Reciever Antennae..good/bad
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hugoton, KS
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reciever Antennae..good/bad
Friend of mine has decided to try this antennae in his ISC 1/3 scale bipe...just curious if any of you have any experience with this kind of antennae set up. Any range problems?, the bipe is gas (3W 78b2) with smoke. Let us know what to expect...hopefully good news.
Chris
Chris
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Muskegon,
MI
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Reciever Antennae..good/bad
Full-A buddy swears by the Deans whip antennae; I"d rather not risk an expensive airplane on some thing "different" (expensive is anything costing over three dollars rtf)...JIM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rochester,
NY
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Reciever Antennae..good/bad
The risk you're talking about is only in your mind, their radiation pickup patterns are different, not better or worse. The currents invovled in receiver signal processing are miniscule to say the least at range and modern day CMOS fabrication is so precise you'd have a hard time scientifically proving (real world fact not theory) that a Dean's antenna has a higher risk factor than a standard receiver antenna. Transmitter's are a bit of a different story because the radiation pattern becomes important then, but not that many people use Dean's style antenna's on an xmitter.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hugoton, KS
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Reciever Antennae..good/bad
Lynx,
Thanks for the radiation 101 lesson, just a bit nervous about cutting my rx antennae as elementary as it sounds. Im sure the Dean whip is a fine product...and it will prove so once we range check it....
Thanks again,
chris
Thanks for the radiation 101 lesson, just a bit nervous about cutting my rx antennae as elementary as it sounds. Im sure the Dean whip is a fine product...and it will prove so once we range check it....
Thanks again,
chris
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lincoln,
NE
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Reciever Antennae..good/bad
A loaded antenna (like the Deans) can perform nearly as well as a tradtional 1/4 wave antenna IF it is well designed. If it was me, I'd closely check range compared to a more traditional setup before flying.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rochester,
NY
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Reciever Antennae..good/bad
Check positions too, you may find you a dead zone in a particular orientation of the antenna that might be helped by simply aiming it a different direction.
#9
My Feedback: (65)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Reciever Antennae..good/bad
Fly one in my Super Reaper/RAM 500 turbine combo with no problems.
I was nervous about it at first too, so I flew the radio/antenna/receiver combination in a "test" airplane for more than two hours of air time. Always fly anything repaired or new in a junker airframe I keep just for that purpose.
I was nervous about it at first too, so I flew the radio/antenna/receiver combination in a "test" airplane for more than two hours of air time. Always fly anything repaired or new in a junker airframe I keep just for that purpose.