Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
#2102
My Feedback: (11)
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
The Jetcat ECU does NOT require the Throttle channel to be reversed, NOT sure about other ECU's!
ORIGINAL: BaldEagel
I have a 12FG set up on 2.4Ghz, the only anomaly is that in the instructions for the turbine it says that after setting the Tx fail safe with the ATV and trim at 100% you then have to teach the ECU the fail safe condition, this may require you to re-set the ATV in the Tx to under 75% to allow the ECU to recognise the fail safe condition, this seem to be an anomaly in the Futaba sets only, Oh also throttle will have to be revearsed.
Mike
I have a 12FG set up on 2.4Ghz, the only anomaly is that in the instructions for the turbine it says that after setting the Tx fail safe with the ATV and trim at 100% you then have to teach the ECU the fail safe condition, this may require you to re-set the ATV in the Tx to under 75% to allow the ECU to recognise the fail safe condition, this seem to be an anomaly in the Futaba sets only, Oh also throttle will have to be revearsed.
Mike
#2103
My Feedback: (24)
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
ORIGINAL: Mr DJ
Gents, a bit of help real quick, for I know you already have yours setup. Joe Nall requires the below; I plan on hitting them up for their 2010 event but I need to set my 12Z for my DA 150 and evo Booter 160 (4) and one AMT 450 Turbines. Thanks in advance… Mr DJ
For 2005, we’re asking that all planes be equipped with a functioning failsafe system which, in the event of a loss of signal, will reduce the throttle to idle. You’ll be asked to demonstrate this capability on the flight line before you take off. With the engine running, you’ll shut off your transmitter and demonstrate the low-throttle hold. How you decide to program your other surfaces (hold last position, neutral – whatever) is your choice – these things are largely a matter of personal preference. But low-throttle hold is an imperative.
Bob
#2104
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
ORIGINAL: Mr DJ
Chad
As you know, I haven't started those puppies yet; still in their boxes [img][/img] but will they perform automatically as stated above - if I turn off my transmitter, they will auto go to idle?
Thanks...
Mr DJ
Chad
As you know, I haven't started those puppies yet; still in their boxes [img][/img] but will they perform automatically as stated above - if I turn off my transmitter, they will auto go to idle?
Thanks...
Mr DJ
This has been an AMA rule for several years.....
Greg
#2105
My Feedback: (14)
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
Futaba and JR make a different default choice on how the pulse width varies with stick position. Most RC accessory electronic gear (ECUs, ESCs, etc) are set up assuming the JR default. On a Futaba system you would typically reverse the throttle channel and then set up.
It is not a question of one brand of ECU "requiring" reversing or not, it's an issue with an arbitrary choice that JR and Futaba made differently. It is not a "fault", though clearly it would be easier for all of us if the two mfrs had made the same choice. I don't own a JetCat but if they went the extra mile on their software and allow the "teaching" to work with both JR and Futaba signal conventions, bravo to them! Maybe that's what BE means...after all they are generally acknowledged as having the best ECU software...
To comply with AMA regulations, Greg and Bob are right on the money, it is required that we set up our radios and ECUs (both must be set to work correctly together) so that with 2 seconds of loss of signal (which can be a dead RX, perhaps due to a dead battery ... OR from a failsafe condition), the turbine must shut off.
To set this up correctly is slightly different for JR and Futaba. The JR gang can chime in about the 50 or 75% of throw, multiple bind ritual, I'll cover the Futaba ritual for the 12 and 14 systems, as I practice it. You need to test your own setup by killing the TX and see the turbine shutdown to make sure you are ok ... again this is how I do it, not the "gold standard" .. you have to be confident in your own setup.
1) Set the throttle up for +/- 100 % ATV, and reverse the channel to make it work the same "direction" JR does (per comments above maybe not necessary with JetCat .. but is with Gaspar's FADEC) .. but won't hurt to do this in any case.
2) Teach the ECU your hi/lo throttle and trim settings
3) Go to the ATV screen and set the throttle ATV in the direction of IDLE to -125% (arbitrary, but must be outside the +/-100 range that you just "taught" the ECU .. way "below" stick down/trim down)
4) Go to the FAILSAFE setup screen. Take the stick and trim low, and set the Failsafe at this value (e.g. the button must say "F/S" not "Hold") and push the button to the right to set the failsafe position to this extreme "below idle cutoff" value (the -125%)
5) Go back to ATV and set the throttle back to +/- 100.
Failsafe setup is now Done.
This accomplishes the same thing that the JR ritual does...
BTW, if you want to you can also set up a battery fail safe to do something (typically go to low throttle) when the RX battery goes low .. then "release" it by taking the throttle stick to idle. This is useful on a prop plane where F/S does not have to kill the engine, but not so useful on a turbine. But you can set some other channel to do something on low RX batt and set some other control than throttle to "release" it. I must admit, I have not used this feature with a turbine model .. maybe something to think about. Very useful for prop planes, though.
The idea is this: The way the radio "tells" the ECU that a failsafe condition has happened is to go to a throttle setting outside of the range that was taught. Unless you are using the two-input signal method, this is the only way the ECU can know there is a failsafe! Again, other than the RX throttle signal going away (dead batt, unplugged wire, etc) this is the only way the ECU knows that a failsafe has happened.
Specific behavior on receiving a failsafe is set up in the ECU, and each is a little different. Some let you react to a failsafe by going to a pre-set thrust, but after two seconds, they must shut down to be AMA legal. A lot of guys go to a low/intermediate thrust setting (e.g. 10-20%) and drop the landing gear so they know they have a failsafe .. and if control is back within two seconds, they are back to normal but at least know something happened.
To be Joe Nall-legal with a non-turbine, you only have to go to idle, not shutoff, so you can just set your TX throttle to the idle setting and push the F/S setting button there. For the turbine, you have to force the TX to output a signal outside the teaching range.
You will see threads where people have mysterious turbine shutdowns if they have some setup that takes the throttle setting outside the taught range .. above or below the range!. I believe this is common with JR setups when you don't do the second post-F/S rebinding.
Anyway, it is a little alarming if people are flying turbines without a correct F/S setup .. and I guess without ever testing it .. I sure hope not! I would suggest that it's well worth it to start up the turbine take it to 1/4 throttle or so, be ready with a blower just in case there is any issue getting a cooldown cycle initiated, and shut off the TX. The RX should go into failsafe. If the radio was left at default (hold, or go to IDLE), having never set up failsafe, the turbine will either hold its speed or go to idle, but would not shut down.
A correct F/S setup will shut it down and most ECUs will report Failsafe as the reason for shutdown. Then and only then are you good to go, and AMA legal (and common-sense compliant!)
Dave McQueeney
It is not a question of one brand of ECU "requiring" reversing or not, it's an issue with an arbitrary choice that JR and Futaba made differently. It is not a "fault", though clearly it would be easier for all of us if the two mfrs had made the same choice. I don't own a JetCat but if they went the extra mile on their software and allow the "teaching" to work with both JR and Futaba signal conventions, bravo to them! Maybe that's what BE means...after all they are generally acknowledged as having the best ECU software...
To comply with AMA regulations, Greg and Bob are right on the money, it is required that we set up our radios and ECUs (both must be set to work correctly together) so that with 2 seconds of loss of signal (which can be a dead RX, perhaps due to a dead battery ... OR from a failsafe condition), the turbine must shut off.
To set this up correctly is slightly different for JR and Futaba. The JR gang can chime in about the 50 or 75% of throw, multiple bind ritual, I'll cover the Futaba ritual for the 12 and 14 systems, as I practice it. You need to test your own setup by killing the TX and see the turbine shutdown to make sure you are ok ... again this is how I do it, not the "gold standard" .. you have to be confident in your own setup.
1) Set the throttle up for +/- 100 % ATV, and reverse the channel to make it work the same "direction" JR does (per comments above maybe not necessary with JetCat .. but is with Gaspar's FADEC) .. but won't hurt to do this in any case.
2) Teach the ECU your hi/lo throttle and trim settings
3) Go to the ATV screen and set the throttle ATV in the direction of IDLE to -125% (arbitrary, but must be outside the +/-100 range that you just "taught" the ECU .. way "below" stick down/trim down)
4) Go to the FAILSAFE setup screen. Take the stick and trim low, and set the Failsafe at this value (e.g. the button must say "F/S" not "Hold") and push the button to the right to set the failsafe position to this extreme "below idle cutoff" value (the -125%)
5) Go back to ATV and set the throttle back to +/- 100.
Failsafe setup is now Done.
This accomplishes the same thing that the JR ritual does...
BTW, if you want to you can also set up a battery fail safe to do something (typically go to low throttle) when the RX battery goes low .. then "release" it by taking the throttle stick to idle. This is useful on a prop plane where F/S does not have to kill the engine, but not so useful on a turbine. But you can set some other channel to do something on low RX batt and set some other control than throttle to "release" it. I must admit, I have not used this feature with a turbine model .. maybe something to think about. Very useful for prop planes, though.
The idea is this: The way the radio "tells" the ECU that a failsafe condition has happened is to go to a throttle setting outside of the range that was taught. Unless you are using the two-input signal method, this is the only way the ECU can know there is a failsafe! Again, other than the RX throttle signal going away (dead batt, unplugged wire, etc) this is the only way the ECU knows that a failsafe has happened.
Specific behavior on receiving a failsafe is set up in the ECU, and each is a little different. Some let you react to a failsafe by going to a pre-set thrust, but after two seconds, they must shut down to be AMA legal. A lot of guys go to a low/intermediate thrust setting (e.g. 10-20%) and drop the landing gear so they know they have a failsafe .. and if control is back within two seconds, they are back to normal but at least know something happened.
To be Joe Nall-legal with a non-turbine, you only have to go to idle, not shutoff, so you can just set your TX throttle to the idle setting and push the F/S setting button there. For the turbine, you have to force the TX to output a signal outside the teaching range.
You will see threads where people have mysterious turbine shutdowns if they have some setup that takes the throttle setting outside the taught range .. above or below the range!. I believe this is common with JR setups when you don't do the second post-F/S rebinding.
Anyway, it is a little alarming if people are flying turbines without a correct F/S setup .. and I guess without ever testing it .. I sure hope not! I would suggest that it's well worth it to start up the turbine take it to 1/4 throttle or so, be ready with a blower just in case there is any issue getting a cooldown cycle initiated, and shut off the TX. The RX should go into failsafe. If the radio was left at default (hold, or go to IDLE), having never set up failsafe, the turbine will either hold its speed or go to idle, but would not shut down.
A correct F/S setup will shut it down and most ECUs will report Failsafe as the reason for shutdown. Then and only then are you good to go, and AMA legal (and common-sense compliant!)
Dave McQueeney
#2107
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
ORIGINAL: R_Belluomini
The Jetcat ECU does NOT require the Throttle channel to be reversed, NOT sure about other ECU's!
The Jetcat ECU does NOT require the Throttle channel to be reversed, NOT sure about other ECU's!
Mike
#2109
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
I have two JetCat's which both required the throttle to be reversed before I could get the fail safe to work correctly, this is using a 12FG Futaba Tx.
Mike
Mike
#2110
My Feedback: (11)
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
Hmmmm. I hear what you are saying. I helped my friend setup his Titan with a 12FGA.
I know that I have to reverse the Throttle for ESC's to respond correctly but I thought I read in the JetCat manual were it was not necessary as the ECU would learn the pulse. Reversing the direction is simple enough or there is the option to reverse the function in the Hardware menu too!
I know that I have to reverse the Throttle for ESC's to respond correctly but I thought I read in the JetCat manual were it was not necessary as the ECU would learn the pulse. Reversing the direction is simple enough or there is the option to reverse the function in the Hardware menu too!
#2111
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
As far as I know its something to do with single channel operation where the ECU is expecting to see the trim at one end of the throttle movement and not the other to allow a normal shut down, or indeed a fail safe at that end of the throttle responce.
Mike
Mike
#2114
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
ORIGINAL: davidgeorge212
Are the futaba 12fg radios compatible with the 6ch Futaba 606fs receivers? If so how do you get it to work?
Are the futaba 12fg radios compatible with the 6ch Futaba 606fs receivers? If so how do you get it to work?
Hope that helps.
Mike
#2117
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
Oh ok, I am away at college and I dont have the transmitter with me so I cant check it for sure but I know it came with that receiver.
#2118
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dunstable, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
ORIGINAL: davidgeorge212
Oh ok, I am away at college and I dont have the transmitter with me so I cant check it for sure but I know it came with that receiver.
Oh ok, I am away at college and I dont have the transmitter with me so I cant check it for sure but I know it came with that receiver.
Paul
#2119
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miramar,
FL
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
#2120
My Feedback: (1)
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
ORIGINAL: BaldEagel
The 12FG is compatible with the 606, but only with the TM14 Module in 7 channel mode, you change the mode in ''Linkage Menu'' under ''Frequency'' change from FASST Multi too FASST 7 channel.
Hope that helps.
Mike
ORIGINAL: davidgeorge212
Are the futaba 12fg radios compatible with the 6ch Futaba 606fs receivers? If so how do you get it to work?
Are the futaba 12fg radios compatible with the 6ch Futaba 606fs receivers? If so how do you get it to work?
Hope that helps.
Mike
Check Futaba website on compatability !!
#2122
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dunstable, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
ORIGINAL: DougV
The R606FS will work fine with any of the Futaba (air) radios, the issue was with the TM-7 and TM-8 modules only.
Doug.
The R606FS will work fine with any of the Futaba (air) radios, the issue was with the TM-7 and TM-8 modules only.
Doug.
Paul
#2123
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dunstable, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
ORIGINAL: DougV
Hi Paul,
Have you seen this new Futaba S-Bus setup? http://www.rcmarket.org/s-bus-pg-32.html
Doug.
Hi Paul,
Have you seen this new Futaba S-Bus setup? http://www.rcmarket.org/s-bus-pg-32.html
Doug.
A bit much for me but i can see how it could be used on larger models.
Paul
#2124
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
Hallo. Anyone knows if the range on the 12FG fasst decreases slightly as the voltage gets nearer the alarm limit? Got my first failsafe condition today in a CARF Hawk. Not to be repeated to often i hope. All went well.
#2125
RE: Futaba FASST feedback and TESTING
I have had the Tx battery alarm on my 12FG activate on a couple of occastions without any misshap or loss of control, I would look at the battery being low at the other end i.e. the servo rx battery.
Mike
Mike