Community
Search
Notices
RC Pattern Flying Discuss all topics pertaining to RC Pattern Flying in this forum.

Hacker/Ditex servos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2016, 10:34 AM
  #1  
OhD
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: west hills, CA
Posts: 1,160
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Hacker/Ditex servos

http://www.ditex-servo.com/en/

This could be a new era in RC Modeling.

Jim O
Old 01-30-2016, 09:06 PM
  #2  
speedracerntrixie
My Feedback: (29)
 
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Happy Valley, Oregon
Posts: 9,515
Received 176 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Impressive. The torque specs are a little confusing to us regular type guys.
Old 01-31-2016, 09:36 PM
  #3  
OhD
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: west hills, CA
Posts: 1,160
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
Impressive. The torque specs are a little confusing to us regular type guys.
Most of the world uses Newtons instead of pounds for force and meters instead of feet for length. So in Germany, torque would be specified in Newton-meters or in this case Newton-centimeters. If you have an iPhone you must have an app called iConvert. You can then convert N-m to in-oz. You would need to divide N-cm by 100 to convert N-m. So 162 N-cm (1.62 N-m) equals 229 in-oz.

Hope this helps, Jim O
Old 02-01-2016, 03:47 AM
  #4  
drac1
My Feedback: (4)
 
drac1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Romaine, Tasmania, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,737
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OhD
Most of the world uses Newtons instead of pounds for force and meters instead of feet for length. So in Germany, torque would be specified in Newton-meters or in this case Newton-centimeters. If you have an iPhone you must have an app called iConvert. You can then convert N-m to in-oz. You would need to divide N-cm by 100 to convert N-m. So 162 N-cm (1.62 N-m) equals 229 in-oz.

Hope this helps, Jim O
This is the first time I've seen n-cm used for servo torque. It's always been either oz-in or kg-cm.
Old 02-01-2016, 12:15 PM
  #5  
OhD
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: west hills, CA
Posts: 1,160
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drac1
This is the first time I've seen n-cm used for servo torque. It's always been either oz-in or kg-cm.
In the US pounds is used for force and also for mass by most people (units for mass are really slugs) and sometimes it is not clear so you might see them specified lb f or lb m. In the International System, kg is used for mass and Newtons for force to distinguish between. When we are talking about torque we know it's force and we assume we can convert kg to pounds by dividing by 2.2. So you are right it is a lot easier for most Americans to think in terms of kilograms than Newtons.

Jim O
Old 02-01-2016, 02:55 PM
  #6  
drac1
My Feedback: (4)
 
drac1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Romaine, Tasmania, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,737
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OhD
In the US pounds is used for force and also for mass by most people (units for mass are really slugs) and sometimes it is not clear so you might see them specified lb f or lb m. In the International System, kg is used for mass and Newtons for force to distinguish between. When we are talking about torque we know it's force and we assume we can convert kg to pounds by dividing by 2.2. So you are right it is a lot easier for most Americans to think in terms of kilograms than Newtons.

Jim O
Yes I'm well aware of who uses which system for measuring force. Ft-lbs and n-m are not relevant to this thread as the force of the servos we use are no where near that high. Hence the use of oz-in and kg-cm. These are the 2 most common ones used.
As I said, I haven't seen n-cm used before for servo force before now.
Old 02-02-2016, 11:23 AM
  #7  
stegl
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: kelowna, BC, CANADA
Posts: 431
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Metric and imperial servos measurements are show by the following manufacturers but there may be others: Airtronics ( 31 servo models) Futaba , Hitec, Spektrum and MKS . Not a big deal as easy to convert but both would be nice.

Off shore kit or ARF manufacturers usually ( not always) list minimum servo torque ratings in their manual unless specifically built for an American distributor . Have to check the manuals.
Old 02-10-2017, 06:37 AM
  #8  
mups53
My Feedback: (41)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Algonquin Illinois IL
Posts: 2,347
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

http://www.f3aunlimited.com/radios-a...s/hacker-ditex
We're a new preferred dealer. Wow, these things are really impressive.
Mike Mueller
Old 02-11-2017, 08:45 AM
  #9  
OhD
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: west hills, CA
Posts: 1,160
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drac1
Yes I'm well aware of who uses which system for measuring force. Ft-lbs and n-m are not relevant to this thread as the force of the servos we use are no where near that high. Hence the use of oz-in and kg-cm. These are the 2 most common ones used.
As I said, I haven't seen n-cm used before for servo force before now.
I don't see why the value of the torque can be too low or too high to express it in the metric system. On the low side you could go to milliNewton-millimeters for example. You could also use Dyne-cm.

Anyway it is good to be able to think in metric units nowadays, although I still have trouble with grams and need to convert it to ounces so I guess I shouldn't talk.

I'm anxious to get some reports on the Hacker-Ditex servos.

Jim O
Old 02-12-2017, 02:04 AM
  #10  
serious power
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: wexford, IRELAND
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

' Anyway it is good to be able to think in metric units nowadays, although I still have trouble with grams and need to convert it to ounces so I guess I shouldn't talk. '

Hi Jim,
This might help with thinking in grams ; Think about WATER
Most know this but don't realise it.

1 Millilitre = 1cm\3 - weighs 1 gram
1,000cm\3 = 1 Litre - weighs 1Kg

Brian

Last edited by serious power; 02-12-2017 at 02:12 AM.
Old 02-12-2017, 04:30 AM
  #11  
Malcolm H
 
Malcolm H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: glasgow, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 718
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Yes Brian at 4 Deg Celsius. But at 20 Deg its dropped to 998 cm3/litre and at 0 Deg in liquid state its dropped again to 999 cm3/litre and even lower to 915 cm3/litre as it solidifies.

You can see I had nothing better to do on this cold windy winter's afternoon than argue with you Brian!

Malcolm��
Old 02-12-2017, 11:36 AM
  #12  
serious power
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: wexford, IRELAND
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi Malcolm,
It's always 4 Deg in Ireland

Funny stuff water ; Gets less dense as temp increases above 4C and also less dense at temp decreases below 4C.

Brian

PS ; Did you mean Gram/Litre ? You forgot to specify an altitude
Old 02-12-2017, 11:58 AM
  #13  
Malcolm H
 
Malcolm H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: glasgow, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 718
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Nope Brian I meant cm3/litre, that is cc/litre!

You mean it gets as warm as 4 deg C in Enniscorthy?

Malcolm
Old 02-12-2017, 12:35 PM
  #14  
serious power
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: wexford, IRELAND
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi Malcolm,
There was I thinking that there were 1,000 cm\3 in a litre - regardless of the density of the substance occupying the volume and even in a litre of vacuum.
I think Grams/Litre.

Brian

PS ; We're not helping Jim much
Old 02-12-2017, 02:38 PM
  #15  
OhD
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: west hills, CA
Posts: 1,160
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by serious power
Hi Malcolm,
There was I thinking that there were 1,000 cm\3 in a litre - regardless of the density of the substance occupying the volume and even in a litre of vacuum.
I think Grams/Litre.

Brian

PS ; We're not helping Jim much

I must admit the SI system is pretty neat and it is strange the US is one of the few countries that doesn't use it. But how do you guys know what a Newton-Meter is? Is it a Joule or is it .7375 lbf-ft? In the US we use ft.-lbf for energy and lbf-ft. for torque. Seems like a Joule ought to be a Meter-Newton?

Things are pretty slow here also. We had to cancel our "Pattern Camp" this weekend due to weather. One of the problems with electric power is there isn't much maintenance required and the aircraft don't wear out. What do we do when the weather is bad? Not much happening on the web either. I'm happy to see you guys are alive and well and have nothing better to do either.

I guess I should spend my afternoon remembering 28.349 and .03527. But I've always got iConvert on my iPhone if I can't remember.

Jim O
Old 02-13-2017, 01:48 AM
  #16  
serious power
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: wexford, IRELAND
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Malcolm H
Nope Brian I meant cm3/litre, that is cc/litre!

You mean it gets as warm as 4 deg C in Enniscorthy?

Malcolm
Hi Malcolm,
At 20C water weighs 0.9982 Gram per cm\3 - or - 998.2 Grams per Litre.

998cm\3 Is 0.998 Litres !!

Brian
Old 02-13-2017, 01:54 AM
  #17  
serious power
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: wexford, IRELAND
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi Jim,
It used to that all we needed was love - now we too often turn to Google

It seems you guys have a few cm\3 too many in that reservoir - looks serious !!

Brian
Old 02-13-2017, 05:18 AM
  #18  
Malcolm H
 
Malcolm H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: glasgow, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 718
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Brian,

Just seen this, of course, brain fade! I did mean g/Litre.

Must be the cold!

Jim, I'm a hydraulic engineer working in the offshore industry with many of your colleagues. Even more confusing is the fact that your flowrate of gallons per minute is different to our old imperial unit. Yours contains 231 in3 and ours was 277.4 in3. Its amazing the number of times people this side of the pond get caught out by that one when converting to Litres.

Malcolm
Old 02-13-2017, 11:51 AM
  #19  
OhD
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: west hills, CA
Posts: 1,160
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Malcolm H
Brian,

Just seen this, of course, brain fade! I did mean g/Litre.

Must be the cold!

Jim, I'm a hydraulic engineer working in the offshore industry with many of your colleagues. Even more confusing is the fact that your flowrate of gallons per minute is different to our old imperial unit. Yours contains 231 in3 and ours was 277.4 in3. Its amazing the number of times people this side of the pond get caught out by that one when converting to Litres.

Malcolm

Yeah, you guys pulled a fast one. You gave us the small gallon and then after the divorce you changed the rules and came up with the big Imperial Gallon. Luckily my iPhone knows that too.

It looks like we need you and your colleagues in California. For years we've been in drought conditions and now we have too much water and it is causing havoc.

Jim
Old 02-15-2017, 12:40 PM
  #20  
mups53
My Feedback: (41)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Algonquin Illinois IL
Posts: 2,347
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Guys Peter Vogel is doing a very in-depth report of the new Ditex servos in the K Factor coming up.
' His data is astounding.
It looks like we have a game-changing lineup of servos!!!
Mike Mueller

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.