Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

X29 Fighter

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

X29 Fighter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2015, 02:58 PM
  #1  
mikes68charger
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (34)
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: , OH
Posts: 1,962
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default X29 Fighter

Hey guys when I was a kid I has a modle of a F15 and X29. I dreamed of these 2 planes as a kid

Well I got my F15. But looking for a turbine x29 or SU47. Are there any kits for these foward sweeping wing jets?
Old 08-27-2015, 04:22 PM
  #2  
invertmast
My Feedback: (23)
 
invertmast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Capon Bridge, WV
Posts: 8,198
Received 225 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

I havent seen one in years
Old 08-27-2015, 04:38 PM
  #3  
mikes68charger
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (34)
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: , OH
Posts: 1,962
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by invertmast
I havent seen one in years
It's sad. I just picked up a Byron F20 it looks like it could be converted to a X29 with some work
Old 08-27-2015, 04:56 PM
  #4  
invertmast
My Feedback: (23)
 
invertmast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Capon Bridge, WV
Posts: 8,198
Received 225 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

I know someone had a magazine article that converted the Byron F16 to an F16XL, i vaguely remember seeing something like that for the F20 to a X29 as well.
Old 08-27-2015, 05:13 PM
  #5  
mikes68charger
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (34)
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: , OH
Posts: 1,962
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by invertmast
I know someone had a magazine article that converted the Byron F16 to an F16XL, i vaguely remember seeing something like that for the F20 to a X29 as well.
Ya I had a Byron F16 that I was going to convert to a XL but the planes I bought for it didn't mach and it had a lot of complex coars that the foam cutters didn't want to make
Old 08-27-2015, 05:54 PM
  #6  
Zeeb
My Feedback: (41)
 
Zeeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St George, Utah UT
Posts: 5,686
Received 67 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

IIRC, the X-29 would not fly without the onboard computers. Not sure how you'd duplicate that in a model?
Old 08-27-2015, 05:55 PM
  #7  
invertmast
My Feedback: (23)
 
invertmast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Capon Bridge, WV
Posts: 8,198
Received 225 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeeb
IIRC, the X-29 would not fly without the onboard computers. Not sure how you'd duplicate that in a model?

On board computer... Three axis gyro... Whats the difference.... Haha
Old 08-27-2015, 06:51 PM
  #8  
Countryboy
My Feedback: (25)
 
Countryboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lawrenceburg, KY
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikes68charger
It's sad. I just picked up a Byron F20 it looks like it could be converted to a X29 with some work
Pretty sure that article was done by the late Ivan Munninghoft "sp". I think I have the original article here somewhere.
Old 08-28-2015, 01:01 AM
  #9  
Jgwright
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Norfolk , UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Both the X29 and the Su47 have flown successfully as models.

Turbine model Su47

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HorHb8IJLNo X29 turbine model

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxBAoeUxK7Y
Ron Sweeney had a IC ducted fan model that flew many years ago in the UK. It had no gyro. It is a common misconception that these planes need a gyro because the full size will not fly without computer aids. There is a foam Su47 that flies very well.

You have to be sure to make the wings have 'wash in' rather than 'wash out'.

John

Last edited by Jgwright; 08-28-2015 at 01:03 AM.
Old 08-28-2015, 05:06 AM
  #10  
FMRR
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

John, Thanks for posting the two videos, very very nice.
Old 08-28-2015, 05:34 AM
  #11  
FalconWings
My Feedback: (57)
 
FalconWings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 6,995
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The main reason full scale jets need an FCC to fly is not necessarily because they are inherently unstable, it is because the design CG makes them unstable. F-16. for example, is tail heavy by design. FCC compensates for that, but it also allows for great manouverability when the flight control laws are "relaxed" during specific flight envelopes.
But we know we can adjust the CG of the F-16 and make it a very good flying, stable, airframe.

Same applies to te X29, SU-47.........get the right CG, and they will fly good.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.