Jeti DS-16 High end transmitter is in!
#26
My Feedback: (44)
It sounds like everything is down to the modular level, i.e. a defective PC board is replace with a new board, old board is sent to the factory as a core for further troubleshooting.
If that is the case then board level trouble shooting would not be done at the FL facility as this takes special equipment / training.
#27
Exactly. I would say it's alot easier with autotrim then the standard trim as all you do is fly the plane and it trims it self. If its that much out of trim so that the trim is not enough I assume you got other problems to deal with before blaiming the trim buttons, don't you think ;-)
#28
Thread Starter
Hm, all trimming should be done mechanicly on the ground after the first trim flight. Upping the trim gain in the Tx is not a good way. I assume the DS16 can trim as much as you want too, but I have never tried it as it's the wrong way of doing it
#29
Of course, it was just out of couriosity..uning more than 30% in trims would make it hard to fly anyway. But just in case..
#30
My Feedback: (7)
I downloaded and skimmed the manual and it indicates that if you attempt to connect to a model with a different "series number" receiver than the current model memory was bound to, that it will tell you this and ask if you wish to continue. When they say "series number" do they mean a 9 channel receiver vs an 11 channel receiver vs a 14 channel receiver or do they actually mean "serial number" of the receiver, where each individual receiver has a unique serial # and the system can tell the difference between a 14 channel receiver with a serial # of xxxy and another 14 channel receiver with a serial # of xxxz ? In other words, is this a viable alternative to Spektrums "model match" feature and that the DS16 can tell the difference between individual models, based on receiver serial #, even if they all use 14 channel (or 11 channel or whatever) receivers.
#32
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Clifton,
NJ
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just curious, with all the programming available, is it possible to set up the TX to start a twin? I'm thinking of two independent throttle channels, one for each engine. When starting #1, the second channel is locked out. After #1 has started, you throw a switch that locks out the running engine an therefore you could start #2. When both are running, you throw a switch that will mix the two throttle channels allowing both engines to be controlled.
Jon
Jon
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: , FL
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just curious, with all the programming available, is it possible to set up the TX to start a twin? I'm thinking of two independent throttle channels, one for each engine. When starting #1, the second channel is locked out. After #1 has started, you throw a switch that locks out the running engine an therefore you could start #2. When both are running, you throw a switch that will mix the two throttle channels allowing both engines to be controlled.
Jon
Jon
Zb/Jeti USA
#39
My Feedback: (13)
Just curious, with all the programming available, is it possible to set up the TX to start a twin? I'm thinking of two independent throttle channels, one for each engine. When starting #1, the second channel is locked out. After #1 has started, you throw a switch that locks out the running engine an therefore you could start #2. When both are running, you throw a switch that will mix the two throttle channels allowing both engines to be controlled.
Jon
Jon
#40
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Norfolk , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is certainly a very nicely engineered transmitter, the Apple of the RC world. I have not seen much though about testing its frequency hopping and how it works. It would be nice to know more. One thing I noticed that apart from the digital trims switch issue there does not appear to be a trim that can be assigned separately to the steering channel. With the 12FG we have found this a very helpful feature. The radio is packed with other nice features and looks worth considering but would need to know more about how well it works compared to a Futaba.
John
John
#41
My Feedback: (39)
John,
there is no "issue" with the trim switch, it all comes down to personal preferences. Most planes if build correctly don't need any trim at all, so that discussion is highly overrated to my mind.
You can assign ANY knob, lever or switch to ANY function. Meaning that if you want to have a separate trim for the steering servo, you just assign it in the menu and that's it. You can even adjust the trim max value.
Thomas
there is no "issue" with the trim switch, it all comes down to personal preferences. Most planes if build correctly don't need any trim at all, so that discussion is highly overrated to my mind.
You can assign ANY knob, lever or switch to ANY function. Meaning that if you want to have a separate trim for the steering servo, you just assign it in the menu and that's it. You can even adjust the trim max value.
Thomas
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: , FL
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is certainly a very nicely engineered transmitter, the Apple of the RC world. I have not seen much though about testing its frequency hopping and how it works. It would be nice to know more. One thing I noticed that apart from the digital trims switch issue there does not appear to be a trim that can be assigned separately to the steering channel. With the 12FG we have found this a very helpful feature. The radio is packed with other nice features and looks worth considering but would need to know more about how well it works compared to a Futaba.
John
John
You can also assign multiple functions to same switches or multiple switches to same functions.
Zb/Esprit Model
#44
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: WinkelZH, SWITZERLAND
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But exept for the trim Buttons it's a very nice System. Love it!
Regards, Walter
On my Wishlist: A variable Timer
#45
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Norfolk , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nobody has posted yet about how the system works and how it compares to Futaba. Surely people are not buying just because of what it looks like or the telemetry features.
Despite what Thomas says the trim is an issue, we often fly planes that are previously unflown scratch built designs and with the pilots hands keeping the plane flying it is just not possible to try and find the trim buttons. I like Ilja Grum solution with the little joysticks though not sure how they are attached. We normally have 2 rotary dials used, one for gyro gain and one for variable flap settings. That rules out using one of them for steering trim. The same goes for the switches. They are nearly all used up for dual rates, landing gear and air brakes. None of the switches are adjustable like the rotary dials.
John
Despite what Thomas says the trim is an issue, we often fly planes that are previously unflown scratch built designs and with the pilots hands keeping the plane flying it is just not possible to try and find the trim buttons. I like Ilja Grum solution with the little joysticks though not sure how they are attached. We normally have 2 rotary dials used, one for gyro gain and one for variable flap settings. That rules out using one of them for steering trim. The same goes for the switches. They are nearly all used up for dual rates, landing gear and air brakes. None of the switches are adjustable like the rotary dials.
John
#46
My Feedback: (7)
In the case of a possibly badly trimmed new aircraft, it would seem easiest to use the auto trim feature. All trim controls require you to move your thumb off of the stick to adjust the trim which on a badly out of trim aircraft is a problem. Seems auto-trim eliminates that problem.
#47
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brunswick,
GA
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'trim' is an overrated item ?
Perhaps in your world it is a minor issue but I seriously doubt you have flown all of your builds and managed to do
so without trimming .
That comment notwithstanding the Jeti system is a highly developed system which is directly reflected in the market price .
Having said that it is beyond reason to explain the designers intent in producing a design which is seriously short on trim lever definition on the transmitter face.
I have no desire to take my eyes off of a fast model in order to locate elevator trim.....regardless of the availability of auto trim .
That portion of the transmitter needs to be revisited by the manufacturer . Period .
Perhaps in your world it is a minor issue but I seriously doubt you have flown all of your builds and managed to do
so without trimming .
That comment notwithstanding the Jeti system is a highly developed system which is directly reflected in the market price .
Having said that it is beyond reason to explain the designers intent in producing a design which is seriously short on trim lever definition on the transmitter face.
I have no desire to take my eyes off of a fast model in order to locate elevator trim.....regardless of the availability of auto trim .
That portion of the transmitter needs to be revisited by the manufacturer . Period .
#48
My Feedback: (6)
I like to know more about how the RF works as well. How many of the 81 available channels does Jeti "hop" across? Does it hop across the entire band or a small portion like Futaba and Spektrum?
Does it "look" ahead and avoid busy/ noisy channels or does it jump onto them anyway like Futaba and Spek? None of the RF questions seem to be answered in any of the sales literature.
Mike
Does it "look" ahead and avoid busy/ noisy channels or does it jump onto them anyway like Futaba and Spek? None of the RF questions seem to be answered in any of the sales literature.
Mike
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: , FL
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I completely disagree, trim with 4 buttons located in logical place is much better then trying to locate trims all over the face of the Tx. (Yes I liked the Multiplex solution as well)
I like the fact that I can set the trim in both directions simultaneously.
Zb/Jeti
But with Jeti Radio systems, If you do not like you have few options to change it.
Other radio systems will NOT give you any option.
1) Cross Assign trims on opposite side
2) Assign trims on Knobs, Levers or anywhere you like
3) Use AUTO TRIM
4) Use Trim Stick
I like the fact that I can set the trim in both directions simultaneously.
Zb/Jeti
But with Jeti Radio systems, If you do not like you have few options to change it.
Other radio systems will NOT give you any option.
1) Cross Assign trims on opposite side
2) Assign trims on Knobs, Levers or anywhere you like
3) Use AUTO TRIM
4) Use Trim Stick
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: , FL
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are no such a things as 81 available channels, that's misconception started by Futaba also there is also no such a thing as "look/avoid" busy channels. EVERY radio in a order to be CE and FCC approved has to jump in pseudorandom configuration. We can not cheat Physics, you have "only" 16 available channels. Where Jeti is different is that system transmits more like original JR in DMSS pattern.
It's called: Wide Band Frequency Hopping
What it does is spreads the Information over wider channel and chances of information being lost or "drown" in background noise is lover.
Also Jeti System uses 2x RF modules with 4x Antennas, Tx always waits for signal to be conformed and in next transmission cycle it uses antennas with better reception. Same with Receivers.
Zb/Jeti USA
It's called: Wide Band Frequency Hopping
What it does is spreads the Information over wider channel and chances of information being lost or "drown" in background noise is lover.
Also Jeti System uses 2x RF modules with 4x Antennas, Tx always waits for signal to be conformed and in next transmission cycle it uses antennas with better reception. Same with Receivers.
Zb/Jeti USA
Last edited by Jeti USA; 11-30-2013 at 08:17 AM.