Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
Reload this Page >

Wishing for a P70 sized sport jet that looks good, I can't be the only one.....

Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Wishing for a P70 sized sport jet that looks good, I can't be the only one.....

Old 06-18-2016, 07:31 AM
  #51  
Jetset
My Feedback: (2)
 
Jetset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Picton, ON, CANADA
Posts: 979
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Jets

Bolly Scorpion was another one I always wanted to get. Can't find a half decent pic of one though....
Here's an olf video of one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ranm3h0NVcs
Attached Images  
Old 06-18-2016, 07:34 AM
  #52  
Jetset
My Feedback: (2)
 
Jetset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Picton, ON, CANADA
Posts: 979
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I actually see that Scorpion I posted was converted to EDF
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTthojQk-HY
Old 06-18-2016, 08:38 AM
  #53  
wildnloose
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That XXX is nice, it's on my list because of the looks. But airframe is $1200, now add retracts, struts and turbine conversion kit. Kinda puts it in the realm of all the new planes we have around (not sub $1000 airframes).
The PAF Sting Evo ($914 US last time I checked) is also something I'm looking at (like the looks of the XXX better, plus the XXX is an arf, the Sting Evo is a kit).
This is why I'm also looking at the Reaction 54 kit. You can buy it and retracts for around $800 (yes I know, also a little time, and it doesn't look like a jet). Plus I found a scheme that I can live with.
Old 06-18-2016, 09:09 AM
  #54  
dw_crash
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by wildnloose View Post
That XXX is nice, it's on my list because of the looks. But airframe is $1200, now add retracts, struts and turbine conversion kit. Kinda puts it in the realm of all the new planes we have around (not sub $1000 airframes).
The PAF Sting Evo ($914 US last time I checked) is also something I'm looking at (like the looks of the XXX better, plus the XXX is an arf, the Sting Evo is a kit).
This is why I'm also looking at the Reaction 54 kit. You can buy it and retracts for around $800 (yes I know, also a little time, and it doesn't look like a jet). Plus I found a scheme that I can live with.
I have flown a reaction 54. It was fun with a PST P600 clone of a Wren. Flew like a big pattern ship.

Could cheat and skip the retracts to save time and cash.

dw_crash

Last edited by dw_crash; 06-18-2016 at 09:10 AM. Reason: clarification
Old 06-18-2016, 09:30 AM
  #55  
Midas D.
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: holland, NETHERLANDS
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LA jetguy View Post
I recently ordered the JTM XXX v.2... Would be perfect for a P70, but I'm installing a Jets Munt 100X (with inflight restart)...

David
Please keep us posted on this one.
I had V1 but that really was a waste of time and money cause of all the things wrong with it.

I still got my eyes on one and it fit's in my opinion the jet what we are looking for on this tread.

But then it has to be an real V2 with all the hick up's taken out, otherwise i would not burn my fingers on it again, after my V1 xxx
Old 06-18-2016, 10:11 AM
  #56  
wildnloose
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

except for price.
Old 06-18-2016, 10:17 AM
  #57  
wildnloose
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Owasso, OK
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think retracts are a necessary evil for turbine jets.
Old 06-18-2016, 05:11 PM
  #58  
Mike06659
 
Mike06659's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mercersburg, PA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just maiden my HSD Super Viper Turbine "Foamy" today and they really flew nice! I received the PNP version and added a JetCat P-60 to push it around nicely. I got mine from dragonhobbyusa but I think Global Jet Club is now carrying them as well.
Mike
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Super Viper.jpg
Views:	1189
Size:	654.4 KB
ID:	2168605  

Last edited by Mike06659; 06-18-2016 at 05:36 PM.
Old 06-18-2016, 05:57 PM
  #59  
mikedenilin
My Feedback: (67)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yes, they are nice and easy to fly. We are now the exclusive distributor for this Turbofoam jet, we have turbinized it and upgraded all the parts and servos so they now fly more like composite airframe. Wings are also modified so it's more symmetrical in performance. We introduce it at First in Flight and will fly a bunch of them at Kentucky Jet. If you have any 12-14 pounder paper weight, you can give it a life instead with this peppy jet.

Mike
Old 06-19-2016, 01:05 AM
  #60  
i3dm
My Feedback: (51)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reut,Israel
Posts: 4,296
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gunradd View Post
Well I know you dont like the T-1 (aka) fortune but its all in the paint scheme I think. Kingtech will have one at Kentucky Jets if anyone wants stick time.

Not sure if it will fly on a 80 size engine. I will be building one in a few weeks for Kingtech so I will let you know if it looks ok for an 80 class engine.

Also talking about engines soon we will have a new K80 that is about the size and weight of the little K60


i built the prototype #001 and im sure that while being a big bird (2.2m), due to its light weight will fly just fine on an 80.
i will test this combo soon too, with K80.
Old 07-28-2016, 01:39 AM
  #61  
Jetset
My Feedback: (2)
 
Jetset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Picton, ON, CANADA
Posts: 979
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I wish I had the know how and more so..the TIME..to build a plug and make molds because I have been playing with that idea for a long time. Have a sport jet in my head that's part, F-5, T-38, and F-20.
Old school!
Old 07-28-2016, 02:39 AM
  #62  
LN-JET
 
LN-JET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Stjordal, NORWAY
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

About 10-12 years ago there was a sport jet from Germany, called Jurassic. I have done some small modifications to it, and tried to cad it, making it suitable for laser cutting. A friend of mine started building the prototype, but then he suddenly could afford ARF jets ;-)
It was made for 100-120N engines, but could probably be scaled down a bit.
http://www.jetsweden.se/forum/e107_p...topic.php?8268
Old 07-28-2016, 04:17 PM
  #63  
Jetset
My Feedback: (2)
 
Jetset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Picton, ON, CANADA
Posts: 979
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Hey, now that looks pretty good! I prefer more of a T-38/F-5 tail (I know I'm picky!) but that looks very nice man!
Have you done anymore with this? A built up wood kit would be cool!
You fuse shape is perfect WIsh I could do CAD like this

Last edited by Jetset; 07-28-2016 at 04:32 PM. Reason: typo
Old 07-28-2016, 05:11 PM
  #64  
Doug Cronkhite
My Feedback: (34)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,813
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Wright View Post
The Bandit ARF MKII is a great plane for a p-70. It's lighter than the older MKI and with the inner geardoors on the mains its a much cleaner airframe. The p-70 would push it along at a really nice speed too..
Agreed. My old BVM F-86 flew fantastic with the P-70 too. People have been overpowering the Bandit for a long time and somehow a P-120 or greater became what you "needed" in one. People forget the original Bandit flew on a JPX turbine that barely put out 8 pounds of thrust installed.
Old 07-28-2016, 05:16 PM
  #65  
Doug Cronkhite
My Feedback: (34)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,813
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Maybe Tom Cook would be willing to sell the tooling to the Starfire 2C to someone? I'm 100% in agreement though that I wish BVM would have kept the smaller jets available on a custom order basis. A K-45 powered Aggressor III would be a hell of a combo!
Old 07-28-2016, 05:45 PM
  #66  
Jetset
My Feedback: (2)
 
Jetset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Picton, ON, CANADA
Posts: 979
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

So did BVM trash all his Aggressor and Viper tooling?
Old 07-29-2016, 07:58 AM
  #67  
kevin
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: columbus, OH
Posts: 121
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I like all of those jets you posted but I am very partial to the red Aggressor II, It flies very well!




Originally Posted by LGM Graphix View Post

Not everything about these was beautiful, but the style was awesome, the size was right, they looked like jets. It's what I grew up with. I miss designs like these. Even today's jets that are similar don't look the same. The flash has something droppy about the fuselage that I just don't like, The Bandit ARF is ok, I just don't want a 5K ARF. I enjoy building when I have time, many of these jets didn't even take that long to build, they flew well, yes they weren't "light trainer jets" but what we considered trainer jets back then was a far cry from what trainer jets today are.
Old 07-29-2016, 08:10 AM
  #68  
Bob_B
My Feedback: (11)
 
Bob_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bluegrass State of Mind
Posts: 4,341
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kevin View Post
I like all of those jets you posted but I am very partial to the red Aggressor II, It flies very well!
That's a hanger queen! I thought you said it landed solid, you know like a lead Sled.
Old 07-29-2016, 09:59 AM
  #69  
kevin
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: columbus, OH
Posts: 121
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Leave my hangar queen alone. At Least I fly my jets before selling them. Lands just fine, and now it has brakes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1mMRj3JOco

Originally Posted by Bob_B View Post
That's a hanger queen! I thought you said it landed solid, you know like a lead Sled.
Old 07-29-2016, 10:36 AM
  #70  
Bob_B
My Feedback: (11)
 
Bob_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bluegrass State of Mind
Posts: 4,341
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Good thing you did, took 1000' to stop that sled!

Last edited by Bob_B; 07-29-2016 at 10:41 AM.
Old 07-29-2016, 11:38 AM
  #71  
joeflyer
My Feedback: (47)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 2,863
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wildnloose View Post
This is why I'm also looking at the Reaction 54 kit. You can buy it and retracts for around $800 (yes I know, also a little time, and it doesn't look like a jet). Plus I found a scheme that I can live with.
The Reaction can be made to look more like a jet by adding inlets and a canopy.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	2015giantscale1.JPG
Views:	1155
Size:	1.45 MB
ID:	2174923   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01908.JPG
Views:	1173
Size:	136.8 KB
ID:	2174924  
Old 07-29-2016, 12:35 PM
  #72  
dw_crash
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've flown a Reaction 54. It is a fun plane. Some dislike cause it not a sexy, zippy, jet. Just a good flying, fun, sport plane that happens to have a turbine instead of prop. Sure....no 200 mph rocket, but fun in other ways like a sport plane should be.

dw_crash
Old 07-29-2016, 02:01 PM
  #73  
reo
My Feedback: (130)
 
reo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Millet, AB, CANADA
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dw_crash View Post
I've flown a Reaction 54. It is a fun plane. Some dislike cause it not a sexy, zippy, jet. Just a good flying, fun, sport plane that happens to have a turbine instead of prop. Sure....no 200 mph rocket, but fun in other ways like a sport plane should be.

dw_crash
downside though, Dave, is with down canted engine the Reaction leaves marks in the grass wherever it goes. (taxiing, runups and takeoff rolls are all very evident a few days later
Old 07-29-2016, 08:50 PM
  #74  
LGM Graphix
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (22)
 
LGM Graphix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, CANADA
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I had an R54 and they are great but they lack all of the criteria in the small fast and sexy category haha.
Old 07-30-2016, 08:05 AM
  #75  
dw_crash
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Reo...I give you that.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.