Starter dilema...
02-26-2006, 11:48 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davis,
OK
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Starter dilema...
I've got a Goldberg Pitts Model 12 Monster bipe with an OS 1.60FX. The starter I had when I bought this plane was a Hangar 9 12v with a Powercore battery pack. This starter, fully charged, will crank the engine maybe twice. So, I bought a Hobbico Torquemaster 180, thinking it would be stronger. I'm powering it off my field battery (12v gel) through the power panel, and it STILL wont crank it. My question is, can I cure this problem by going to a garden tractor type battery, or am I just going to have to bite the bullet and buy a Sullivan Dynatron or something along that line? Before anyone says "why not just flip start it", nope, dont want to get my fingers in line with that carbon fiber prop.
02-27-2006, 03:06 AM
#2
RE: Starter dilema...
ORIGINAL: Lowlevlflyer
I've got a Goldberg Pitts Model 12 Monster bipe with an OS 1.60FX. The starter I had when I bought this plane was a Hangar 9 12v with a Powercore battery pack. This starter, fully charged, will crank the engine maybe twice. So, I bought a Hobbico Torquemaster 180, thinking it would be stronger. I'm powering it off my field battery (12v gel) through the power panel, and it STILL wont crank it. My question is, can I cure this problem by going to a garden tractor type battery, or am I just going to have to bite the bullet and buy a Sullivan Dynatron or something along that line? Before anyone says "why not just flip start it", nope, dont want to get my fingers in line with that carbon fiber prop.
I've got a Goldberg Pitts Model 12 Monster bipe with an OS 1.60FX. The starter I had when I bought this plane was a Hangar 9 12v with a Powercore battery pack. This starter, fully charged, will crank the engine maybe twice. So, I bought a Hobbico Torquemaster 180, thinking it would be stronger. I'm powering it off my field battery (12v gel) through the power panel, and it STILL wont crank it. My question is, can I cure this problem by going to a garden tractor type battery, or am I just going to have to bite the bullet and buy a Sullivan Dynatron or something along that line? Before anyone says "why not just flip start it", nope, dont want to get my fingers in line with that carbon fiber prop.
02-27-2006, 11:08 AM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Anderson,
MO
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
The best starter in the world (and cheapest) for a 160fx is a chicken stick. Once it is primed, one flip clockwise is all it needs. Been flip starting mine for 3 years, easy as pie.
02-27-2006, 11:59 AM
#7
Senior Member
RE: Starter dilema...
You do not necessarily need more voltage, you need more capacity. If you use a lawn mower battery (or car battery) with heavy duty cables any of the above starters will do the job. Your problem in insufficient amperes and/or to small a gage or to long leads.
02-27-2006, 03:01 PM
#10
RE: Starter dilema...
It depends on the size of the engine being started. My 3300's typically last for at least five months if I'm just starting my YS 63 every weekend. If I'm starting my YS 110's, then the 3300's don't seem to last that long, perhaps only around three months. However, those battery packs are NiMH, so I tend to recharge them every two months.
02-27-2006, 03:14 PM
#11
Senior Member
RE: Starter dilema...
My old sullivan heavy duty starts my 1.60 on a garden tractor battery (235 CCA). I only need my dynatron for my MOKI 2.1 and MDS 2.18. Like Rodney said, you need capacity (amps) to be able to start all weekend. The nice thing about the dynatron, however, is that you can set up starter packs like Richard L has and go all the way up to 24 volts and start G-62's and stuff like that, if you can get a good bite on the spinner, usually using the blue cone for larger warbird spinners.
The smaller geared starters like Rodney has are really versatile, more portable than my GTB, but do end up costing a little more, but after all it is a hobby, so spend that money!!!!
The smaller geared starters like Rodney has are really versatile, more portable than my GTB, but do end up costing a little more, but after all it is a hobby, so spend that money!!!!
02-27-2006, 04:01 PM
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davis,
OK
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
Outstanding guys, thanks for the info. I'm going to try a larger battery and see what that does. As far as the leads go, both starters have the factory coiled cord that came attached to them. Is this sufficient, or do I need to go larger? If so, what do you recommend as a replacement?
02-28-2006, 09:03 AM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: seattle,
WA
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
This: http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXKRS1&P=7 is what you need. I have this in addition to a Kavan starter and between the two I've got plenty of starting power. The Kavan is a little pricey when you add the battery case & battery but- at least to me- is well worth it. Dragging cables and a heavy battery isn't my idea of fun.
02-28-2006, 10:57 AM
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davis,
OK
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
Isnt that the same starter as the PowerTork that Central Hobbies sells? Big difference in price, there.
ORIGINAL: SamD
This: http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXKRS1&P=7 is what you need. I have this in addition to a Kavan starter and between the two I've got plenty of starting power. The Kavan is a little pricey when you add the battery case & battery but- at least to me- is well worth it. Dragging cables and a heavy battery isn't my idea of fun.
This: http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXKRS1&P=7 is what you need. I have this in addition to a Kavan starter and between the two I've got plenty of starting power. The Kavan is a little pricey when you add the battery case & battery but- at least to me- is well worth it. Dragging cables and a heavy battery isn't my idea of fun.
02-28-2006, 02:31 PM
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: seattle,
WA
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
I believe it is- with one exception: it doesn't come with batteries as the CH starter does. I already had some packs, though, so the Tower deal was better for me. The Kavan is 12 volts while the Pac Aero is 14.4 so I'm sure it does spin faster; no idea about the gearing, either. Still, the Kavan looks a bit more compact which is nice; mine seems to have good capacity and doesn't seem to need excessive charging. That of course is dependent on the mah rating of the pack, quality of pack and how much it's being used.
Regardless, I love my cordless starters and would have a hard time returning to Sullivans with their stiff cords and heavy batteries.
Regardless, I love my cordless starters and would have a hard time returning to Sullivans with their stiff cords and heavy batteries.
02-28-2006, 07:00 PM
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davis,
OK
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
Solved the problem today... took the Torquemaster 180 back and bought a Kavan gear reduction starter and a garden tractor battery. Spins the 1.60 effortlessly. I will eventually build the 14.4v battery pack setup to use, but for now, this will work fine. Thanks for all the info, guys!
02-28-2006, 08:27 PM
#19
RE: Starter dilema...
ORIGINAL: SamD
The Kavan is 12 volts while the Pac Aero is 14.4 so I'm sure it does spin faster; no idea about the gearing, either. Still, the Kavan looks a bit more compact which is nice
The Kavan is 12 volts while the Pac Aero is 14.4 so I'm sure it does spin faster; no idea about the gearing, either. Still, the Kavan looks a bit more compact which is nice
03-01-2006, 08:57 AM
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davis,
OK
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
The Kavan is rated for 14.4v also, according to the specs on the box. Also, according the the specs on the box and on the Kavan website, the gear ratio on their starter is 5:1, not 2:1.
ORIGINAL: SamD
I believe it is- with one exception: it doesn't come with batteries as the CH starter does. I already had some packs, though, so the Tower deal was better for me. The Kavan is 12 volts while the Pac Aero is 14.4 so I'm sure it does spin faster; no idea about the gearing, either. Still, the Kavan looks a bit more compact which is nice; mine seems to have good capacity and doesn't seem to need excessive charging. That of course is dependent on the mah rating of the pack, quality of pack and how much it's being used.
Regardless, I love my cordless starters and would have a hard time returning to Sullivans with their stiff cords and heavy batteries.
I believe it is- with one exception: it doesn't come with batteries as the CH starter does. I already had some packs, though, so the Tower deal was better for me. The Kavan is 12 volts while the Pac Aero is 14.4 so I'm sure it does spin faster; no idea about the gearing, either. Still, the Kavan looks a bit more compact which is nice; mine seems to have good capacity and doesn't seem to need excessive charging. That of course is dependent on the mah rating of the pack, quality of pack and how much it's being used.
Regardless, I love my cordless starters and would have a hard time returning to Sullivans with their stiff cords and heavy batteries.
03-01-2006, 02:59 PM
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: seattle,
WA
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
5:1, eh? Pretty good reduction. My comment about the 12 volts was related the battery case that is available for the starter: it will only hold 10 sub-c batteries so you're stuck with 12 volts unless some other battery arrangement is utilized. Heck, it's a DC motor, you could throw 24 volts at it and would still work- the longevity might be compromised but it would still spin!
Refrain: I love my cordless starters, I love my cordless starters...
Refrain: I love my cordless starters, I love my cordless starters...
03-01-2006, 04:07 PM
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davis,
OK
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
Slow?? 2,400 to 2,800 RPM are the specs, depending on what 12v source you have it connected to, and 3,400 RPM on 14.4v. That doesnt seem slow to me... what speed does a regular direct drive 12v starter spin at? The Kavan seems to me like it spins faster than either of my other two starters do.
03-03-2006, 12:04 AM
#24
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: York,
PA
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
ORIGINAL: bhole74
The best starter in the world (and cheapest) for a 160fx is a chicken stick. Once it is primed, one flip clockwise is all it needs. Been flip starting mine for 3 years, easy as pie.
The best starter in the world (and cheapest) for a 160fx is a chicken stick. Once it is primed, one flip clockwise is all it needs. Been flip starting mine for 3 years, easy as pie.
Yes, the O.S. 160 starts incredibly easy. Once primed, and as long as the low end is tuned good, it should start very easily. I just grab the spinner with my fingers, give it one quick flick backwards from against the back side of the compression stroke. It bounces off the forward side of the compression stroke and starts forward just that easy. My fingers are never in the prop plane doing this and I get a quicker flick from being closer to the center. As long as everything is working right and tuned right, it should start that easy. This is handy for when your engine stops on the runway. I just keep a glow driver on me just for that situation.
03-03-2006, 02:11 PM
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Davis,
OK
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Starter dilema...
Yeah, mine starts VERY easily, and will hand start with usually just a couple of backward flips, but I just prefer not to.