Need CG for 100" Antares
#2
Senior Member
RE: Need CG for 100" Antares
Get out your yardstick and go to this application.
http://www.geistware.com/rcmodeling/cg_super_calc.htm
Do the 9 (easy to do) measurements they want and plug them in.
Pick a margin of 10%, and click the compute button.
Read out the CG location.
Change the margin to 20% and click the button.
Read out that CG.
The two CG locations give you the CG range for your airplane.
This works with just about everything we fly, and works excellently well. It's unbiased and accurate as hell. It beats the heck out of sound byte expertise, btw.
BTW, it doesn't take me another 30 seconds to plug in a margin of 15% and get that CG location. I've used this application on everything I've built for the last 15-16 models, and it's been deadly accurate. And I've found that the 15% CG is an almost perfect starting point for my models and the way I want to fly them. I didn't find the application until I'd already plugged together a couple of ARFs that had less than good CG suggestions. I should have done the math, but figured the ARF manual wouldn't be wrong. Wound up having to move stuff around inside since the recommendations made for lousy flying. Wished I'd known about this application then. Or been less lazy. Sometimes the mfg's manual isn't very good for some of our ARFs. Nowadays, I always run a new airplane's measurements through this application. I used to do the same with CL stunters years ago, but had to do the math myself. That taught me how good those formulas work. Now we don't have to do the math.
http://www.geistware.com/rcmodeling/cg_super_calc.htm
Do the 9 (easy to do) measurements they want and plug them in.
Pick a margin of 10%, and click the compute button.
Read out the CG location.
Change the margin to 20% and click the button.
Read out that CG.
The two CG locations give you the CG range for your airplane.
This works with just about everything we fly, and works excellently well. It's unbiased and accurate as hell. It beats the heck out of sound byte expertise, btw.
BTW, it doesn't take me another 30 seconds to plug in a margin of 15% and get that CG location. I've used this application on everything I've built for the last 15-16 models, and it's been deadly accurate. And I've found that the 15% CG is an almost perfect starting point for my models and the way I want to fly them. I didn't find the application until I'd already plugged together a couple of ARFs that had less than good CG suggestions. I should have done the math, but figured the ARF manual wouldn't be wrong. Wound up having to move stuff around inside since the recommendations made for lousy flying. Wished I'd known about this application then. Or been less lazy. Sometimes the mfg's manual isn't very good for some of our ARFs. Nowadays, I always run a new airplane's measurements through this application. I used to do the same with CL stunters years ago, but had to do the math myself. That taught me how good those formulas work. Now we don't have to do the math.
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FrederickMD
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Need CG for 100" Antares
Also read Gordy's Balancing System. I had never heard of this until last week. Following this guidance, I've removed about 4 oz of lead from the nose of my GP Spirit, and the handling has improved significantly.
You can google it or just read it at http://www.slnt.org/articles/gordys_articles/1%20Gordy's%20Ballancing%20System.PDF
Brad
You can google it or just read it at http://www.slnt.org/articles/gordys_articles/1%20Gordy's%20Ballancing%20System.PDF
Brad
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Montrose,
NY
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Need CG for 100" Antares
ORIGINAL: bkdavy
Also read Gordy's Balancing System. I had never heard of this until last week. Following this guidance, I've removed about 4 oz of lead from the nose of my GP Spirit, and the handling has improved significantly.
You can google it or just read it at http://www.slnt.org/articles/gordys_articles/1%20Gordy's%20Ballancing%20System.PDF
Brad
Also read Gordy's Balancing System. I had never heard of this until last week. Following this guidance, I've removed about 4 oz of lead from the nose of my GP Spirit, and the handling has improved significantly.
You can google it or just read it at http://www.slnt.org/articles/gordys_articles/1%20Gordy's%20Ballancing%20System.PDF
Brad
I've used this method and it works! ............
Kurt
#6
Senior Member
RE: Need CG for 100" Antares
Gordy's system works great for gliders. It really ought to be called "Gordy's Glider Balancing System".
And, btw, for all the newbies........... Gordy's guidance isn't just to snatch the nose weight out first thing. But he does suggest ignoring the mfg's suggested balance point and starting at a certain location for the CG. Truth is, this does work for basically straight wings like gliders have, but there really isn't much reason to work to place the CG at any magic starting place if the glider is already rigged as suggested in the manual or you've setup the CG based on reliable computation. Because his proceedure is going to work no matter where the CG starts. And sometimes the suggested CG is the best start location.
Gliders almost always have very straight wings.
And, btw, for all the newbies........... Gordy's guidance isn't just to snatch the nose weight out first thing. But he does suggest ignoring the mfg's suggested balance point and starting at a certain location for the CG. Truth is, this does work for basically straight wings like gliders have, but there really isn't much reason to work to place the CG at any magic starting place if the glider is already rigged as suggested in the manual or you've setup the CG based on reliable computation. Because his proceedure is going to work no matter where the CG starts. And sometimes the suggested CG is the best start location.
Gliders almost always have very straight wings.
#7
Senior Member
RE: Need CG for 100" Antares
BTW, it's RCU's policy that posts not have advertisements in them. There is an entire marketplace here at RCU that works great for selling your stuff. And RCU asks that forum posts not contain sales ads or want ads.
#9
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Need CG for 100" Antares
Just looked at the plans, the CG measures 3 3/16" back from the LE, which happens to also coincide with a line drawn straight down from the back edge of the wing rod.
#11
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Need CG for 100" Antares
Yes, I built one a couple years ago as a test bed for a 4-servo wing installation that I was planning for a Lovesong kit that I had started. It was a nice looking plane but it had some nasty habits. I had flown a Windsong for several years prior so I knew how to handle a full-house ship but I could never seem to get any washout twisted into the wing tips, so the thing would tip stall at the slightest provocation. Otherwise, I think I would have enjoyed it very much. It's on the scrap heap now that I have the Lovesong on line.
#12
My Feedback: (98)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Villages, Florida NJ
Posts: 4,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Need CG for 100" Antares
ORIGINAL: mocgp
so the thing would tip stall at the slightest provocation. Otherwise, I think I would have enjoyed it very much.
so the thing would tip stall at the slightest provocation. Otherwise, I think I would have enjoyed it very much.
Put a trip strip on the tips at 25% of the wing, I glued on some very thin string 1/64 inch tall on the outer 18 inches of the wing. the handling improved and it didn't affect it's thermaling ability. Not really a great plane or airfoil, I think it was a 205 top on a 193 bottom, the Windsongs ate them for lunch.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Downingtown,
PA
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Need CG for 100" Antares
ORIGINAL: soarrich
Boy this brings back memories. I flew one for a while, if you slow down the ailerons just about stopped working, then you put more throw in and tip stalled it. This cured it:
Put a trip strip on the tips at 25% of the wing, I glued on some very thin string 1/64 inch tall on the outer 18 inches of the wing. the handling improved and it didn't affect it's thermaling ability. Not really a great plane or airfoil, I think it was a 205 top on a 193 bottom, the Windsongs ate them for lunch.
ORIGINAL: mocgp
so the thing would tip stall at the slightest provocation. Otherwise, I think I would have enjoyed it very much.
so the thing would tip stall at the slightest provocation. Otherwise, I think I would have enjoyed it very much.
Put a trip strip on the tips at 25% of the wing, I glued on some very thin string 1/64 inch tall on the outer 18 inches of the wing. the handling improved and it didn't affect it's thermaling ability. Not really a great plane or airfoil, I think it was a 205 top on a 193 bottom, the Windsongs ate them for lunch.
Rich,
Can you describe what you did in a little more detail? Were the strips installed on the top of the wing, 25% back from leading edge? I am interested in leaning more about this type of flying and will probably move to a different plane if I am not satisfied with this one. I love all aspect of flying from Senior Pattern like Dirty Birdi's, modern aerobatics like the Extra and Edge, right down to 3D Harrier and classic war birds. Soaring is now in my blood and I joined a soaring only club. What sailplane (not a composit) would you recommend for next keeping in mind that I send tuition checks to multiple universities?
Lastly, I appreciate the comments from all.
John