Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Boats > RC Boats General Discussion
Reload this Page >

Lipo receiver packs

Community
Search
Notices
RC Boats General Discussion Discuss general rc boating topics here.
View Poll Results: A poll
Yes
27.27%
No
72.73%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

Lipo receiver packs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2007, 11:41 AM
  #1  
webdr
Thread Starter
 
webdr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Lipo receiver packs

Do any of you run lipo receiver packs and voltage regulators in your boats? Is the reduced weight even noticable? I have a lipo receiver pack and im debating whether or not to put it in my proboat hydro.
Old 09-05-2007, 01:17 PM
  #2  
Ghost in the shell
Senior Member
 
Ghost in the shell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stoke on TrentStaffordshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Lipo receiver packs

3.7v or 7.4v may not be the best option for a reciever, if your speed controller has it, why not do away with a reciver battery pack all together and use the BEC input from the esc. most electronic speed controllers have a BEC system. one that definately does is the Proboat Tornado 50, (Overlander 50), which may be optimized for proboat motors as well, however dont quote me on that!!

Ghostie.
Old 09-05-2007, 01:45 PM
  #3  
webdr
Thread Starter
 
webdr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Lipo receiver packs

this is a nitro boat and the regulator drops the 7.2 volts down to 6.4 (I think) so it doesnt overwork the servos.
Old 09-05-2007, 02:26 PM
  #4  
LtDoc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: McAlester, OK
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Lipo receiver packs

Using physically smaller batteries only has two benefits, weight and volume. The weight aspect also has usefulness, ballast/CG. If the saving in weight or used volume is going to be significant, then sure, why not. If it isn't going to make an appreciable difference, why bother?
- 'Doc
Old 09-05-2007, 04:29 PM
  #5  
Ghost in the shell
Senior Member
 
Ghost in the shell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stoke on TrentStaffordshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Lipo receiver packs

webby. sorry about thinking your boat was e-powered, where I sail, gas boats are not permitted, e-boats, sailers or steam power, though NOT IC
Old 09-06-2007, 05:47 AM
  #6  
mfr02
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Blackpool Lancs, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 32 Posts
Default RE: Lipo receiver packs

Making things smaller and lighter with the same or better performance usually comes with a price tag. Only you can say whether the cost increase over normal batteries is worth the perceived performance improvements. The radio/servos will not work any better, the boat may wind up a few grammes lighter and thus gain a hairsbreadth better performance. Or not, as the case may be.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.