seagull AT-6 74" 91-120 Please help with C of G
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: isle of wight, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
seagull AT-6 74" 91-120 Please help with C of G
|
#2
RE: seagull AT-6 74
Check this thread for a similar plane:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=9511096
You can do the same graphical calculation and locate CG at 25% of the total MAC formed by both shapes of the wing planform.
I don't know the exact dimensions of your plane as to do an exact calculation following this method.
However, I have used the plane of the link, which I scaled up to have 320 mm of chord at the wing root.
For that setup, the CG should be at 107 mm.
Please do the calculation using the actual dimensions of your model in order to determine the exact CG location in your case.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.asp?m=9511096
You can do the same graphical calculation and locate CG at 25% of the total MAC formed by both shapes of the wing planform.
I don't know the exact dimensions of your plane as to do an exact calculation following this method.
However, I have used the plane of the link, which I scaled up to have 320 mm of chord at the wing root.
For that setup, the CG should be at 107 mm.
Please do the calculation using the actual dimensions of your model in order to determine the exact CG location in your case.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: isle of wight, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: seagull AT-6 74
i'll try the calculation today if i can get my head around it?
seagull at-6 product code 5500162
many thanks for your reply
seagull at-6 product code 5500162
many thanks for your reply
#4
RE: seagull AT-6 74
Yes, it is confusing.
This on-line calculator may make it easier for you:
http://scherrer.pagesperso-orange.fr...glish/mce.html
This link will explain the concept better than I can:
http://adamone.rchomepage.com/index5.htm
What I did was to divide the area of the half wing into two regular shapes.
Then, determined the center of each area, where the MAC is.
Then, I found the point located at 25% of the LE for each area, where the CG for each area should be located at.
Lastly, using the formula included in the schematic, I found a mean location for the CG of the total area, respect to the LE at the wing root.
Once you have the total MAC, you could use any on-line calculator, such as:
http://www.geistware.com/rcmodeling/cg_super_calc.htm
In any event, the 80 mm seem to be too forward a location for the CG of your plane, and the way the plane flew shows nose heaviness.
And, yes, heavy on the nose planes load the wing more, and tip stalls show up.
This thread discusses tip stalls' why and when:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_89...tm.htm#8954798
This on-line calculator may make it easier for you:
http://scherrer.pagesperso-orange.fr...glish/mce.html
This link will explain the concept better than I can:
http://adamone.rchomepage.com/index5.htm
What I did was to divide the area of the half wing into two regular shapes.
Then, determined the center of each area, where the MAC is.
Then, I found the point located at 25% of the LE for each area, where the CG for each area should be located at.
Lastly, using the formula included in the schematic, I found a mean location for the CG of the total area, respect to the LE at the wing root.
Once you have the total MAC, you could use any on-line calculator, such as:
http://www.geistware.com/rcmodeling/cg_super_calc.htm
In any event, the 80 mm seem to be too forward a location for the CG of your plane, and the way the plane flew shows nose heaviness.
And, yes, heavy on the nose planes load the wing more, and tip stalls show up.
This thread discusses tip stalls' why and when:
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_89...tm.htm#8954798