis? If you stripped the heat shrink off, were there any jumpers between the cells open or was the open internal to a particular cell? Had the pack ever been subjected to a very humid environment, i.e. dunked in a lake or ????.
Had the pack ever been subjected to very high current draw? A close inspection of the dissassembled pack might give you a clue.
Old 06-30-2004, 04:14 PM
  #3  
Jim Branaum
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 2,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: New Battery questions by implication

On both of my failures, the packs had never been wet or been subject to high drain rates other than quarterly cycling at 500 mHr. On both there was a cell that was open internally.
Old 06-30-2004, 04:50 PM
  #4  
J_R
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Corona, CA,
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: New Battery questions by implication

Hi Jim

I have found Red to be a very friendly guy. He always answers e-mail promptly. If you have never contacted him directly, I would suggest giving it a try.

He is extremely knowledgable about batteries, and always helpful to modelers in need. I bet he has the information you seek.

He is a moderator in the battery clinic here on RCU or can be contacted through the battery clinic at http://www.rcbatteryclinic.com/

If you should contact him, let us know the results

JR
Old 06-30-2004, 06:38 PM
  #5  
Jim Branaum
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 2,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: New Battery questions by implication

LOL! Yeah, but I COULDN'T find the clinic here!

DUH. . .

Some days I should go fishing (which *I* HATE)!
Old 06-30-2004, 07:37 PM
  #6  
Red Scholefield
Banned
My Feedback: (9)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newberry, FL
Posts: 5,925
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: New Battery questions by implication

ORIGINAL: Jim Branaum

For the last several years I, and many others, have used the trickle charge system described by Red Scholefield with great success and little effort. Batteries seemed to last a very long time and maintained a good capacity.

However, recently several incidents in the local area have raised a question about the newer Nicad high capacity batteries. It seems that several of us have had a pack suddenly develop an open cell. In most cases I have asked, they were the newer cells, but apparently of varying capacity. The latest one of mine that failed was a 1400 mHr 4 cell pack that was less than 2 years old. It failed while I was starting my plane up at the field one day.

The implied question is there, but not clear. Are the new technologies being used in manufacture allowing (or encouraging) sudden failure?

Higher capacity Ni-Cds or Ni-MH have a higher propensity for internal shorts
and overall shorter service life. It is a simple manner of trying to cram 6
lbs of stuff in a 5 lb bag. Heavy marketing pressures to get more capacity
in the same volume required a number of design compromises, thinner
separator, tighter wound rolls, small mandrel on the winder . . . . all of
which lead to a higher inherent short rate. Now if the cells in your case
were actually open circuit, i.e. no connection internally, infinite
resistance if measured with an ohmmeter. There is nothing in the higher
capacity designs that would contribute to this . . . . so it would be a
manufacturing flaw (very rare in Sanyo cells). Cells from China on the other
hand have some quality problems off and on.
Old 06-30-2004, 11:06 PM
  #7  
Jim Branaum
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 2,635
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: New Battery questions by implication

Thank you Red. BTW, you are right again and I blew it again. It IS an internal short - DUH.

However, you have confirmed a thesis of mine about the subject.

Again, thank you very much. This will be shared all around here.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.