g2 vs AFP
 

well I was flying AFP for a while and I can hover fairly good and can almost torque roll. I can also flatspin in any attitude.
I recently switched to G2 and I can't do anything. everything flies like a log and I don't know what to modify to make them fly better. I can hover the PT-40 better than the ultamate! not good. I have yet to do a flatspin in g2 and am wondering which is more accurate as far as aerobatics. also what can I do to make g2 planes more aerobatic?

RE: g2 vs AFP
 

That's been a common complaint about G2. What made you go from AFP to G2?

Brad

RE: g2 vs AFP
 

weather music and aircraft parameters

RE: g2 vs AFP
 

Well here is my 2 cents
A friend of mine who has deep pockets has
G2, AFP and XTR

IMO just by using the three ( about 2 -3 hrs on each )

G2 is the most unrelistic of the three. OK graphics . Maybe with more tweeking you can fix that
www.realflight.com

XTR has the nicest graphics not bad for realism. BUT because of the graphics you really need a high end
Graphics card. So with a XTR and a graphics card it an expensive sim. Unless you already have a card.

AFP is the most realistic . OK graphics. The least expensive of the three . Runs Very nice on a low end 128 mb card
www.aerofly.com
www.rcsim.de


AGAIN there are IMO with little time on each

Fred..

RE: g2 vs AFP
 

Thanks for that 440GTX. I have AFP & like it.

What about XTR makes it bad for realism?

Brad