![]() |
Nats Numbers
Hey Everyone.
Have seen the reports on the Nats and the projected pilot #'s but nothing on the actual numbers. We all know Imac was down by at least a 1/3 from last year. Some say from gas $$. On the NSRCA list prior to the Nats the projected # for pattern was 120, so how many actually showed up?? Ed |
RE: Nats Numbers
I think that the report says 110. The surprizing number is the amount of top notch flyers that showed up for FAI. Its a virtual whos who of pattern.
---Mike |
RE: Nats Numbers
Ed,
For the IMAC case, I believe that the holiday weekend was a factor. I had the same problem in a pattern contest that I decide to do it in the 4th of July weekend. That prove to be a wrong decision. Next year, I am planing to schedule the contest after the holiday weekend. For the Nats pattern I think the participation is very similar to last year. Regards, Vicente Bortone |
RE: Nats Numbers
Plus IMAC has several big events they can attend. Nats isn't as big a deal to them.
|
RE: Nats Numbers
[quote]ORIGINAL: rm
Plus IMAC has several big events they can attend. Nats isn't as big a deal to them. Very good point. They are used to the big events having significant $ prizes which the Nats will never have. Mike |
RE: Nats Numbers
Yeah, forgot it started on July 4 didn't it. Still curious though.
ed |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:27 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.