RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   RC Helicopter Beginners Forum (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-helicopter-beginners-forum-165/)
-   -   ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-helicopter-beginners-forum-165/1938483-thundertiger-pro-39-vs-os-32sxh.html)

day_fiend 06-26-2004 10:36 PM

ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
Which do you guys think is better? I have heard that the original stock TT 30 is rather unreliable, and that the OS 32SXH is very good and reliable, but I haven't heard anything about the TT Pro 39. It is a little bigger, so I assume it would have more power, but I don't know if it would be reliable or not since it's TT. Anyone know anything about it?

day_fiend 06-29-2004 02:02 AM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
Come on, nobody's dealt with a TT39? One of you out there must have!

helicraz 06-29-2004 02:19 AM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
TT's quality control is not as good as OS.
I am using OS32... no prob with it.. but my friend's TT39 has more power than mine OS32.

I am waiting to check out
[link=http://www.os-engines.co.jp/english/2004spring/max37szh/index.htm]OS Max 37 SZ-H Ring[/link]

Charlie 06-29-2004 02:33 AM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
I would go with the TT39. I have an OS32 and it runs great, but I know people that are running the TT39 and it runs great to, plus it has a lot more power. If I ever have to buy another motor for my 30 it would be the TT39. I have read that OS is coming out with a new 37 you mite what to look at.

day_fiend 06-29-2004 08:05 PM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
Does anyone have any idea when the OS37 is coming out?

rcsoar4fun 06-29-2004 08:15 PM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
I think its supposed to be out soon, but I think around $200.

The .32 is a good reliable engine, but really could use more power.

Kristopher

day_fiend 06-30-2004 01:26 AM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
Has anyone here had experience with a Leo37? I just read the small bit about them on raptortechnique and wanted to see if anyone else has ever used one before.

aldomontoya 07-01-2004 04:11 AM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
I got the TT39, it is great, loads of power for its weight etc.

Just one suggestion, get a pipe for it. the standard muffler is rubbish, mine loosened after almost every flight, threw a zimmerman on, awesome sound and power increase.

my 2p...

quaid 07-15-2004 12:02 PM

OS 37 available on Hobbypit
 
Hi all!

The OS 37 is now available from [link=http://www.hobbypit.com]www.hobbypit.com[/link] for a total of $171.

Please PM or e-mail for any questions.

Thanks.

-pkh- 07-15-2004 12:24 PM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
That's almost as much as the OS 50 SX-H ringed engine...
http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...&I=LXVB98&P=ML

siclick33 07-15-2004 12:32 PM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
Maybe, but the OS 50 has been repaced too.

Both the OS37 and the OS 50 Hyper (the new OS 50) are available at www.cyberheli.com

day_fiend 07-15-2004 12:34 PM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
What is a "ringed" engine? It says the new os 37 is ringed, but i think the os 32 is not ringed.

quaid 07-15-2004 11:19 PM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
Hi all.

Yes, it is almost as much as the now replaced 50SX-H and will stay that way for some time:)

At hobbypit we can accept payment as money orders also, just in case you do not wish to send credit card info!

Yes, the 37 is ringed and the 32 was both ringed and ABC.

Thanks:)

pilot77 07-16-2004 09:09 PM

RE: ThunderTiger Pro 39 vs. OS .32SXH
 
id go the TT39 cheap and super powerful if u dun mind fiddling with them to get em right. plus i think they like higher nitro at leats i found they did. . I liked mine so much more than the os 32 .. the os 37 would want to be a great engine for its price..


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:55 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.