4 - stroke exhaust question
#3
Senior Member
RE: 4 - stroke exhaust question
Many of the older 4 strokes had exhaust pipes without a muffler. Depending on your application, you might be able to find an exhaust pipe that would fit your unit. The downside of this is, that without a muffler you may have a problem with tank pressurization and engine reliability. The newer 4 strokes put out more power than the older ones and are designed to run with a muffler and tank pressure, unless you are running a pump..
Good luck with your model.
Good luck with your model.
#4
My Feedback: (1)
RE: 4 - stroke exhaust question
ORIGINAL: mikeboyd
Many of the older 4 strokes had exhaust pipes without a muffler. Depending on your application, you might be able to find an exhaust pipe that would fit your unit. The downside of this is, that without a muffler you may have a problem with tank pressurization and engine reliability. The newer 4 strokes put out more power than the older ones and are designed to run with a muffler and tank pressure, unless you are running a pump..
Good luck with your model.
Many of the older 4 strokes had exhaust pipes without a muffler. Depending on your application, you might be able to find an exhaust pipe that would fit your unit. The downside of this is, that without a muffler you may have a problem with tank pressurization and engine reliability. The newer 4 strokes put out more power than the older ones and are designed to run with a muffler and tank pressure, unless you are running a pump..
Good luck with your model.
I just noticed what you said about OS and Magnum. Don't know about Magnum, but OS also has a flex pipe.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Andersonville, TN
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 4 - stroke exhaust question
I have posted this exhaust mod on another forum-but on my Saito 91-to keep exhaust in the cowl and exit out the bottom-I cut the extention pipe from engine to muffler in half-brased on a copper 90 then a 1/2" brass tube that extends thru bottom of cowl. I added a piece of brass tube inside the 1/2" tube for some back pressure-put pressure nipple about halfway up on the exhaust tube. Engine runs good-no muffler-surprisingly noise is no louder than with a muffler-nice throaty sound.
You may need to add a Z bracket to support the exhaust tube and prevent vibration. I also added a short piece of flat brass across bottom of copper 90 for extra support. On muffler pressure I got a "slow stream of bubbles" by dropping pressure line in a cup of water.
Not sure how Magnum or OS attaches their mufflers, but it must be something similiar to Saito. Give it a try-you will love the sound. Really makes a WWI plane sound realistic.
You may need to add a Z bracket to support the exhaust tube and prevent vibration. I also added a short piece of flat brass across bottom of copper 90 for extra support. On muffler pressure I got a "slow stream of bubbles" by dropping pressure line in a cup of water.
Not sure how Magnum or OS attaches their mufflers, but it must be something similiar to Saito. Give it a try-you will love the sound. Really makes a WWI plane sound realistic.
#7
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
RE: 4 - stroke exhaust question
OS and Magnum exhaust systems attach like Saitos do. I actually had khodges' system in mind when I opened this forum.
I had an older OS 1.20 that wouldn't run with just the exhaust pipe, but I don't know if it was the absence of tank pressure or lack of back pressure. I sold that engine, and I now use OS 1.20 FS III engines with pumps so tank pressure is not a concern.
The Magnum .80 4-stroke is another matter. If you guys don't think I'll burn the valves, I'll try running it without the muffler, and see what happens.
In either case, I would use the flex pipe.
Thanks,
Mike
I had an older OS 1.20 that wouldn't run with just the exhaust pipe, but I don't know if it was the absence of tank pressure or lack of back pressure. I sold that engine, and I now use OS 1.20 FS III engines with pumps so tank pressure is not a concern.
The Magnum .80 4-stroke is another matter. If you guys don't think I'll burn the valves, I'll try running it without the muffler, and see what happens.
In either case, I would use the flex pipe.
Thanks,
Mike
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Austin,
TX
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 4 - stroke exhaust question
ORIGINAL: mirwin
I had an older OS 1.20 that wouldn't run with just the exhaust pipe, but I don't know if it was the absence of tank pressure or lack of back pressure. I sold that engine, and I now use OS 1.20 FS III engines with pumps so tank pressure is not a concern.
I had an older OS 1.20 that wouldn't run with just the exhaust pipe, but I don't know if it was the absence of tank pressure or lack of back pressure. I sold that engine, and I now use OS 1.20 FS III engines with pumps so tank pressure is not a concern.
It's not "backpressure" so much as it is the fact that engines tend to suck a little of the exhaust back into the cylinder before the exhaust valve closes, particularly while the engine is idleing. If the engine sucks fresh air back into the exhaust port, the fuel/air mixture goes lean. With a header pipe, the engine sucks back old exhaust gases that have had all of the oxygen burned out of them and the mixture, while it is diluted with exhaust gas, does not go lean.