WW-I Instrument faceplates
#1
WW-I Instrument faceplates
I noticed that good WW-I instrument faceplates are hard to find. So I started to redraw some German instruments needed for my Fokker E.III project. I uploaded them on Photobucket so that everybody can download and use them for free. My goal is to redraw a new instrument so now and then and add it to the collection, so keep posted to my Photobucket album
The faceplates are all free to use, NOT for commercial purpose! Only mention my name when someone asks you about the faceplates.
For a complete overview see my album at Photobucket: [link=http://s276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/Teus-nl/Instrument%20faces/?start=all]WW-I instrument faceplates[/link]
Teus
Some examples you will find at Photobucket:
The faceplates are all free to use, NOT for commercial purpose! Only mention my name when someone asks you about the faceplates.
For a complete overview see my album at Photobucket: [link=http://s276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/Teus-nl/Instrument%20faces/?start=all]WW-I instrument faceplates[/link]
Teus
Some examples you will find at Photobucket:
#7
Banned
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
Thank you Teus. In spite of my "snail mail" dial up internet connection, I downloaded every blessed one of the instruments shown. I already had some of them, from a previous research, but I think these are more sharp, clearer than what I had previously gotten.
Thanks again,
Les
Thanks again,
Les
#10
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
I downloaded one and opened it up in photoshop.
The image was 14" X 14" at 72 dpi.
I reduced the size to .75 and the image cannot be printed clearly.
Gee, I thought I knew my software?
What am I doing wrong?
The image was 14" X 14" at 72 dpi.
I reduced the size to .75 and the image cannot be printed clearly.
Gee, I thought I knew my software?
What am I doing wrong?
#11
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
Charles,
The most easiest and functional way is to print the faceplates in MS Word. Just open all the files you want to print in Word and set in the image properties menu (right click on image) the correct dimensions in mm in the image size Tab. Then go to the print menu and set the correct paper source, for best quality use photopaper and choose in your printer settings the highest print quality (Photo quality). That should give you a razor sharp print, depending on the qualities of your printer off course.
Now you are printing the file in the highest resolution. Never change the image resolution in your photo editor. If you are printing from your Photo editor than just print the unchanged file and set the print dimensions in the print file menu.
I hope you understand what I mean, see attached photo (not complete sharp ) for the possible quality. This was with a Epson Stylus Photo PX710W printer on Photo paper.
The trick is: Don't resize the faceplates but set the needed print dimensions in the print menu
Doc,
I think you mean only the compasses with out needles?
Teus
The most easiest and functional way is to print the faceplates in MS Word. Just open all the files you want to print in Word and set in the image properties menu (right click on image) the correct dimensions in mm in the image size Tab. Then go to the print menu and set the correct paper source, for best quality use photopaper and choose in your printer settings the highest print quality (Photo quality). That should give you a razor sharp print, depending on the qualities of your printer off course.
Now you are printing the file in the highest resolution. Never change the image resolution in your photo editor. If you are printing from your Photo editor than just print the unchanged file and set the print dimensions in the print file menu.
I hope you understand what I mean, see attached photo (not complete sharp ) for the possible quality. This was with a Epson Stylus Photo PX710W printer on Photo paper.
The trick is: Don't resize the faceplates but set the needed print dimensions in the print menu
Doc,
I think you mean only the compasses with out needles?
Teus
#16
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
I have Photoshop.
I explained that I downloaded the image and it was at 72 dpi's.
If the image was at 300 dpi's I could easily print it.
I built this panel in Photoshop.
I explained that I downloaded the image and it was at 72 dpi's.
If the image was at 300 dpi's I could easily print it.
I built this panel in Photoshop.
#17
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
So you can razor sharp at 72 dpi Charles,
For Adobe Photoshop users;
* Choose "print with preview" from the File menu,
* Set the needed Height and Width in the Scaled Print Size box,
* push the print button,
Print should be razor sharp!
Teus
For Adobe Photoshop users;
* Choose "print with preview" from the File menu,
* Set the needed Height and Width in the Scaled Print Size box,
* push the print button,
Print should be razor sharp!
Teus
#18
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
Teus,
OK! Yes, sharp!
Thanks, I've learned something.
Please tell me, how come when I reduce the image in Photoshop, before I select Print, I don't get the same results?
What dpi's did you do your original art in? Did you take photos of actual guages?
OK! Yes, sharp!
Thanks, I've learned something.
Please tell me, how come when I reduce the image in Photoshop, before I select Print, I don't get the same results?
What dpi's did you do your original art in? Did you take photos of actual guages?
#19
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
I don't know exactly how it works but when you re size in PS you down sample the picture. For example from 72 to 20 dpi and then yes the picture becomes pixelized.
In the print menu, what works the same as my suggestion with MS Word, you scale the picture down and the dpi stays 72 dpi. Maybe there is someone who can better explains?
My originals are made in 72 dpi (1024x1024px) and are drawn in PS CS2 as an overlay on original photos.
Teus
In the print menu, what works the same as my suggestion with MS Word, you scale the picture down and the dpi stays 72 dpi. Maybe there is someone who can better explains?
My originals are made in 72 dpi (1024x1024px) and are drawn in PS CS2 as an overlay on original photos.
Teus
#20
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
I just started again drawing some new instruments and added the first new one to my Photobucket album, so stay tuned
[link=http://s276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/Teus-nl/Instrument%20faces/]WW-I instruments at Photobucket[/link]
Enjoy,
Teus
[link=http://s276.photobucket.com/albums/kk15/Teus-nl/Instrument%20faces/]WW-I instruments at Photobucket[/link]
Enjoy,
Teus
#23
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
ORIGINAL: geezeraviation
Teus, any of them. If there were no needles then needles could be made and placed on the faces under the glass and would be more three dimensional that way.
Teus, any of them. If there were no needles then needles could be made and placed on the faces under the glass and would be more three dimensional that way.
Never thought about your question Doc [X(]
Is this what you are looking for? You only need to figure out the right printing scale for the pointer in combination to the dial's scale.
#24
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
I had been thinking the same thing...but then decided that that was more obsessive that even I'm up for! Besides, then there's the question of whether the dials should indicate typical readings on the ground or in the air.
#25
Banned
RE: WW-I Instrument faceplates
"Besides, then there's the question of whether the dials should indicate typical readings on the ground or in the air. "
Obviously they should be as seen on the ground. You wouldn't be able to see them if in the air; only the "real" pilot would:-)))))))))))))))))
Les
Obviously they should be as seen on the ground. You wouldn't be able to see them if in the air; only the "real" pilot would:-)))))))))))))))))
Les