RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   RC Jets (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-jets-120/)
-   -   will the concorde fly again?? (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-jets-120/11621882-will-concorde-fly-again.html)

hmjets 09-19-2015 02:33 PM

will the concorde fly again??
 
http://flightclub.jalopnik.com/conco...=1442606525838

ira d 09-19-2015 04:04 PM

Hard to say at this point we will just have to wait and see.

FalconWings 09-19-2015 04:38 PM

We have a resident Concorde expert, Im sure he will chime in. But at the very least you can be sure that this will cost an absurd amount of money to bring back to flight, and a ridiculous amount to sustain.

flytmates 09-19-2015 06:19 PM

Would love to see someone resurrect this amazing aircraft. Would love to see it fly again!

sideshow 09-19-2015 08:00 PM


Originally Posted by falconwings (Post 12101752)
we have a resident concorde expert, im sure he will chime in.

lolz

erbroens 09-19-2015 09:00 PM


But at the very least you can be sure that this will cost an absurd amount of money to bring back to flight, and a ridiculous amount to sustain.
Sounds a lot like our models!

Hopefully the most graceful airplane ever made will fly again. There is no reason for not doing it...just the opposite.

HarryC 09-19-2015 11:56 PM

A plane needs an engineering authority. Airbus was the EA but withdrew which was what forced British Airways to stop concorde flights. Airbus is not going to reverse that decision and i cant imagine anyone else having the expertise and the data. Imo it's never going to happen.

ira d 09-20-2015 12:21 AM


Originally Posted by HarryC (Post 12101828)
A plane needs an engineering authority. Airbus was the EA but withdrew which was what forced British Airways to stop concorde flights. Airbus is not going to reverse that decision and i cant imagine anyone else having the expertise and the data. Imo it's never going to happen.

You made a good point but OTOH I would think the people that want to fly it again would already be aware of that problem and must have a solution in mind.

HarryC 09-20-2015 12:44 AM


Originally Posted by ira d (Post 12101830)
You made a good point but OTOH I would think the people that want to fly it again would already be aware of that problem and must have a solution in mind.

The article linked to in the op explains why it will not happen, without realising it. The article makes big reference to the success of Vulcan XH558. And why is XH558 retiring next month? Because the necessary engineering authorities are ceasing their support. There are several reasons why, but money isnt one of them. For example they are relying on persuading people out of retirement because the systems are so old no existing staff knows them. Rolls royce cited this as a reason for withdrawing support for XH558's Olympus engines - and what engines does concorde have?!!

An acquaintance of mine was one of Concorde's original design engineers. After the Paris crash in 2000, Airbus was so short of people with the necessary knowledge that he and others were asked back from their retirement to work on the design to strengthen the fuel tanks. He is dead now and i expect that most of the others are too. This isnt a problem of money, the knowledge is simply disappearing, and Concorde is a whole magnitude of order more complex than a Vulcan.

imo this is a pipe dream.

airplanegeek 09-20-2015 09:29 AM

If the aircraft was not economically viable during its prime, it surely would not be viable economic investment today. We will have to be content to visit the concord at the Air and Space museum.

rgburrill 09-20-2015 10:50 AM

Will it fly again? Probably. Will it fly commercially? No likely.

ira d 09-20-2015 11:50 AM


Originally Posted by rgburrill (Post 12101995)
Will it fly again? Probably. Will it fly commercially? No likely.


I agree it won't fly commercially but then again that is not the intent of the group that wants to bring it back as I understand it. But I think to just get it in the air again would not be a impossible feat if there is a enough money behind the project.
At this point I would not put any money on the odds of it flying but as I said it's hard to say I will just wait and see.

FalconWings 09-20-2015 03:09 PM

Everything comes down to money. Money to train Engineers. Money to convert raster drawings to CAD, money to restart retired product lines, money to replace parts that have reached their life limit. Then again, some things you just cant buy, like experience.

Zeeb 09-20-2015 06:30 PM

Ain't 'gonna happen.... This isn't like the SR-71's which were reactivated using parts from other existing airframes when the Pentagon realized that the satellites couldn't do what the Blackbirds could and it cost a BUNCH of money.

There aren't any private companies that could shoulder the costs let alone the regulatory BS involved in getting it's Airworthiness Certificate back.....


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.