Why is this reciever so cheap?
[link=http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=003&item=130001324505&rd =1&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWN%3AIT&rd=1]www.ebay.co.uk/ebayISAPI.dll?[/link]
I have bought it, and I want to use it with a 6EXA transmitter that I have not yet bought. Will it work? |
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
is it positive shift or negative?
there are certain areas where I refuse to cut corners... serovs and Rx's are at the top of that list |
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
positive shift
|
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
then it won't work....
Futaba uses negative shift, JR uses positive |
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
Well, actually that was a guess. I thought that North America used negative, and the rest of the world used postive. In that case, it is whatever is most common.
|
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
they both are most common.... it depends on your Radio brand....
as mentioned Futaba (and a few others) use negative shift, and JR(and others) use positive.... at least here in the States that is how it is.... |
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
I have read, here on RCU, that Futaba uses positive shift everywhere, but the US. Don't how true that may be.
|
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
I think Futaba made it for "customer fidelity". You know what it means: incompatibility even with their own positive shift receivers. I suppose Futaba customers, specially those who had many positive shift receivers, are very happy.
Hitec and Multiplex Tx allows transmitting in positive or negative shift. |
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
1 Attachment(s)
According to the item description it works with "ALL" PPM transmitters.
It is rated for 800 meter range |
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
ORIGINAL: exeter_acres they both are most common.... it depends on your Radio brand.... as mentioned Futaba (and a few others) use negative shift, and JR(and others) use positive.... at least here in the States that is how it is.... The receiver may work fine, but like exeter, I wouldn't take the risk, except maybe for a for a small light foamy type of model, and even for one of these I'd use a known cheapo brand like GWS. Anything more complex, more delicate or more dangerous gets a better Rx. Most recent one I bought was a Hyperion DSP (same circuitry as a Berg, but on 35mhz) which is supposed to have some of the best glitch protection out there, better than PCM. Matthew |
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
Its only for a 3channel glider, so I'll take the risk...
|
RE: Why is this reciever so cheap?
Remember, you get what you pay for.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:42 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.