DX6i ... is it sufficient?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Russellville, AR
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DX6i ... is it sufficient?
I am finally coming back to RC hobby but realized things has changed quite a bit. I still have a hitec optic 6 72 mhz radio, still works great however I am planning on moving to 2.4 Ghz system. Is DX6i a good radio? When I say good, I mean dependable and good programming features.I am mostly in helis, 4-5 channel aircrafts and may be some basic quadrocopters. What do you all suggest? If there is something better under $200 range, please suggest. Thank you.
#2
My Feedback: (2)
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
ORIGINAL: egenesis1
I am finally coming back to RC hobby but realized things has changed quite a bit. I still have a hitec optic 6 72 mhz radio, still works great however I am planning on moving to 2.4 Ghz system. Is DX6i a good radio? When I say good, I mean dependable and good programming features. I am mostly in helis, 4-5 channel aircrafts and may be some basic quadrocopters. What do you all suggest? If there is something better under $200 range, please suggest. Thank you.
I am finally coming back to RC hobby but realized things has changed quite a bit. I still have a hitec optic 6 72 mhz radio, still works great however I am planning on moving to 2.4 Ghz system. Is DX6i a good radio? When I say good, I mean dependable and good programming features. I am mostly in helis, 4-5 channel aircrafts and may be some basic quadrocopters. What do you all suggest? If there is something better under $200 range, please suggest. Thank you.
Hobby King is selling some very inexpensive 9 channel radios that might fall into your price range and handle both Fixed Wing and Heli's.
#3
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
Take a look at the Airtronics line. AlsoI always suggest when someone asks a question such as yours that theytake some time and read through the
various forums and see what is being said about the available radios on the market. As for Hobby King if you do a search on them here at RCU I think
you will find a lot of folks have had problems with them. In the end do some research and then make up your mind.
various forums and see what is being said about the available radios on the market. As for Hobby King if you do a search on them here at RCU I think
you will find a lot of folks have had problems with them. In the end do some research and then make up your mind.
#5
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
ORIGINAL: fizzwater2
If your optic 6 is modular, you could pick up the Hitec 2.4 GHz module for it - and you're already familiar with how to operate that one.
If your optic 6 is modular, you could pick up the Hitec 2.4 GHz module for it - and you're already familiar with how to operate that one.
#10
My Feedback: (36)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: burlington,
WI
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
They both have only two free mixes. The 6i has three dual rate switches, only two for the optic 6. Ten model memory for the 6i, only six for the optic 6. Would not get model match with the optic 6. Can be used with all the bind and flys from Horizon, optic 6 you can't. the6i is easier to program. I have both. The only step up I see is the sailplane functions.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: College Park,
MD
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
The DX6i is always a good choice. Although, the ATX SD-6G comes with three flight modes and two free mixers in each flight mode. All in all, you get six free mixes.
Another radio in the 6-channel class is the Futaba T6J S-FHSS. S-FHSS is cheaper than the standard Futaba FASST receivers.
Another radio in the 6-channel class is the Futaba T6J S-FHSS. S-FHSS is cheaper than the standard Futaba FASST receivers.
#12
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dorset, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
For a canard model can the DX6i be programmed to mix elevon on the wings with with elevator on the canard, to increase pitch control?
Thanks,
Gerry
Thanks,
Gerry
#13
My Feedback: (2)
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
Elevon implies you are using the wings as both elevator and aileron. So I presume this is a flying wing or a delta wing, not a conventional tube and wing aircraft.
We can tell you about mixing but I would have to wonder if you are asking the right question without seeing the aircraft.
But to answer, put the canard on another channel and us a user mix to get it to follow elevator commands.
#14
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dorset, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
Thanks for your input aeajr.
On the DX6i in elevon mode the left wing aileron servo goes in the AILE Rx socket and the right wing aileron servo goes in the ELEV Rx socket.
Amongst other things, I tried putting the canard elevator servo into the RUDD Rx socket and mixing ELEV to RUDD.
But then the canard elevator slavishly followed the right wing aileron servo which, of course has an aileron (roll) function as well as an elevator (pitch ) function.
So doesn't work as required.
Gerry
On the DX6i in elevon mode the left wing aileron servo goes in the AILE Rx socket and the right wing aileron servo goes in the ELEV Rx socket.
Amongst other things, I tried putting the canard elevator servo into the RUDD Rx socket and mixing ELEV to RUDD.
But then the canard elevator slavishly followed the right wing aileron servo which, of course has an aileron (roll) function as well as an elevator (pitch ) function.
So doesn't work as required.
Gerry
#15
My Feedback: (2)
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
ORIGINAL: E.Gerry
Thanks for your input aeajr.
On the DX6i in elevon mode the left wing aileron servo goes in the AILE Rx socket and the right wing aileron servo goes in the ELEV Rx socket.
Amongst other things, I tried putting the canard elevator servo into the RUDD Rx socket and mixing ELEV to RUDD.
But then the canard elevator slavishly followed the right wing aileron servo which, of course has an aileron (roll) function as well as an elevator (pitch ) function.
So doesn't work as required.
Gerry
Thanks for your input aeajr.
On the DX6i in elevon mode the left wing aileron servo goes in the AILE Rx socket and the right wing aileron servo goes in the ELEV Rx socket.
Amongst other things, I tried putting the canard elevator servo into the RUDD Rx socket and mixing ELEV to RUDD.
But then the canard elevator slavishly followed the right wing aileron servo which, of course has an aileron (roll) function as well as an elevator (pitch ) function.
So doesn't work as required.
Gerry
If you mix elevator to rudder, meaning elevator is master and rudder is slave then it should only respond to elevator commands regardless of what the right wing control surface does. Right and left aileron commands should have no effect.
Be sure you have not activated aileron/rudder mixing.
Before you engage the canard. Have you confirmed that your elevons are going in the proper directions for both aileron and elevator.
Please also confim that you are not accidentially using Vtail mix, which involves different channels.
If you mix elevator to rudder it should work. but, if not, try mixing aileron to flap. that would be a more compatible, more usual combo since both go up and down in a similar fashion.
#16
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dorset, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
Thank you for your kind interest aeajr.
The model is the Cozy canard, a derivative of the Burt Rutan Long-EZ.
I can confirm both wing servos are working in the correct directions for elevon control, as in a flying wing.
What I want to do is input the canard elevator at the same time as the wing servos act as elevators, to increase the pitching control.
Will look for a photo.
Thanks,
Gerry
The model is the Cozy canard, a derivative of the Burt Rutan Long-EZ.
I can confirm both wing servos are working in the correct directions for elevon control, as in a flying wing.
What I want to do is input the canard elevator at the same time as the wing servos act as elevators, to increase the pitching control.
Will look for a photo.
Thanks,
Gerry
#18
My Feedback: (2)
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
ORIGINAL: E.Gerry
Thank you for your kind interest aeajr.
The model is the Cozy canard, a derivative of the Burt Rutan Long-EZ.
I can confirm both wing servos are working in the correct directions for elevon control, as in a flying wing.
What I want to do is input the canard elevator at the same time as the wing servos act as elevators, to increase the pitching control.
Will look for a photo.
Thanks,
Gerry
Thank you for your kind interest aeajr.
The model is the Cozy canard, a derivative of the Burt Rutan Long-EZ.
I can confirm both wing servos are working in the correct directions for elevon control, as in a flying wing.
What I want to do is input the canard elevator at the same time as the wing servos act as elevators, to increase the pitching control.
Will look for a photo.
Thanks,
Gerry
I have run into problems like this in the past. I had a Futaba 7AUPS. I set up a Programmable Mix so I could have Dual Elevators. The Elevator was the Master and Ch7 was the Slave. If I tried to mix anything to the Elevators, only the Elevator servo plugged into the Elevator channel responded. I had to buy a Futaba 8AUPS to solve my problem.
Sometimes you need more programming than your radio is capable of, which forces you to buy a more advanced radio.
http://spektrumrc.com/ProdInfo/Files...anual_DX6i.pdf
#20
My Feedback: (2)
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
ORIGINAL: aeajr
Good point about the canard moving with the rudder. How foolish of me.
So put it on channel 5, the gear channel and mix elevator to gear. See how that works.
Good point about the canard moving with the rudder. How foolish of me.
So put it on channel 5, the gear channel and mix elevator to gear. See how that works.
#21
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dorset, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: DX6i ... is it sufficient?
Thank you guys, I really appreciate you exploring my options.
I just think the DX6i cannot do what I want.
Out of interest, on a canard forum one of the contributors said he also mixed separate elevators on the canard to increase the roll rate, must have had a pretty sophisticated radio!
It looks like I shall have to improve the flying characteristics of the model or get myself a better radio.
Many thanks,
Gerry
I just think the DX6i cannot do what I want.
Out of interest, on a canard forum one of the contributors said he also mixed separate elevators on the canard to increase the roll rate, must have had a pretty sophisticated radio!
It looks like I shall have to improve the flying characteristics of the model or get myself a better radio.
Many thanks,
Gerry