![]() |
Oxygene
Hello
New plane designed by Arnaud Poyet member french F3A Team and built by Hui Yang. Awesome design. https://www.facebook.com/oxygenF3A/?__tn__=HHH-R https://www.hobbynet-jp.com/?pid=149523540 claude https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...ac42d50630.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...c14e1424d9.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...bda2073b7a.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...c4a645a402.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...3168acb794.jpg |
Hello
Arnaud Poyet designer of this plane received his. https://www.facebook.com/oxygenF3A/ https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...610257e14e.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...a2010574f4.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...9bcb8bd8b0.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...88924b4b92.jpg |
Oxygene and Akuma + seems to be very similar, if not the same, model.
|
Beautiful plane. How are flight this model?
|
Hi,
With containment, I haven't been able to fly yet. It is an evolution of my Elixir, of which I am not worried. I'll keep you posted when it has flown. Best regards. Arnaud |
Oxygene and Akuma + seems to be very similar, if not the same, model. __________________ Ricardo Mendez Turell But I think both designs are really great. Greetings Gerhard https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...dbe9a89cab.jpg |
Originally Posted by Flowmotion
(Post 12598424)
In fact, both models look extremely similar. There are only very slight differences. The basic interpretation seems very similar.
But I think both designs are really great. Greetings Gerhard https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.rcu...dbe9a89cab.jpg |
I just received my "Oxygen" from Aerobertics --
Should I set the Tail at "0" degrees and wing also at "0" degrees" Incidence? |
Originally Posted by ajay1
(Post 12632423)
I just received my "Oxygen" from Aerobertics --
Should I set the Tail at "0" degrees and wing also at "0" degrees" Incidence? |
I would say normally wing 0.5 - 0.7 degrees positive, stab @ zero.
Motor 0.5 - 2.0 degrees negative depending on plane and preferences. If plane is on the heavy side and/or wing area is small maybe 1.0 degree is needed. |
2 Attachment(s)
Hello,
My current setup is stab at 0°, wing at 0,8°. For the datum line, the canopy is exactly at -3°. Best regards. |
Hello,
I have a question about the center of gravity/ C.G. for the Super Oxygen There are very different informations: Oxygen : 270 mm Website F3a unlimited and Aerobertics for the Super Oxygen: 274 mm Website Hui Yang for the Super Oxygen: 320 mm ! These are already very big differences between the information of the website of Hui Yang and the others. Which one is the right, does anybody knows the right CG? Thank you very much. Best regards Jochen |
4 Attachment(s)
Hello,
I use a C.G. around 320mm, which is 36%. You can start at 320mm and then adjust later by doing flight tests. Best regards. |
Hello Arnaud,
thank you for the quick answer, thats how I try it. Are the other settinges for the Super Oxygen unchanged to the former Oxygen? stab at 0°, wing at 0,8°, Adverrun contra at 0°. Did I measure correct, the fuselage front ist – 1 °. Thanks Best regards Jochen |
Hello,
Yes, stab 0°, wing 0,7 to 0,8° and adverrun at 0°. For down thrust, noise is -1°, I put a little more. Around -2°. Best regards. Arnaud. |
Just wondering.....
Is the downthrust mentioned above relative to the stab or the thrustlne of the airframe...?? |
Originally Posted by FBW
(Post 12801006)
Just wondering.....
Is the downthrust mentioned above relative to the stab or the thrustlne of the airframe...?? |
Originally Posted by FBW
(Post 12801659)
Is this a silly question too hard or a well guarded secret.........Sorry I am new to this
|
Thanks for the reply drac1....
Am I correct in saying that when the gentleman above says Adverun at 0 deg he means relative to the nose ring ... |
Originally Posted by FBW
(Post 12801773)
Thanks for the reply drac1....
Am I correct in saying that when the gentleman above says Adverun at 0 deg he means relative to the nose ring ... |
Ok let me ask this in a different way...
If the airframe has a build in down thrust of negative one degree relative to the theoretical thrust line and the wing is set at positive .8 degrees relative to this line....does the airframe now have a down thrust of 1.8 degrees or is it still 1.0 degrees . |
Originally Posted by FBW
(Post 12802041)
Ok let me ask this in a different way...
If the airframe has a build in down thrust of negative one degree relative to the theoretical thrust line and the wing is set at positive .8 degrees relative to this line....does the airframe now have a down thrust of 1.8 degrees or is it still 1.0 degrees . Ask yourself this. Is the wing incidence the datum line? |
Originally Posted by drac1
(Post 12802043)
Everything is relative to the datum/thrust line.
Ask yourself this. Is the wing incidence the datum line? When you buy a new airframe is the wing set zero degrees to this datum / thrust line ?? |
Originally Posted by FBW
(Post 12802164)
I don't know is it....??
When you buy a new airframe is the wing set zero degrees to this datum / thrust line ?? |
Hi!
I am tentatively interested in this plane. Can someone please tell me how it flies compared to other modern F3A monoplanes? Is the fuselage so high that it is difficult to see the position of the wings? How does the plane fly compared to modern F3A biplanes? Does the swept wing design help with integrated rolls? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.